• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Am i using the right gas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jagerbeast
  • Start date Start date Apr 9, 2010
J

Jagerbeast

New Member
Mar 7, 2010
516
0
0
Virginia
Apr 9, 2010
#1
  • Apr 9, 2010
  • #1
I recently bought my 98 GT from a buddy of mine and he was telling me to just use 87 octane. Ive been going back and forth every tank between 87 and 89, which seems to be working out fine so far.

My real question is this:

I just ordered a diablo predator tuner from American Muscle, and to my understanding it has a tune for 93 octane, would it be in my best intrest to use that tune and start putting the higher grade gasoline in my car?

Does anyone know if theres a tune for mid range gas?
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Apr 9, 2010
#2
  • Apr 9, 2010
  • #2
You need to put in whatever gas the tune is programmed for. What the tune does is advance the spark timing a bit. If it does that, and the octane isn't high enough, pre-detonation will start happening, and very, very bad things will follow if that happens much. The higher octane tunes will advance the timing more (which gives you more power, maybe 10-15 hp worth), but you need to have the gas to match.

I can't speak for the Diablo, by my SCT had tunes for 87, 91, and 93 octane. I would think the Diablo would be similar.

And off topic, but why the Diablo and not the SCT? I don't know about the Diablo, but AM is doing free Bama Chips tunes for life on the SCT programmers, which is pretty awesome.
 
J

Jagerbeast

New Member
Mar 7, 2010
516
0
0
Virginia
Apr 9, 2010
#3
  • Apr 9, 2010
  • #3
Thanks for the response.


I went with the diablo one because some people from work gave it some good feedback. Now that you mention it, i did see that i can get custom tunes via email and such ... but im not sure if i will have to pay for them, probly something i should look into. Hopefully they will let me exchange if so.
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Apr 9, 2010
#4
  • Apr 9, 2010
  • #4
I believe that these cars are tuned to take advantage of higher octane from the get go, if it senses detonation it retards the timing... not saying it gives you much of a boost, but putting in higher octane keeps it away from the threshold of detonation, I guess you could say higher octane helps prevent power loss as opposed to improving power. At the very least I'd run 89, but I usually just put whatever is the highest available in... 92/93 octane.
 
J

Jagerbeast

New Member
Mar 7, 2010
516
0
0
Virginia
Apr 10, 2010
#5
  • Apr 10, 2010
  • #5
i did a search before i posted this thread.... and it looks as though using a higher octane than is actually needed would do more harm than good to the car.

But i guess if you have a tuner that will make your car run better/faster off of the higher octane then using it is preferred which is the part that had me confused.
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Apr 10, 2010
#6
  • Apr 10, 2010
  • #6
Jagerbeast said:
i did a search before i posted this thread.... and it looks as though using a higher octane than is actually needed would do more harm than good to the car.
Click to expand...

I don't believe that one bit. The only thing you'll do is maybe waste some money paying for a higher grade than you need. If you run too low, it will lead to detonation eventually, whether it happens on the dragstrip at full throttle or climbing a steep hill, eventually you'll get detonation. And THAT is not beneficial to your car. Occasional detonation will not really hurt the car, but it will hurt power because of the computer's retardation of advance. So don't take this as me saying that it is harmful to the car to run 87 in a modern performance engine, but at some point it is going to hamper you if just by a few horsepower.

I know the NPI 4.6 is not quite the same as my motor, but I could have swore in my driver's manual I read that Ford recommend at 91 octane or higher.
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Apr 10, 2010
#7
  • Apr 10, 2010
  • #7
Jagerbeast said:
But i guess if you have a tuner that will make your car run better/faster off of the higher octane then using it is preferred
Click to expand...

thats the thing though. if you have a tune that is for '93 octane' then 93 octane is REQUIRED. you put in anything less youre looking for trouble
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Apr 10, 2010
#8
  • Apr 10, 2010
  • #8
ChillPhatCat said:
I believe that these cars are tuned to take advantage of higher octane from the get go, if it senses detonation it retards the timing...
Click to expand...

