• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

AOD faster that 5speed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrankenStang
  • Start date Start date Nov 20, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Nov 20, 2007
#1
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #1
There's an arguement going on elsewhere about this. In my personal experience, 5speeds have always been quicker. My '80 Capri, bone stock motor, 3'73s, with a 5 speed raped my Ex's '91 GT bone stock motor, stock gears with an AOD. And my Ex's '90 bone stock motor, stock gears, with a 5 speed (god rest her soul) smoked his brother's '90 vert bone stock motor, stock gears, with an AOD.

Wait, the 5 speeds I mentioned above probably are quicker because of weight and gears. Right?

So, I guess my question is: Is a bone stock AOD LX hatch quicker than a bone stock 5 speed LX hatch?

I'm thinking no but, I just thought I'd ask you guys...
 

ttop88

Member
Mar 12, 2007
42
0
6
indiana
Nov 20, 2007
#2
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #2
t5 every time bone stock. The capri has a weight advantage over everything listed by the way. Gears and a 5 speed that didn't exist in 1980 didn't hurt any lol
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Nov 20, 2007
#3
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #3
~FrankenStang~ said:
There's an arguement going on elsewhere about this. In my personal experience, 5speeds have always been quicker. My '80 Capri, bone stock motor, 3'73s, with a 5 speed raped my Ex's '91 GT bone stock motor, stock gears with an AOD. And my Ex's '90 bone stock motor, stock gears, with a 5 speed (god rest her soul) smoked his brother's '90 vert bone stock motor, stock gears, with an AOD.

Wait, the 5 speeds I mentioned above probably are quicker because of weight and gears. Right?

So, I guess my question is: Is a bone stock AOD LX hatch quicker than a bone stock 5 speed LX hatch?
Click to expand...

No a stock 5spd will spank a stock AOD.

No, it's faster because of the launch and faster shifts of a 5spd.

BUT!!

I will take a worked AOD ANYDAY over a 5spd! And by worked I just mean a high speed stall converter and a shift kit. That's the cheap way to work it. You can pay 2500+ for a Lentech or other race AOD's out there, but the cheap way is pretty effective.
 
U

UnderdogGN

New Member
May 7, 2006
74
0
0
Nov 20, 2007
#4
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #4
Stock for stock the 5sp will rape an AOD. A stock AOD has shift points at like 4800. On the other hand i think my AOD with a 3200 converter, shift kit, and rear gears has and will beat some 5sp cars.
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Nov 20, 2007
#5
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #5
That's what I thought. Thanks.
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Nov 20, 2007
#6
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #6
ttop88 said:
t5 every time bone stock. The capri has a weight advantage over everything listed by the way. Gears and a 5 speed that didn't exist in 1980 didn't hurt any lol
Click to expand...

Yeah, that must be why my Capri has never been beaten by another stock motored fox. (I am not condoning street racing) The Notch might give it a run for it's money though.

Might have to take them both to the track someday. Just to see...
 

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
Canton, MI
Nov 20, 2007
#7
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #7
My built 4R/manual shift transmission will snap your head off >=)

Stock vs. stock, aod loses no doubt.
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Nov 20, 2007
#8
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #8
This is assuming both cars have the same gears,but the 5spd car came with 2.73 and IIRC the AOD cars came with 3.08 gears,with a 3.27 optional?
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Nov 20, 2007
#9
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #9
mansonozz said:
My built 4R/manual shift transmission will snap your head off >=)

Stock vs. stock, aod loses no doubt.
Click to expand...

 
P

PJB

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
131
0
0
Rotterdam, NY
Nov 20, 2007
#10
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #10
Ive seen T5 cars run about 1/2 a second faster than AOD cars.
My AOD car feels like a dog.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Nov 20, 2007
#11
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #11
Ahh jeez

See what you started lyn? This will be 3 pages by the morning!
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Nov 20, 2007
#12
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #12
Cool beans.
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,277
368
164
Joplin, Missouri
Nov 20, 2007
#13
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #13
I have had both. Currently have a bone stock aod and its a turd. The car is overall in better shape than my old 5 speed but is slow b/c the stock stall and gears.

Plus I believe most aods had 273's with a 3.08 option correct???
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Nov 20, 2007
#14
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #14
stock aod < 5spd with crappy driver < built aod < 5spd with a really good driver
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Nov 20, 2007
#15
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #15
blackened88lx said:
stock aod < 5spd with crappy driver < built aod < 5spd with a really good driver
Click to expand...

<built C4<racing PowerGlide<4/5 spd Lenco with 3disc clutch
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Nov 20, 2007
#16
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #16
I'd rather opt for a built AOD, myself ... mostly because I suck at driving a stick in any way besides granny-shifting. Although I'd still like to pick up another T-5 Fox sometime for a DD, and just for variety.

There is a weight difference between a T-5 and an AOD, but it's not so much that as the aforementioned items of launch RPM's and shift points. Also, there's a difference in powertrain loss percentage between a T-5 and an AOD between the flywheel and the rear wheels, as an AOD will usually absorb a bit more horsepower.

T-5 PRO'S: Lighter; less powertrain loss %; human-controlled shift points; easier to rebuild/service, higher-RPM launches.

AOD PRO'S: Consistency, easier to DD, and ... uhhh ... some other advantages I can't think of right at the moment.
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Nov 20, 2007
#17
  • Nov 20, 2007
  • #17
I used to be real good/fast at shifting. Haven't had a reason to shift extremely quick lately so, I don't know if I've lost my touch or not.
 

cervinistang

New Member
May 7, 2007
11
0
0
Dearborn, Michigan
Nov 21, 2007
#18
  • Nov 21, 2007
  • #18
i actually have heard this alot. A bunch of different people told me to buy AOD, sounded stuppid but alot of people believe this. they say with a shift kit i could beat your hands.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Nov 21, 2007
#19
  • Nov 21, 2007
  • #19
I had an AOD, and a 5-speed in the same car. With the AOD and a 2400 stall it went 14.2 @ 97. With the 5-speed and not a single other change with a week of driving it under my belt went 13.9 @ 99.

A built AOD will be a great tranny. A built auto will shift faster than a person can. The real advantage if your a good driver is the gear ratios. The 2.40 first in the AOD sucks whereas the 3.35 in the T5 gets you out of the hole much much better.

I couldn't see my car going much faster with an AOD unless it was built up real real well, and even then I doubt it would be all that much faster, and would get worse gas mileage!
 

ttop88

Member
Mar 12, 2007
42
0
6
indiana
Nov 21, 2007
#20
  • Nov 21, 2007
  • #20
If you want to kick the crap out of a 5 speed car build a aod with a wide band kit. The differance is huge. Makes you 3.27 gear a 3.89 in every gear but od.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread 93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2025
Scrapla347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
WTB/Trade Looking for a T-Top Hatch. Possible convertible trade? (Rhode Island)
  • 7upper
  • Mar 18, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
326
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Mar 18, 2025
7upper
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
305
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
M
Window issues
  • Meierznutz
  • Jun 25, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
753
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 28, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?