• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Anyone have solid motor mounts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wicked93gs
  • Start date Start date Jun 21, 2009

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jun 21, 2009
#1
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #1
Just curious as to how bad they really are in a classic mustang...I'll be using a 4.6L engine so it will be a good deal smoother at idle than a pushrod, but I am looking for impressions from anyone who has them in a classic mustang. I have solid mounts in my Neon and actually dont mind them at all, the engine is nice and smooth, and the only time the vibration is noticeable is at some part throttle areas, and the vibration itself doesnt bother me....the only annoying thing is the rearview mirror vibration(have to use my side mirrors) the mustang wont be a daily driver, so if its no worse than the neon, its perfectly acceptable....the one other thing in the neon is...the exhaust is quiet, but the solid mounts transmit engine noise to the frame, amplifying the sound of the engine inside the car almost to the point it becomes annoying(just not quite) I'm looking for feedback similar to that
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jun 21, 2009
#2
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #2
I welded brackets on the driver side of mine but left the other side stock. I couldn't really tell a difference except not twisting the motor over under load.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jun 21, 2009
#3
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #3
I had a friend with solid motor mounts and a 393 and I could hardly tell it had solids. I am curious why a 4.6 has less vibration than a push rod motor? They are both 90* V8s and a 4.6 has a longer stroke than a 351 and rods about as long.
 
C

Cobra ssc

Member
May 31, 2006
80
0
7
Austin, TX
Jun 21, 2009
#4
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #4
You will be fine, just don't use a solid tranny mount also...
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jun 21, 2009
#5
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #5
wasnt planning on a solid tranny mount..but anyway, thanks for the input...I think I'll make some solid mounts...which simplifies my install somewhat
 

mrmustangman357

Member
Feb 11, 2007
763
3
18
Jun 21, 2009
#6
  • Jun 21, 2009
  • #6
if you are fabing from scratch why not put a poly bushing link in?
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jun 22, 2009
#7
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • #7
I had considered that, but just cant seem to find ones that looked like they might be big enough...or any really good options for that matter....not to mention no one has any locally, so it would be either hit or miss with anything I ordered without knowing what I really needed
 
5

5280/4

New Member
May 21, 2009
201
0
0
Jun 23, 2009
#8
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #8
i have stock configuration mounts on my falcon but with aluminum rectagular extrusion instead of rubber. so an easy way to make solid motor mounts. on my 65 mustang i bought ron morris motor mounts. both have small block fords but are high reving and no vibration transfer to the chassis
 

TD68302

New Member
Jul 29, 2007
57
0
0
Arvada, CO.
Jun 23, 2009
#9
  • Jun 23, 2009
  • #9
I took brand new rubber mounts, drilled 3/8" holes through them installed 3/8" grade 8 nut & bolts, turning them into soild mounts because they can't flex. I did not notice much of a differance, I have no problems with them. I like them and much cheaper then soild monts.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 24, 2009
#10
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #10
TD68302 said:
I took brand new rubber mounts, drilled 3/8" holes through them installed 3/8" grade 8 nut & bolts, turning them into soild mounts because they can't flex. I did not notice much of a differance, I have no problems with them. I like them and much cheaper then soild monts.
Click to expand...

That's a tried and true back-country fix. If you put a rubber bushing under the bolt head at one end, it doesn't even make the mount more harsh.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jun 24, 2009
#11
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #11
well, I dont really have that option with a 4.6L....to me its cheaper by far to make solid mounts than even stock motor mounts cost(things are cheap when you custom fab everything from plate steel)
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 24, 2009
#12
  • Jun 24, 2009
  • #12
Seems like it would be a simple matter to fab brackets that would attach to the stock 4.6 Mustang mounts

 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jun 25, 2009
#13
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #13
It was simple, until I got to the driver's side....the problem is the steering linkage...which when used with the stock motor mounts kinda tends to go right through where the bracket needs to be, that picture shows mounts of the type that might be found on a crown vic, or possibly a mustang, I have mark viii mounts, which are completely different and mount straight down as opposed to a 45, the same type of mounts that are on T-birds with 4.6L engines...it would be simple to buy some mustang mounts....but the dealer wants $200 a piece, which is ridiculous when I can just make my own...besides I dont really want stock rubber mounts anyway, I would prefer better power transfer...I'll take some pictures tonight of what I am wrking with so far
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 25, 2009
#14
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #14
wicked93gs said:
...it would be simple to buy some mustang mounts....but the dealer wants $200 a piece, which is ridiculous when I can just make my own...besides I dont really want stock rubber mounts anyway, …
Click to expand...

