• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Anyone running 2.5" exhaust through a 65-66 GT style valence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cannoball888
  • Start date Start date Sep 20, 2006

Cannoball888

New Member
Dec 25, 2005
320
0
0
Gainesville, FL
Sep 20, 2006
#1
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #1
I originally was planning 3" but may just get 2.5" for simplicity. Anyone know of fitment issues running 2.5" pipes out the valence?
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Sep 20, 2006
#2
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #2
They fit just fine.
 
D

DrStang

New Member
Aug 22, 2004
41
0
0
Sep 20, 2006
#3
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #3
I've got 3"' pipes running out. Fit is tight but it works.

}
 
1

1966conv

New Member
Mar 5, 2004
220
0
0
Sep 20, 2006
#4
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #4
Same answer I gave in the other location. LOL
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Sep 20, 2006
#5
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #5
Me, too.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Sep 20, 2006
#6
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #6
I have 2 1/2" pipe to the rear of the car and then added 3" chrome extensions through the GT holes. The driver's side tailpipe runs close to the fuel tank. I added a radius to the tank to create more clearance.

 

Cannoball888

New Member
Dec 25, 2005
320
0
0
Gainesville, FL
Sep 20, 2006
#7
  • Sep 20, 2006
  • #7
dennis112 said:
I added a radius to the tank to create more clearance.
Click to expand...

Does that mean percussion engineered?
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Sep 21, 2006
#8
  • Sep 21, 2006
  • #8
Cannoball888 said:
Does that mean percussion engineered?
Click to expand...

LOL, yeah, just a little.

I wanted to make sure I had at least 1/2" of clearance there.

I used a piece of 2" black pipe on its side and created a nice round crease along rear most side of the tank, near the GT opening. It was a really easy mod as the tank side offers little resistance.
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Sep 21, 2006
#9
  • Sep 21, 2006
  • #9
Hey Cannonball, I work for Magnaflow and you will be better off going with the 2.5"

not that the 3" does not fit great which it does-

But I am running a supercharged 5.0 in my fastback and getting ready to do a head cam swap to put it somewhere in the neighbor hood of 450rwhp-

and I am sticking with 2.5"-

You have to be making some pretty serious power- over 500 rwhp (550-575 crank) to start looking at 3"
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Sep 22, 2006
#10
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #10
I also have the 2.5" exhaust running out the rear valance

 

67Thunder

New Member
Jun 19, 2005
101
0
0
Vancouver, Canada
Sep 22, 2006
#11
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #11
Question, on the magnaflow 2.5" exhaust is the inside diameter of the pipe 2.5" or outside, if it's the inside diameter of the pipe, what is the outside diameter?

thanks
 

Cannoball888

New Member
Dec 25, 2005
320
0
0
Gainesville, FL
Sep 22, 2006
#12
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #12
GNN60GT500 said:
Hey Cannonball, I work for Magnaflow and you will be better off going with the 2.5"

not that the 3" does not fit great which it does-

But I am running a supercharged 5.0 in my fastback and getting ready to do a head cam swap to put it somewhere in the neighbor hood of 450rwhp-

and I am sticking with 2.5"-
Click to expand...
The goal is the same for my 65 FB with a 306 roller so I was wondering about 2.5 vs 3" for the supercharger. Thanks for answering my question.
 
D

DrStang

New Member
Aug 22, 2004
41
0
0
Sep 22, 2006
#13
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #13
I made an error on my previous post. These are 3.5" pipes. The exhaust is 2.5" however. Just wanted a different look for the rear.


 
S

Stanger'66

Member
Apr 30, 2006
31
0
6
Sep 22, 2006
#14
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #14
So the SS Magnaflow system WILL fit a GT valance? I always saw the tips on those systems installed below the valance, not in it. If it fits, I'll buy one.
Grant
 

Cannoball888

New Member
Dec 25, 2005
320
0
0
Gainesville, FL
Sep 22, 2006
#15
  • Sep 22, 2006
  • #15
You'll have to get an exhaust shop to modify it for valence exit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
946
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
DTCRAWLEY
D
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
274
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
1
Possible bad pcm? Stumped
  • 12stang5.0
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
251
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Jul 14, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?