• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Anyone Tried this product.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyiberwulf
  • Start date Start date Aug 18, 2004

Cyiberwulf

New Member
Jun 18, 2004
37
0
0
Pt. Neches, TX
Aug 18, 2004
#1
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #1


I put some in my stang to try to drop the temp whilest running the a/c in this extreme Texas heat. Supposed to make the radiator water 'wetter' thus allowing more heat transfer. Anyone else tried this product? Any testimonials??

 

squall9393

New Member
Feb 7, 2004
534
0
0
Oceanside, CA
Aug 18, 2004
#2
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #2
I dropped some in mine along with a product from DEI that was also a coolant additive but haven't noticed anything that would be considered significant.
 

Down

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
309
0
0
Overland Park, KS
Aug 18, 2004
#3
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #3
I used it in my blown 89. All in all, I probably saw an avg. decrease of 5 degrees or so. For me, it was well worth it.
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Aug 18, 2004
#4
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #4
Don't expect anything from it. If it does help, it's probably not going to be enough.

Start by changing your thermostat & coolant. That by itself is a good start, and cheap.

But if the fluid comes out rusty brown, you need to flush the system (I think autozone sells something for this, or if you are cheap, just refill the system with 100% water, then run the car until hot, then drain the water. Repeat until water is clear.). The rust may be inhibiting the flow of water to the cylinder heads, and causing excessive heat.

I recommend some sort of flush in the above case. It will expidite the process.
Scott
 

chrismillion

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 4, 2004
259
0
16
Aug 18, 2004
#5
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #5
its the same soap they give kids to blow bubbles. i didn't see any difference, but then too, i had just installed a new radiator and i have a 160* thermostat. some people say that the thermostat will not make my car run right
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Aug 18, 2004
#6
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #6
Just put some of that miracle stuff in my car. My car with the thermostat and fluidyne used to run ice cold, but now with the heads and cam on there it runs a little hotter. I put two bottle in mine and it dropped my temps about jack crap. Seems to be a waste.
 

95WhiteVenom

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
624
0
16
Alabama
Aug 18, 2004
#7
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #7
got a bottle sitting in my room use it as decoration next to my other car stuff cause I got it sent free with an order from mustangs unlimited I believe.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Aug 18, 2004
#8
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #8
chrismillion said:
some people say that the thermostat will not make my car run right
Click to expand...
The problem with a 160* stat is that it’s to low. The stat will pretty much stay open thus not giving the water in the radiator time to cool down more. That’s why it's not recommended to use a 160*.
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
Aug 19, 2004
#9
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #9
I threw it in when I changed my radiatior cuz I found a bottle of it in my garage (I put in a fluidyne with it tho so I coundent tell yo if the water wetter helped any). Basically what it does is increace the surface tension of the water, which in turn improves heat transfer and also raises the boiling point of the water. This can help if your radiator cap is bad or if your radiator needs help with heat transfer. The stuff isnt too expensive so I would give it a shot. Some people I know have had good luck with it and others havent. I think it all depends on the efficiency of you cooling system, what kinda shape everything is in, and also the materials that everything is made of. Its based on a valid principle so I wont say its BS, but it seems to work selectively for some but not others.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Aug 19, 2004
#10
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #10
wytstang said:
The problem with a 160* stat is that it’s to low. The stat will pretty much stay open thus not giving the water in the radiator time to cool down more. That’s why it's not recommended to use a 160*.
Click to expand...

That is a myth. Once the thermostat opens it remains fully open. The orifice on a 160 and 180 are the same. Once they are open, they flow the same quantity of water.

The best thing I ever did to lower engine temps was to buy a Mr. Gasket high flow thermostat. Big difference, and is $8.88 at Advance or Summit.

Kurt
 

squall9393

New Member
Feb 7, 2004
534
0
0
Oceanside, CA
Aug 19, 2004
#11
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #11
revhead347 said:
That is a myth. Once the thermostat opens it remains fully open. The orifice on a 160 and 180 are the same. Once they are open, they flow the same quantity of water.

The best thing I ever did to lower engine temps was to buy a Mr. Gasket high flow thermostat. Big difference, and is $8.88 at Advance or Summit.

Kurt
Click to expand...
I always heard that the engine runs more efficiently when the ECU senses the engine is up to it's warmed up operating temp which is between 180-210* If the system is cooling the engine to get it down to 160* then it would almost be as bad as leaving the thermostat out- fuel economy, emissions, and overall performance will suffer because of being in open loop the whole time
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Aug 19, 2004
#12
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #12
I had good results with two bottles. My engine stays cooler in all temps up to 100* weather.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
525
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Mustang5L5
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
873
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
863
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
785
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?