• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Air suspension system?

  • Thread starter Thread starter streetstang67
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

streetstang67

Member
Mar 5, 2003
573
0
16
Lexington, SC
Apr 11, 2006
#1
  • Apr 11, 2006
  • #1
This summer I'll be finishing the frame and suspension to my car. So far I've relocated the upper a-arms an inch down, added front disc brakes, subframe connectors, and a front 1" sway bar.

Now I need to tackle the springs. I was considering an AIR Ride or similar suspension because it looks like I could do that for the same price as new springs all the way around. AIR-over-leaf universal bolt-on kit for the rears ($230) and coil-rite kit for fronts ($80, and would have to relocate shocks), plus compressor and lines ($250)...Okay, mabye $560 is more than new coils and leafs, but they wouldn't allow variation in stiffness or ride height. What do you think about air suspensions? about this setup? suggestions are needed and appreciated, thanks!
 

streetstang67

Member
Mar 5, 2003
573
0
16
Lexington, SC
Apr 12, 2006
#2
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #2
I'm surprised this isn't a hot topic...after watching a few tv shows advertising for air-ride, and doing a little reading, it seems like the best suspension option for everybody, nobody has it?
 
H

HHStang

Member
May 15, 2003
566
0
16
Coastal SC
Apr 12, 2006
#3
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #3
I do, though my 67 is 4-linked and has a MII front suspension. I like the ability to lower it to get the stance right and raise it to make the car more driveable. I got all my stuff from godfathers customs (they are on the web). They seem to be a very large Airride dealer.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Apr 12, 2006
#4
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #4
streetstang67 said:
...after watching a few tv shows advertising for air-ride, and doing a little reading, it seems like the best suspension option for everybody...
Click to expand...
Boy, is their marketing working on you!

I've attended an Air Ride factory seminar and they certainly have their system tight & together. It probably rides great, and the ride height flexibility would be nice. It's just that most people think it's too much of a PITA to deal with, and don't want to fill their trunk with a tank, a pump, and a bunch of solenoids.

I don't think you'd really get the full benefit of this type of system by using air over leafs anyway. Plus, I think that removing most of your leaf spring would soften your rear suspension in the right-left and torsional directions, which is very undesirable if you actually drive your car.

IMHO, Air Ride is the kind of system that would be great if you go all the way and do it right, i.e. AirBar in the rear and MII in the front (like HHStang).
 

streetstang67

Member
Mar 5, 2003
573
0
16
Lexington, SC
Apr 12, 2006
#5
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #5

I think your right that I'll loose lateral stability by removing leafs, so heres what i was thinking about. Using some tubing, make a rod to run from the front leaf spring mount back to the rear axle, which will hook up with u-bolts. Pretty much as if I cut the back half of the leaf spring off. Then I could put the airbag over the leaf or axle. Here's another pic, the only thing different is that I want to mount the bag on the front half, leaving the back void. I will also have to add a panhard bar. Please tell me what you think, I really need some feedback on this.


 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
Apr 12, 2006
#6
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #6
You will have to use heim joints at the front attachment point of your ladder bars or else the suspension will have next to zero roll (if any).
 

streetstang67

Member
Mar 5, 2003
573
0
16
Lexington, SC
Apr 12, 2006
#7
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #7
Ok, so a little body roll is desirable then; as opposed to absolutely none?

And do you think this setup would work well?
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Apr 12, 2006
#8
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #8
not body roll, suspension/axle roll.

looks like you're going in the direction of a ladder bar system, just with airbags instead of coil overs, which to me seems kinda pointless. But, whatever, I don't fall for any of that stuff anyway.

That front cool-ride setup they've got looks really stupid.


what a waste. Sure you could 'lay frame' in the high school parking lot, but thats about the only purpose it could serve.

IMO, its not worth doing unless you do it all the way. Don't half-ass it like you were talking about in the original post. I'm with Reen on this one.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Apr 12, 2006
#9
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #9
Well, that's what the Fatman WonderBar system is. He uses the front half of single leaf springs as trailing arms, a Panhard bar to control lateral movement, and Air Ride Shockwaves. I've driven it with regular coilovers and it's OK. The rear of your car rises when you accelerate, which feels weird.

