• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Anyone Yet With RPM II Intake?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94GTLaserRC
  • Start date Start date Jun 22, 2005

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jun 22, 2005
#1
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #1
If so, post your entire engine combo and let us know your experience with it so far....Just curious. I know Mootang has one and I saw his combo in his sig.


I may go with this intake on a 347 combo with 185's and custom cam. Not sure yet, just gathering some info for now.

Thanks
RC
 

gmkillr

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
606
1
18
Jun 22, 2005
#2
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #2
From what ive been researching this is suppose to be a great blower intake.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 22, 2005
#3
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #3
Ninjacoupe on here runs that manifold with afr 185's and an FTI cam on his 347. He made 390rwhp. It isn't a high end cam, it was made for good torque and that power is under 6000rpm.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jun 22, 2005
#4
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #4
Grn92LX said:
Ninjacoupe on here runs that manifold with afr 185's and an FTI cam on his 347. He made 390rwhp. It isn't a high end cam, it was made for good torque and that power is under 6000rpm.
Click to expand...
Do you know what headers he runs?

WIth My AODE, I may end up having to keep the unequal shorties, tho I know the 1-3/4 longtubes would be better with that combo.

Im still really unsure what type of cam I would use with my setup...I want some good street use, so obviously, low-end tq is more important to me than high HP..

RC
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 22, 2005
#5
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #5
He runs kooks 1 3/4" LT's. 1 5/8" shortys will hurt you. You'll probably end up needing a cam with biased exhaust events to make up for the lack of exhaust flow. Go custom cam and specify exactly what you want. The 2nd time around with a custom FTI cam I was REAL specific with what I wanted (aggressive cam) and i have the p to v clearence to do it.

If moneys an object, just keep your chineese rpm
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jun 22, 2005
#6
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #6
Grn92LX said:
He runs kooks 1 3/4" LT's. 1 5/8" shortys will hurt you. You'll probably end up needing a cam with biased exhaust events to make up for the lack of exhaust flow. Go custom cam and specify exactly what you want. The 2nd time around with a custom FTI cam I was REAL specific with what I wanted (aggressive cam) and i have the p to v clearence to do it.

If moneys an object, just keep your chineese rpm
Click to expand...
Money will matter somewhat, but Since my Typhoon is polished, it should get me close to 1/2 of what the RPM 2 costs.

Thanks again for the help Mike
RC
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jun 22, 2005
#7
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #7
I have heard that there needs to be a good bit of "massaging" to get the ports of the new rpm II and the AFR 185 heads to match up... lets just say I "may" have looked into this.
 
O

onebad331

New Member
Jun 23, 2005
1
0
0
Jun 23, 2005
#8
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #8
Killercanary said:
I have heard that there needs to be a good bit of "massaging" to get the ports of the new rpm II and the AFR 185 heads to match up... lets just say I "may" have looked into this.
Click to expand...



you may have looked into it but i have had 185's and the rpm 2 and

they match ALMOST PERFECT i was amazed

but i wouldnt recommend 1 3/4 long tubes because they dont match the 185 at all they are HUGE compared to them go 1 5/8
 

mootang

New Member
Dec 5, 2004
907
0
0
texas
Jun 23, 2005
#9
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #9
the guy where i went for my dyno session put his car on while i was there and it was a home built 331 with AFR 185's, edelbrock rpm II and F 303 cam. had short tube headers. It made 370HP and similar torque.

I saw him at the track this last weekend with the same car and had a hundred shot of nitrous, gears, and slicks and was running 11.2's
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jun 23, 2005
#10
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #10
Killercanary said:
I have heard that there needs to be a good bit of "massaging" to get the ports of the new rpm II and the AFR 185 heads to match up... lets just say I "may" have looked into this.
Click to expand...

Paul I always heard that too but I just put one on a 331 (8.2 deck 302, 0 deck, stock AFR 58cc 185's, .039" thick gasket) with AFR185's and it matched really nice, I was expected the total opposite. Repling to your e-mail right now...
 

91LX_5L

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
1,943
0
36
British Columbia
Jun 23, 2005
#11
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #11
94GTLaserRC said:
I may go with this intake on a 347 combo with 185's and custom cam. Not sure yet, just gathering some info for now.

Thanks
RC
Click to expand...


dream setup +TURBO
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 23, 2005
#12
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #12
Nice intake for that application.
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Jun 23, 2005
#13
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #13
Taggng along
 
A

Allmotor95

New Member
Oct 28, 2004
29
0
0
Jun 24, 2005
#14
  • Jun 24, 2005
  • #14
I own one and personally think it's too small for a 347!!

Trickflow R, Victor Jr. or even Systemax would be my choice, specially if sc.

But that's just my opinion!!!!
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 24, 2005
#15
  • Jun 24, 2005
  • #15
Depends on the rpm range you use it in. I think it's fine for apps less than 6,000 rpm or so. For anything above that, then look to a shorter/bigger section. What rpm do buzz yours Allmotor95?
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Jun 24, 2005
#16
  • Jun 24, 2005
  • #16
I dont think I personally will be worrying about > 6000 rpm range.

RC
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
723
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
892
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Forced Induction Normal intake temps for supercharger??
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Jun 16, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
977
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 16, 2024
Kid wita 5oh
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?