• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

ANYONE TRIED EDELBROCK AIRGAP

  • Thread starter Thread starter MONTTU
  • Start date Start date Jul 2, 2004
M

MONTTU

New Member
Jul 2, 2004
7
0
0
Jul 2, 2004
#1
  • Jul 2, 2004
  • #1
I am hesitating with choosing of intake manifold. 1966 HT Stang, 302 Mexican block, flat top wiseco pistons decked, 298 home ported ( cleaned ) heads (10:1), XE268H cam, long headers, 4-speed manual tranny. Performer RPM or Performer RPM airgap ?? Does it fit under the bonnet ??
 

NorCal66

New Member
Aug 12, 2003
334
0
0
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA HOME
Jul 2, 2004
#2
  • Jul 2, 2004
  • #2
While some argue that there isnt' much difference between the two, dyno tests continue to prove that the Air-Gap does make more power. I have one on my 302 and love it. It does fit under a stock hood.
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Jul 3, 2004
#3
  • Jul 3, 2004
  • #3
I have the air-gap and it fits under my hood (i have a drop base air cleaner 14x3)

You will be VERY happy with it, performence wise AND the way it looks.. Im still awating to choose my cam, im thinking the 280H and some head work while its apart will really make good use of the intake ( but it seems you have allready done that) so i vote for the Air-gap
 
6

66SilverStar

New Member
Jul 23, 2003
61
0
0
Alabama
Jul 3, 2004
#4
  • Jul 3, 2004
  • #4
i've got one on a 351w but it wont fit under a stock hood with an aircleaner. however it looks good and it has an excellent throttle response. its better than the regular rpm because the air gap gives it a cooler denser air flow charge into the cylinder.

jimmie
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Jul 3, 2004
#5
  • Jul 3, 2004
  • #5
The 351W is about a half inch taller than your 289 so you should be fine. I haven't installed mine yet, but based on reading a half dozen intake dyno tests, it seems to be the best of both worlds: it wins on the bottom end compared to dual plane intakes and just about matches a single plane on the top end.
 
B

bull999999

New Member
Jun 26, 2004
112
0
0
Jul 3, 2004
#6
  • Jul 3, 2004
  • #6
It will fit

I placed the Air Gap and stock 289 2bbl manifold with the carb spacer/pcv port thing on it and they seem to be about the same height.

Bull
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jul 3, 2004
#7
  • Jul 3, 2004
  • #7
Best part is at the track. Everyone looks at you like a retard when you pull up and your intake is smoking. There is lots of room for dry ice to fit.
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Jul 3, 2004
#8
  • Jul 3, 2004
  • #8
INDEED lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
852
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
B
New Engine Oil Problem
  • BubbaG
  • Aug 7, 2022
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
1K
Other Auto Tech Aug 7, 2022
BubbaG
B
Progress Thread Akumu No Dara Ra's LSX swap and build Thread! Updated (2/10/22 @ 8:30PM CST)
  • Akumu No Dara Ra
  • Feb 4, 2022
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
140
Views
16K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2022
Akumu No Dara Ra
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?