• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Any differences between new edge GT's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhiteDevil
  • Start date Start date Jun 10, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Jun 10, 2008
#1
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #1
Well im moving on from my old stang and looking to get a 00-03 GT. I am just wondering if there are any advantages or disadvantages to any years. Or any major differences between the years. School me guys, Thanks!
 

T-Sho

New Member
Jul 31, 2006
56
0
0
Jun 10, 2008
#2
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #2
I believe the 00-03 GTs are basically the same performance wise with only a few cosmetic changes
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Jun 10, 2008
#3
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #3
T-Sho said:
I believe the 00-03 GTs are basically the same performance wise with only a few cosmetic changes
Click to expand...

I know performance wise they are the same. Im just wondering what cosmetic changes or interior changes there were. Also i know there is a switch from T-45 to T-3650 or something like that at some point as well. But im not sure which is better and when the change happened.
 

GT-03

Member
Dec 12, 2003
630
1
16
Jun 10, 2008
#4
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #4
The '03 and '04 have much thicker A-pillars. Its for better rollover safety.

The console design changed somewhere in SN95's, at least a few times.
 
N

Nightstick

New Member
Jul 1, 2007
68
0
0
Jun 10, 2008
#5
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #5
WhiteDevil said:
Well im moving on from my old stang and looking to get a 00-03 GT. I am just wondering if there are any advantages or disadvantages to any years. Or any major differences between the years. School me guys, Thanks!
Click to expand...

01' was first year for Bullitt rims, taller hood scoop, and factory tinted headlights.
I think I read somewhere the 01's harmonic balancer has most mass of all previous years of 96' up. Mass air sensor wiring is slightly different on the 02-04s.
Mid year of 01, the 3650 5-speed was swapped in(supposedly more robust than the T-45). Rear defogger button is moved down to console instead of dash on 01'.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Jun 10, 2008
#6
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #6
so i definitely like the blacked out head lights. SO ill have to focus on an 01+ for that. See this is the info that helps me make a choice! Keep it comin guys!
 

Wolvrin704

Member
Apr 17, 2007
120
0
17
Milford, OH
Jun 10, 2008
#7
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #7
Also I may be wrong but I believe for the 03 and 04 they went to the adjustable tilting head rests. Mine is an 03 and I have it so I'm unsure about previous years. I like the look of my 03 so much that I really don't plan on many cosmetic changes. DD bullits on back and another Mach 1 chin spoiler are about all I'll be doing.
 
8

89lxsport50

10 Year Member
Feb 25, 2003
550
5
39
Franklin Tennessee
Jun 10, 2008
#8
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #8
02 was the first year with the aluminum crossover on the intake instead of plastic.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jun 10, 2008
#9
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #9
89lxsport50 said:
02 was the first year with the aluminum crossover on the intake instead of plastic.
Click to expand...

2001 and 1/2 technically...



99-00 4.6's are Windsor motors, 01-04 are Romeo. A few small differences between the engines, but none that will affect the power a car from either year(s) would make.

00-mid 2001 still have the T-45. Not as "strong" but ill be damned if it isnt 3x more reliable than the 3650's are. Mine shifts smooth as butter with almost 130k abusive miles on it.

I beleive (correct me if im wrong please) either 2001 or 2002 got larger fuel injectors, 99-00/01 were 19lbs/hr and the newer ones are 21lbs/hr I beleive.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,172
17,871
224
Massachusetts
Jun 10, 2008
#10
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #10
Wolvrin704 said:
Also I may be wrong but I believe for the 03 and 04 they went to the adjustable tilting head rests. Mine is an 03 and I have it so I'm unsure about previous years.
Click to expand...


The 4-way tilting headrests were available on 03's and '04's that got the Interior Upgrade Package. If you didn't get the package, you still got the normal small headrests.



02-03's also have an overhead storage net that was deleted in '04.


I think the interior of the 01+ is nicer. You get the 6-disk in-dash cd changer and the damn defrost button isn't under the headlight switch.



