• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

anyone using bbk lowering springs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cb18201
  • Start date Start date Jun 24, 2004

cb18201

New Member
Oct 25, 2003
1,140
0
0
CT
Jun 24, 2004
#1
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #1
i wanna get this package from brothers performance that comes with kyb shocks and struts, bbk lowering springs (progressive or specific....which ones should i get?) and all the poly bushings i need to complete the job of lowering my car. this is the kit http://www.brothersperformance.com/shop/mustang/kt028.html

i just wanna see some pics of cars with them first, i have heard i should get the progressive rate springs also. what is the difference? so anyone who has these can you please post a pic, thanks
 

cb18201

New Member
Oct 25, 2003
1,140
0
0
CT
Jun 24, 2004
#2
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #2
anyone? they just come in a package, i was gonna get the eibach prokit springs but if these are about the same i would be saving myself alot of money by buying this package deal.
 

Car Nut

Founding Member
Jul 6, 2000
1,176
1
37
Snellville, Georgia (Atlanta area)
Jun 24, 2004
#3
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #3
I can't answer all your questions, but here's a couple I can due to my recent research on this same topic:

1. A set of springs/shocks/struts in a package are usually a good bet, as the spring rates should match the rest of the package.

2. Progressive rate is more pleasing than specific rate, if you looking for daily driver comfort. However, this can be debated IF your total package doesn't work well together.

3. Eibach ProKits are proven to be good and do not sag over time. Also, they have slightly higher spring rates than stock, so the ride should be nice with new shocks/struts.

Note: my info on this resulted from tons of researching which eventually led me to what I already knew was a great combination: Maximum Motorsports Road & Track Kit. I'm getting most of the kit next week (H&R race springs, Bilsteins, new bushings, etc.) and will get the rest by end of summer. I haven't seen a lot of info specifically about BBK springs, but I do know that the biggest difference will come from quality struts/shocks.

Good luck.
 

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
Daytona bch, Florida
Jun 24, 2004
#4
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #4
I ran the BBK springs in my car for years, and dont have any complaints. They ride just the same as my fathers 02 Saleen, with the Saleen springs, and any other Mustang ive been in. I am not 100% sure which spring i recieved, because my car dropped roughly 2" with the addition of the BBK specific rate springs, on stock shocks.

I would recomend replacement struts/shocks if yours are the original ones.
 

cb18201

New Member
Oct 25, 2003
1,140
0
0
CT
Jun 24, 2004
#5
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #5
should i get progressive or specific rate? its an everyday driver, but what is the difference really?
 

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
Daytona bch, Florida
Jun 24, 2004
#6
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #6
i cant really suggest anything, because ive only ran he BBK specific rate springs.
They worked just fine for me, and there are bumpy roads around here.
Never once had a problem with bottoming out, and i had longtubes.

Specific rate springs are basically a solid spring rate through the suspensions travel.
The car hits a bump, and as the spring compresses, the rate stays the same.. therefore its pobably a smoother hit, when u do hit a bump, or pothole.

A progressive rate spring, as it compresses, gets firmer the more it compresses.
So when you hit a pothole, a large one, you might feel more of a hit then you would with specific rate springs. I suppose the real benifit would be, they dont bottom out as easy as a specific rate spring might. But then agian, in my heavy convertible. i didnt have problems with te chassis bottoming out.
 

cb18201

New Member
Oct 25, 2003
1,140
0
0
CT
Jun 24, 2004
#7
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #7
the main thing i was worried about was it not dropping my car as much as the eibach pro kit would, i just want to reduce the fender gap and upgrade the suspension a little but nothing to crazy.
 

cb18201

New Member
Oct 25, 2003
1,140
0
0
CT
Jun 25, 2004
#8
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #8
so i should go with the bbk progressive rate you think?
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 25, 2004
#9
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #9
For a daily driver go with the progressive rated springs. In addition, get the whole package, ie, springs, shocks, struts like you mentioned. I haven't seen pictures of Mustangs with the BBK springs but 'Oink' said 2" on a vert. So, I would guess a Coupe would be a little less drop because of the weight difference.
 

cb18201

New Member
Oct 25, 2003
1,140
0
0
CT
Jun 25, 2004
#10
  • Jun 25, 2004
  • #10
ok thanks for the help guys, im gonna get that kit from brothers performance
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jul 9, 2004
#11
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #11
heh id like to see some pics with bbk springs im considering the specific rate for daily driving.....
 
H

HazMat404

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
1,749
0
36
Jul 9, 2004
#12
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #12
well i have bbk specific rate springs with 02 gt stock shocks/struts. it rides a lil rough but i think it looks great. im used to the ride but everyone else that rides in it is like "ur car breaking?" so i think if i you upgrade your shocks/struts too then you should be pretty decent off. mine dropped about 1.5"-1.75" from stock




 
S

stang2841

New Member
Jun 12, 2004
708
0
0
palm harbor florida
Jul 9, 2004
#13
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #13
damn thats a good looking car man , i want to get my car lowered about that much but not as much in the back. do u notice a big improvement in handling?
 
H

HazMat404

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
1,749
0
36
Jul 9, 2004
#14
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #14
nah, i still take turns like an idiot before and after and slide out all the time . in the back i have my spare/jack, about a 30lb sub w/ amp and about 30-40lbs of tools too. i didnt think about taking any of it out but the tools arent always in there but it will hopefully look better once i take out the spare/jack and and put the wheel spacers on tomorrow
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jul 9, 2004
#15
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #15
looks like ur back is lower then the front.....maybe cuz its convert and reasons u stated above?
 
H

HazMat404

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
1,749
0
36
Jul 9, 2004
#16
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #16
when i do my wheel spacers tomorrow, ill take out as much weight as possible in the back and take another pic. it does kinda look like it but not by too too much
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
344
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
158
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
261
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?