http://www.fatmanfab.com/06page20.htm
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Apr 12, 2006
#10
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #10
on that Fatman rear kit, do the bags mount to a new crossmember, or do they just bolt into the existing upper shock holes. I think most people know what happens when the upper shock holes are subjected to high load.
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Apr 12, 2006
#11
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #11
302 coupe said:
on that Fatman rear kit, do the bags mount to a new crossmember, or do they just bolt into the existing upper shock holes. I think most people know what happens when the upper shock holes are subjected to high load.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, it just bolts to the shock holes with a small reinforcement plate. That's one of the reasons why I'm not installing them.
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Apr 12, 2006
#12
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #12
what is it exactly that you plan on using your car for? to me the air ride seems like a waste of money. sure you can change your ride height, but you also have to deal with compressors as was mentioned above. Also, unless you can find a way to make the car ride at exactly the same height every time you bring it off of the pavement, then you're going to run into uneven tire wear on the front due to the camber change at different ride heights. If your car also suffers from any bump steer, then your toe angle will also change with ride height.
 
T

THX 138

Member
Oct 7, 2004
375
0
16
Los Angeles
Apr 12, 2006
#13
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #13
streetstang67 said:

I think your right that I'll loose lateral stability by removing leafs, so heres what i was thinking about. Using some tubing, make a rod to run from the front leaf spring mount back to the rear axle, which will hook up with u-bolts. Pretty much as if I cut the back half of the leaf spring off. Then I could put the airbag over the leaf or axle. Here's another pic, the only thing different is that I want to mount the bag on the front half, leaving the back void. I will also have to add a panhard bar. Please tell me what you think, I really need some feedback on this.


Click to expand...
What program is that? Catia? nice work.
 
H

HHStang

Member
May 15, 2003
566
0
16
Coastal SC
Apr 12, 2006
#14
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #14
DukeGnarley said:
what is it exactly that you plan on using your car for? to me the air ride seems like a waste of money. sure you can change your ride height, but you also have to deal with compressors as was mentioned above. Also, unless you can find a way to make the car ride at exactly the same height every time you bring it off of the pavement, then you're going to run into uneven tire wear on the front due to the camber change at different ride heights. If your car also suffers from any bump steer, then your toe angle will also change with ride height.
Click to expand...


All the new stuff is digital with memory, so the "remember what the settings were and alignment issues" aren't issues anymore...
 

streetstang67

Member
Mar 5, 2003
573
0
16
Lexington, SC
Apr 12, 2006
#15
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #15
This car is just pretty much a weekend car, mabye occasionally a daily driver during the summer, I don't care about 'layin frame', I would not need a resevoir air tank, only the compressor, because I won't be changing it much. The reason I want air is so I can adjust the suspension from haulin ass through back mountain roads to cruising smoothly down the interstate.

I guess I could deal with coil springs and leaf springs, but I'd have to go through every pair to find which stiffness I liked best...I just don't know, thats why i'm checking out all the options
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Apr 12, 2006
#16
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #16
HHStang said:
All the new stuff is digital with memory, so the "remember what the settings were and alignment issues" aren't issues anymore...
Click to expand...

I was unaware, and that is good to know
 

geneos5546

New Member
Feb 11, 2006
44
0
0
wisconsin
Apr 12, 2006
#17
  • Apr 12, 2006
  • #17
well i wanted air ride, till i talked to the ring brothers they build 200,000 show cars all mustangs mostly 65 -68 and they just did one with air ride 4000.00 just for parts from air ride technologies, and cant keep front tires on the car, so i will stick with mostly stock performance up grades, also they said total control rides like lumber wagon
 
H

HHStang

Member
May 15, 2003
566
0
16
Coastal SC
Apr 13, 2006
#18
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #18
Ring must pay double retail. It shouldn't cost more than $2,000-$2,500. Try godfatherscustoms.com. Call them, not online. Major discounter for Airride.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Apr 13, 2006
#19
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #19
THe biggest problem with air-ride suspensions is that the firmness of the suspension works backwards for how you would want it.

With the car at it's max height you want a soft confortable ride, instead you get a stiffer ride. With the car lowered, you want a stiff ride for control and to help keep from bottoming out. Instead the ride is at it's softest with the vehicle lowered.

Way better than hydrolics tho!
 

reenmachine

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 27, 2004
1,258
2
38
Montrose, CA
Apr 13, 2006
#20
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #20
HHStang said:
Ring must pay double retail. It shouldn't cost more than $2,000-$2,500. Try godfatherscustoms.com. Call them, not online. Major discounter for Airride.
Click to expand...
I think he means $4k for front and rear. That would make more sense.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 91GTstroked 90 7 up convertible build
  • 91GTstroked
  • Apr 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
334
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
91GTstroked
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
84
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
211
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
SN95 The Unicorn
  • HANO Motorsports
  • May 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
HANO Motorsports
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?