• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

anyone seen a rear mount turbo on fox body?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tanus
  • Start date Start date Dec 12, 2009

Tanus

New Member
Dec 11, 2009
847
1
0
A to the Z
Dec 12, 2009
#1
  • Dec 12, 2009
  • #1
Ive seen the rear mount turbo/s on vettes and newer stangs but never on a fox, anyone have that or pics or even hear of it?
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Dec 12, 2009
#2
  • Dec 12, 2009
  • #2
One of the 94-95 guys did it. It should work on a Fox, although the intake system may be a bit different.
 

hotrodredneck

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
200
0
0
Newport News Va
Dec 13, 2009
#3
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #3
like this?....lol


 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Dec 13, 2009
#4
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #4
I think that's a bit excessive, but it'd work!
 

beyondspexj

Member
Oct 30, 2009
265
0
17
Las Vegas
Dec 13, 2009
#5
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #5
haha i was thinking of the same one..


on a more serious note, i doubt it would work well without running a fuel cell since the oem tank is so large.
 

Tanus

New Member
Dec 11, 2009
847
1
0
A to the Z
Dec 13, 2009
#6
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #6
StangGT1995 said:
One of the 94-95 guys did it. It should work on a Fox, although the intake system may be a bit different.
Click to expand...
thanks, very interesting thread. think Im gonna try to setup a single turbo, not to big either. I have @ 300-320 rwhp right now, like to get like 400-420 rwhp, but with a real wide and torquey powerband. I think thats a pretty realistic goal. once I sell my streetbike I'll have like 2 G's to put towards it, thnk most of the cost will be the fuel system and tuning.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 13, 2009
#7
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #7
My buddy built up a home made twin rear set up with his 351W powered '82 GT. Went pretty good. engine had nothing more than an E-cam, ported E7TE's and Performer intake and under boost it ran 11.20's@117mph.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Dec 13, 2009
#8
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #8
You'd honestly be better served keeping it in the engine compartment, for ease of installation if nothing more. Put it in the driver's front corner, run it through the intercooler and right up into the intake on the passenger's side. I can understand if you're going for the hidden look of the remote mount setup, but aside from that, it doesn't have much benefit. You can buy U bends and header flanges from Jegs, or Summit and make up your own hot side with fairly relative ease, if you're mechanically inclined enough and know how to weld.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 13, 2009
#9
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #9
StangGT1995 said:
You'd honestly be better served keeping it in the engine compartment, for ease of installation if nothing more. Put it in the driver's front corner, run it through the intercooler and right up into the intake on the passenger's side. I can understand if you're going for the hidden look of the remote mount setup, but aside from that, it doesn't have much benefit. You can buy U bends and header flanges from Jegs, or Summit and make up your own hot side with fairly relative ease, if you're mechanically inclined enough and know how to weld.
Click to expand...


I wouldn't say it didn't offer "much benefit" The rear mounting cuts the otherwise pistol hot under hood temps considerably compared to an under hood set up. Not to mention it keeps the additional 60+lbs of weight out back, closer to the rear wheels instead of over top of the K-member where you want it the least. The ACT's dissipate several degrees during the trip from the back, to the front of the car as well.

I wasn't a big fan of the rear mount set up initially as well, but as far as pro's vs. con's, it doesn't seem so bad.

Not to mention it leaves plenty of room in the engine bay for the components of a second power adder for those looking to make some serious street power.
 

beyondspexj

Member
Oct 30, 2009
265
0
17
Las Vegas
Dec 13, 2009
#10
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #10
Gearbanger 101 said:
My buddy built up a home made twin rear set up with his 351W powered '82 GT. Went pretty good. engine had nothing more than an E-cam, ported E7TE's and Performer intake and under boost it ran 11.20's@117mph.
Click to expand...


pics by any change?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 13, 2009
#11
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • #11
beyondspexj said:
pics by any change?
Click to expand...

I'll Email him and see if he's still got some pics of the system. He's since disassembled it and sold the car.

He's one of those guys that gets bored quickly. His current project is a Mazda RX7 with a warmed over 5.0L HO under the hood.



....personally, I think he was better off with his Mustang.
 

beyondspexj

Member
Oct 30, 2009
265
0
17
Las Vegas
Dec 14, 2009
#12
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #12
i love a 5.0 , 350sb or a lsx swapped FC RX7 lol. almost had a chance to buy a 89 rx7 with a 302 in it, but dude was too far away.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Dec 14, 2009
#13
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #13
hotrodredneck said:
like this?....lol


Click to expand...



that car is soooooooo sexy now
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Dec 14, 2009
#14
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #14
It seems like a rear mount system would have slow throttle response issues and possibly make lag more of an issue... But I can't say I know a lot about rear mount turbos, so don't quote me on that.

Also, it seems like routing the intake tubes under the car would definitely be a PITA.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Dec 14, 2009
#15
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #15
NikwoaC said:
It seems like a rear mount system would have slow throttle response issues and possibly make lag more of an issue... But I can't say I know a lot about rear mount turbos, so don't quote me on that.

Also, it seems like routing the intake tubes under the car would definitely be a PITA.
Click to expand...

Negative, i was in a 800rwhp newer GTO with twins on it, and that thing had less turbo lag than my old 265hp WRX. If they are set up right, just like any other turbo setup then there is little to no lag. It is easy to assume there would be more lag with more piping, but it wasnt the case at all.

That car was fricken BA, 408 LS motor, th400 with a gear vendors OD, making 800 on like 15 lbs of boost. killer street car.

Remote mounts are great in rides like that goat where there is no room for a turbo, but in our cars its kinda pointless cause there is plenty of room under the hood. I'd be scared of a pothole taking out a turbo if they were under the car.
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Dec 14, 2009
#16
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #16
I dont want to say its pointless but i dont think the benefits are worth it.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Dec 15, 2009
#17
  • Dec 15, 2009
  • #17
90lxcoupe said:
That car was fricken BA, 408 LS motor, th400 with a gear vendors OD, making 800 on like 15 lbs of boost. killer street car.
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Rear ends? And I don't mean the pretty kind.
  • WORTH
  • Jun 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
940
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 14, 2025
limp
Lost my Foxbody
  • Mhalc1
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
737
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
Mhalc1
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
408
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
649
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?