Anylize my slightly better Dyno Chart

WhiteDevil

New Member

Feb 4, 2003

2,717

0

0

San Diego

Nov 14, 2004

#1

• Nov 14, 2004

• #1

All mods in the sig. 13 degrees timing. It was pouring rain outside when i was on the dyno, so i would imagine the humidity was exteremly high. Check out the numbers and let me know what you think.

Dyno Sheet

 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member

Apr 6, 2003

2,018

0

0

Tampa Palms, FL

Nov 14, 2004

#2

• Nov 14, 2004

• #2

It looks really good to me. The hp is still low in the RPM range, so that's a good sign. A more aggressive cam would of course gain more hp, but the driveability will fall a bit.

 

9

95redSVT

New Member

Dec 20, 2003

35

0

0

Nov 14, 2004

#3

• Nov 14, 2004

• #3

Pretty good numbers there. Like S/CBlack95GT said good hp though the lower RPMs. You dont want to get too much hp too fast though unless your running 16 inch slicks. Its why ill always think turbos over s/c for 1/4 miles. Turbo lag (as bad as it sounds) can save your ass in a race. 1st and 2nd can be a bitch to hold with high hp/tourqe at low. Turbos really kick you in the ass when you punch the top end of 2nd and 3ed so by then you wont spin your tires. Then again for SCCA racing a s/c is good for the low rpm/gear power. Its all about how you drive your ride.

 

WhiteDevil

New Member

Feb 4, 2003

2,717

0

0

San Diego

Nov 14, 2004

#4

• Nov 14, 2004

• #4

S/CBlack95GT said:

The hp is still low in the RPM range, so that's a good sign. A more aggressive cam would of course gain more hp, but the driveability will fall a bit.

Click to expand...

Yeah the crane said power from 1500-5500 so its doing what it said it would. I think when i get my tweecer next month i might be able to bring it up a little.

 

Dan95-5.0

Active Member

Jun 14, 2003

1,110

0

36

Manitoba, Canada

Nov 14, 2004

#5

• Nov 14, 2004

• #5

pretty good numbers for an off the shelf cam.

cant wait to order mine

 

W

wytstang

Mustang Master

Mar 14, 2004

4,988

4

78

Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(

Nov 14, 2004

#6

• Nov 14, 2004

• #6

298.4 @ 5370 rpms and 326.2 @ 4050 rpms with an off the self cam that's great. Glad to see e-brock heads making some good #'s you don't see them much here on this board.

 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!

Founding Member

Jan 14, 2001

6,819

64

129

New York

Nov 15, 2004

#7

• Nov 15, 2004

• #7

Whitedevil, longtubes are callin your name man! Also, richen it up a little bit up top.

wytstang, my friend is making 323hp/348tq with new edelbrocks on a 10.5:1 306 with ALL off the shelf stuff, nothing fancy under his hood and thats with junk shorty headers. The heads are milled and have a little bowl work but unported. He runs a comp 270 cam with a 1.7 rocker and a TFS street intake. All the power is under 6000

 

95snoozer

Active Member

Dec 14, 2002

2,572

1

48

RCR

Nov 15, 2004

#8

• Nov 15, 2004

• #8

actually form that dyno, your car would make more power a little leaner up top. moving form 13.4 to 13.5 this is if you are comfortable running that. If it doesnt ping, have at it. maybe try a tad bit of timing, then a little more fuel teh next pass at the track and see the effect on your runs and your mph.

 

GTJake

Founding Member

Oct 28, 2002

3,049

0

56

Ann Arbor, MI

Nov 15, 2004

#9

• Nov 15, 2004

• #9

Weird that it peaks so low with the RPM on there. Could be the cam Looks good though. You should be able to get a more agressive timing curve with the tweecer.

Jake