Well, you must be shopping the wrong places, the 2004 mounts are $28.79 each at Rock Auto.



Why don't you want "rubber" mounts? The way they are constructed I doubt you'd get 1/4" of movement even at max torque, and they're indestructible by federal law. If that's too much movement, you could get urethane mounts for $140 for the pair from Summit.

 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jun 25, 2009
#15
  • Jun 25, 2009
  • #15
ok, here is what I have...this is the mark viii mount with a frame bracket i fabbed for the passenger side



you cant really see it but it mounts vertically...the whole assembly takes up a good deal of space and I am unhappy with it

this is the drivers side space I have to work with

front of engine

from up under where the exhaust manifold will be

very limited space here, the steering linkage is almost certain to interfere with any similar mount over here

so I picked these up today...

I think they are from a crown vic or something along those lines...I think they will adapt more easily to my application than the huge mark vii ones(I will try them as they are and if I am unhappy with the flex I will weld plates to make them solid, or possibly take the inserts out and re-pour them with Urethane


on another note...I noticed the crown Vic oil filter/water pipe assembly was also better...it didnt have the oil pressure sensor extension sticking so far down it hits the steering rack...it also puts the water pipe at a better location
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jun 26, 2009
#16
  • Jun 26, 2009
  • #16
2+2GT, just curious as to whether thats a pic from your car...if not would you happen to know whose it is? I am curious as to the distance between those two pieces of tubing...also it looks like 2" tubing, trying to figure out if thats the case....trying to do the numbers and see where my mounts will end up...right now after test fitting the driver's side mount it still looks close to interfering with the steering linkage unless I re-design it again
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 27, 2009
#17
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #17
wicked93gs said:
2+2GT, just curious as to whether thats a pic from your car...if not would you happen to know whose it is? I am curious as to the distance between those two pieces of tubing...also it looks like 2" tubing, trying to figure out if thats the case....trying to do the numbers and see where my mounts will end up...right now after test fitting the driver's side mount it still looks close to interfering with the steering linkage unless I re-design it again
Click to expand...

No, not my car. I do have access to a 66 with a 4.6 DOHC in it, but the custom headers make the mounts a little hard to see. Am am wondering how the motor mounts interfere with the steering, though.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jun 27, 2009
#18
  • Jun 27, 2009
  • #18
look at the picture with the oil filter and the steering rack splined end...there really isnt much room...there is maybe 1/2 inch between the spines on the rack connection and the motor mount
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jun 28, 2009
#19
  • Jun 28, 2009
  • #19
alright, an update, this is what I came up with....this method gave me the most clearance for the steering linkage...I have a feeling the header over here i going to be a PITA too, I'll have to twist it around the linkage somehow, anyway some pics

note the rough notch for the steering linkage



and installed...temporarily...

from the top...though I will add a bit more bracing before its all the way finished

from the back(camera held sideways) you can see the splines of the linkage here

best of all...I ended up with 3 degrees...perfect, also perfectly centered between the frame rails...within 1/32 ofan inch anyway

an overall shot of the engine bay now that its sitting on real mounts...although I have to re-do the passenger side mount to match now
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
517
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
S
what would you do? sell the project and buy completed or finish project?
  • STANG32
  • Feb 8, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
571
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2025
rusty428cj
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 16, 2024
revhead347
N
i6 to v8 motor/frame mounts
  • nerlansnoel
  • Aug 6, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2021
horse sence
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?