Basically...buy the newest mustang with the least amount of miles you can afford. It's a buyer's market out there. Beleive me...i know. I've gone from $13K to $10K for my '03 GT and still can't sell it.
 

Mach1Run

New Member
Jun 25, 2004
333
2
0
Wylie, Texas
Jun 10, 2008
#11
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #11
WhiteDevil said:
I know performance wise they are the same. Im just wondering what cosmetic changes or interior changes there were. Also i know there is a switch from T-45 to T-3650 or something like that at some point as well. But im not sure which is better and when the change happened.
Click to expand...

Mid year 2001
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Jun 10, 2008
#12
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #12
Basicly 2001-2004 look the same in and out, the 99-00s had the 98 interior, no hood scope, different wing and standard white head lights (01-04 are blacked out).
 
N

Nightstick

New Member
Jul 1, 2007
68
0
0
Jun 10, 2008
#13
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #13
For 2002 the Mach 1000 audio system with MP3 capability was available with 2 subs and 4 amps in the trunk....
 

00stangv6lr

New Member
Sep 25, 2006
61
0
0
Omaha, NE
Jun 11, 2008
#14
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #14
I was told from a ford service tech that the 03-04 models had more threads in the head to help with spark blug blowouts, someone please correct me if this is wrong though.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,172
17,871
224
Massachusetts
Jun 11, 2008
#15
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #15
I think they changed the spark plug and not the head.


I've seen plenty of 03/04's still spit the plugs
 

Mach1Run

New Member
Jun 25, 2004
333
2
0
Wylie, Texas
Jun 11, 2008
#16
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #16
00stangv6lr said:
I was told from a ford service tech that the 03-04 models had more threads in the head to help with spark blug blowouts, someone please correct me if this is wrong though.
Click to expand...

there is a difference in heads, at least on the machs. some heads take 4 turns to seat the plug. these were the ones prone to blowout. if it has the revised heads its should take about 8.
 

T-Sho

New Member
Jul 31, 2006
56
0
0
Jun 11, 2008
#17
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #17
Mustang5L5 said:
Basically...buy the newest mustang with the least amount of miles you can afford. It's a buyer's market out there. Beleive me...i know. I've gone from $13K to $10K for my '03 GT and still can't sell it.
Click to expand...

Yeah I know. Nobody wants a gas guzzling V8 with gas prices the way they are But it works for me because I'm planning on getting something new within the next year or so .
 

2000fordstanggt

Member
Sep 6, 2005
404
1
16
Westland, MI
Jun 11, 2008
#18
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #18
i was at the relvealing of the new lincoln mks at the dealer monday and was looking at the window sticker of the mkx x-over/suv (whatever it is) and the fuel economy rating was something like 17 city and 24 highway, with a 3.5 liter!
im getting way better than that, must be pretty heavy i guess.
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Jun 11, 2008
#19
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #19
BurningRubber said:
I beleive (correct me if im wrong please) either 2001 or 2002 got larger fuel injectors, 99-00/01 were 19lbs/hr and the newer ones are 21lbs/hr I beleive.
Click to expand...

They are all 19lbs injectors, orange or pink they are the same.

The 04's did get a revised head with more thread on the spark plugs.

Depending on what you are looking to spend you can find some great deals on Mach 1's also.

The funny thing is so many consider a V8 Mustang to be a gas guzzler yet mine gets consisently 21-22 MPG driving back and forth to work. That's close to double what my diesel truck was getting and it cut my monthly fuel costs down 60%.

Bill
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,172
17,871
224
Massachusetts
Jun 11, 2008
#20
  • Jun 11, 2008
  • #20
If you toss it in 5th the Mustang actually gets decent fuel economy. My window sticker says 25MPG highway i beleive.

A lot of the V6's i'm looking at for a new car are rated at about the same.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
148
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
582
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
P
Hello, core supports for '86 vs '90-3, i need some answers if anyone knows
  • Pony Dr.Mike
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
7
Views
248
The Welcome Wagon Mar 15, 2026
95steedamustang
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
229
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
R
New mustang
  • Roach88
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
180
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?