http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/car/221535516.html
I really like the stance.
Anybody know this car?
I really like the stance.
Anybody know this car?
nonglossjason said:Something just bugs me that people do that kinda stuff to a svo, if they wanted that why didnt they just get a gt and put a 2.3t in it? They are rare and i kick myself in the ass for letting mine go but it doesnt look bad but in the first pick what is up with the leveling of the seats
Craigslist Dude said:AGAIN IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR A PERFECT SVO THIS IS NOT THE CAR FOR YOU BUT IF YOU LIKE SVO PERFORMANCE, HANDLING AND MILEAGE & WANT SOMETHING THAT LOOKS BETTER THIS IS IT.
yea no kidding... if I had the money laying around I'd pick that up as a ddstock50LX said:IT looks just like my car... I don't think you are going to beat the price.
wythors said:If my wife wouldn't kick my assss into next week, I'd go give that car a serious look.

grover said:You could always pick it up and hide it at my house with all your christmas presents.I might even be able to find garage spot for it if you come take a couch off my hands.
![]()
86crazyhorse said:its just not the same .its not worth anything being that altered. you might as well go buy any fox body with a 2.3 turbo swap.and to get it back to factory you are looking at a pretty penny to make it stock .their was a 89 with a 2.3 turbo swap in portland for a grand on craigslist.
exactly how I feel its a sweet car. Why wont it need to be tested anymore ?stock50LX said:I don't look at it that way. I see a very clean well cared for car that will soon need no emissions testing. The fact that is not badged as an SVO just makes it cheaper and a better value for money in my book.
