• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Anyone with a 347 using the stock radiator???

  • Thread starter Thread starter Davin
  • Start date Start date Aug 5, 2005

Davin

Founding Member
Mar 9, 2000
1,353
0
0
Jacksonville, FL
Aug 5, 2005
#1
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #1
My build starts in a week or two and I'm wondering if I'd have overheating problems with a (new) stock radiator. Fluidyne is sweet but expensive. Anyone doing this or know someone doing it? This will be a street driven 347 with about 9.4:1 compression and a mild cam....
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 5, 2005
#2
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #2
I know you don't wanna hear this but..........

Besides pushing you harder back in the seat, another by-product of more power is HEAT.

Most peeps who take their combo beyond a few mods and start to make some serious power have had to beef up their cooling system, that is just how it goes and thats just one more example of...........

If you wanna play....................

You gotta pay!

Later
Grady
 

SQUEEZE&STROKE

New Member
Jun 24, 2005
0
0
0
SOUTHERN CA
Aug 5, 2005
#3
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #3
331 with a/c removed and manual fan switch, NEVER had any cooling problems...it was a new replacement about a year ago
 

cobra259

Member
Jul 26, 2004
152
0
16
Waterford Mi
Aug 5, 2005
#4
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #4
When I did my Procharger, I got a fluidyne to go with it. The way I look at it, cheap ins against overheating. I paid $345 for mine. Just my 2 cents
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 5, 2005
#5
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #5
Wow, I changed my stock rad to a Steeda years ago when I put the heads, cam, etc. in there. I couldn't imagine running a 347 with the stock rad. Heat robs power like mentioned. I know it's expensive but it's money well spent especially here in Florida. The Steeda rad knocked off 20-30 degrees easy.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 5, 2005
#6
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #6
I guess I should have said that I am running a Fluidyne and Stewart high flow water pump.

No probs ... stays nice & cool, even in Texas summers.

Later
Grady
 

Davin

Founding Member
Mar 9, 2000
1,353
0
0
Jacksonville, FL
Aug 5, 2005
#7
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #7
Yeah, I figured, but I'm finding "a little insurance" her and a little there is really adding up...I've been ogling that Fluidyne and that new Canton Aluminim overflow tank..
 
J

Jack's95gt

Member
Aug 15, 2004
443
1
18
Huntingdon Valley, PA
Aug 7, 2005
#8
  • Aug 7, 2005
  • #8
I have a 342 and have had no problems. I'm running a 180 degree thermostat.
 

stangbanger94

New Member
Apr 29, 2004
203
0
0
Bergen County, NJ
Aug 7, 2005
#9
  • Aug 7, 2005
  • #9
347 here now, and a BeCool radiator
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Aug 7, 2005
#10
  • Aug 7, 2005
  • #10
Besides the inefficiency of our radiators, our cars are all over 10 yo now and 347 or not, it's time to put one in.

My (personal) Advice: Go ahead with the 347......be ready to to spend the money for the Fluidyne, but go ahead and try the stocker with a good flush first. It doesnt hurt to try the stock one as long as youre prepared to to spend the money if need be.

RC
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 7, 2005
#11
  • Aug 7, 2005
  • #11
I have a 3 core radiator from pep boys (unfortunatly, they don't make it for 94/95's) I just did a 347 a few weeks ago and I noticed it runs appx 15* hotter than my 302 did. I'm guessing its the extra compression causing it. It doesn't run too hot or overheat though. My compression is 11:1. On average my car will run around 195* in the day time and 185-190* at night.

I would have that radiator flushed/boiled if you wanna try it.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Aug 7, 2005
#12
  • Aug 7, 2005
  • #12
right now on my 331 i have the stock rad. i havent had the extra funds to upgrade to any type of performance rad (having a baby, buying a house), but i will this winter/next spring.
like Mike said, that Pep Boys one is a nice/cheap one, but the Fluidyne is probably the best your gonna get!
 

5.0_GT_kid

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 18, 2004
1,155
1
39
Largo, Florida
Aug 7, 2005
#13
  • Aug 7, 2005
  • #13
You could also try the Summit radiator, those work pretty well from what I hear.
 

Davin

Founding Member
Mar 9, 2000
1,353
0
0
Jacksonville, FL
Aug 8, 2005
#14
  • Aug 8, 2005
  • #14
Interesting responses, I wouln't think of using my current rad, I can get a stock replacement for under $100. I though maybe it might be worth a try...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
396
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Progress Thread BluePrint 347 long block engine swap
  • Sparky714
  • Aug 2, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 7 8 9
Replies
163
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 8, 2026
Sparky714
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?