The 2V mod motor doesn't have knock sensors and so the factory tune was fairly conservative to ensure the cars would run on 87 without detonation issues.

The general sentiment is correct though: If you're stock, 87 is fine and more octane won't do anything other than drain the wallet. If you have a Diablo or SCT (etc) tuner, the fuel grade you need to run will be dictated in large part by the tune loaded. If you go F/I you should run the best street gas you can find no matter what.
 
J

Jagerbeast

New Member
Mar 7, 2010
516
0
0
Virginia
Apr 10, 2010
#9
  • Apr 10, 2010
  • #9
I cant seem to find the thread that was talking about this for the life of me. I believe (if i can remember correctly) it stated that using 93 octane in a car that really only neeeds 87 would cause the 93 to not burn 100% and leave some residue of sorts? Damn i wish i could find that thread
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Apr 10, 2010
#10
  • Apr 10, 2010
  • #10
trinity_gt said:
The 2V mod motor doesn't have knock sensors and so the factory tune was fairly conservative to ensure the cars would run on 87 without detonation issues.
Click to expand...

Huh... oh well, I sure thought I read that they did.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Apr 10, 2010
#11
  • Apr 10, 2010
  • #11
Jagerbeast said:
I cant seem to find the thread that was talking about this for the life of me. I believe (if i can remember correctly) it stated that using 93 octane in a car that really only neeeds 87 would cause the 93 to not burn 100% and leave some residue of sorts? Damn i wish i could find that thread
Click to expand...

Octane is only a measure of a fuel's resistance to auto-ignition (more commonly termed "detonation.") Increases in octane is typically achieved by specific blending the component parts of the fuels and by additives like MMT.

It's the additives like MMT that can cause deposits and fouling of parts like spark plugs and O2 sensors. Likewise, aside from the environmental and health concerns of tetraethyl lead, the fouling of catalytic converters was a major driving force of getting the stuff out of motor fuel. MMT is raising the same sort of concerns. Not all higher octane fuels use such additives or they do so in varying quantities.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Apr 10, 2010
#12
  • Apr 10, 2010
  • #12
ChillPhatCat said:
Huh... oh well, I sure thought I read that they did.
Click to expand...

The 4V has them
 

Ateup

Active Member
Sep 21, 2009
748
2
28
Apr 10, 2010
#13
  • Apr 10, 2010
  • #13
http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/799655-who-uses-premium-gas-their-2v-4-6-a.html
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Apr 10, 2010
#14
  • Apr 10, 2010
  • #14
Jagerbeast said:
I cant seem to find the thread that was talking about this for the life of me. I believe (if i can remember correctly) it stated that using 93 octane in a car that really only neeeds 87 would cause the 93 to not burn 100% and leave some residue of sorts? Damn i wish i could find that thread
Click to expand...

Yup. I've heard the same thing. Put whatever gas in it the tune calls for.
 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Apr 11, 2010
#15
  • Apr 11, 2010
  • #15
trinity_gt said:
The 2V mod motor doesn't have knock sensors and so the factory tune was fairly conservative to ensure the cars would run on 87 without detonation issues.

The general sentiment is correct though: If you're stock, 87 is fine and more octane won't do anything other than drain the wallet. If you have a Diablo or SCT (etc) tuner, the fuel grade you need to run will be dictated in large part by the tune loaded. If you go F/I you should run the best street gas you can find no matter what.
Click to expand...

Dosn't the the Crankshaft positioning sensor do the same thing? I'm positive that the Cam shaft and the Crankshaft act the same, Piezoelectric same as a knock sensor. If there is was a repeated knock wouldn't that throw off the timing and the crankshaft a bit.
Also, the computer advances and decreases timing based on the driving habits and the MAF sensor. We are talking about pretty advanced computers that can and will sense what gas your using. If this was like say early 90s then yes I wouldn't use a higher octane gas than what the manual says.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Nightmare after tune install!
  • EnemyofTyranny
  • Mar 29, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
415
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 12, 2025
89ripper
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
P
4 Hole Bosch Injectors max HP and Tune -4.6 PI
  • Png1978
  • Jul 23, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2022
Chipss36
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?