• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Are '74 351w heads "rail rocker" heads?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 351 82GT
  • Start date Start date Nov 12, 2006
3

351 82GT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
430
0
0
Nov 12, 2006
#1
  • Nov 12, 2006
  • #1
What kind of heads are the '74 351w heads? Are they the rail type or pedestal mount?
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 12, 2006
#2
  • Nov 12, 2006
  • #2
Definitely not rail type rockers from the factory. They will be either stud mount or pedistal mount individual rockers.
 
3

351 82GT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
430
0
0
Nov 12, 2006
#3
  • Nov 12, 2006
  • #3
How can you tell the difference?
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Nov 12, 2006
#4
  • Nov 12, 2006
  • #4
One of the earlier Ford rocker setups had postive stop studs. The stud was pressed into the head, a specific distance, and the rocker nut is tightened until it tightens on the shoulder on the stud. These were used with cast rail type rockers for rocker guidance. The pressd in stud is not recommended for high performance use, as with stronger valvesprings there is a chance of the stud being pulled out of the head. Comp does make a kit, consisting of spacers under the nut, and special locking nuts, to make this an adjustable setup.

After that Ford switched to the bolt down pedestal type.

The rail type has cast rockers with the litte ears that drop down on each side of the tip of the valve stem, called rails. The pos stop type has these.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Nov 12, 2006
#5
  • Nov 12, 2006
  • #5
Sorry, duplicate.
 

Dark Knight

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2000
2,578
0
0
Chandler, Az.
Nov 13, 2006
#6
  • Nov 13, 2006
  • #6
They have the rail type rocker. Ford didnt change to the pedestal till 1977. FWIW, comp cams makes a roller tip rail rocker arm. If you plan on using those heads, get the screw in studs. If you have them gone through, they take a valve with a longer stem. If you get ones that are to short, the rails will push down on the spring retainer... not good.
What are the plans? If you put them on a later 5.0, you're probably going to lose power.. pretty sure they have a bigger chamber size than the 302, you'll lose alot of compression...
 
3

351 82GT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
430
0
0
Nov 13, 2006
#7
  • Nov 13, 2006
  • #7
I was just trying to prove a point to a buddy of mine who tried to tell me they were not rail rockers on that year.
BTW, they would make a little more power on a late model 302 because they have 60cc chambers
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 13, 2006
#8
  • Nov 13, 2006
  • #8
Check the crane cams website, www.cranecams.com. They only show pedistal and stud mount rockers as stock replacements. Any shaft mount rocker setups for the Windsor engines were an aftermarket add on.

The 352-360-390-427 FE series engine used shaft mount rockers. The Windsor 221-260-289-302-351 series engines were always stud or pedistal mount rockers from the factory.
 

jtfairlane

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
468
3
0
Nov 13, 2006
#9
  • Nov 13, 2006
  • #9
Jrichker,

I think you are mistaking shaft mount rockers and rail type rockers as being the same thing, they are not.

Rail type rocker arms, as have already been said, have little ears that help keep the rocker tip center on the tip of the valve stem. If you look at the following picture, you can see the little ears sticking down past the roller tip. http://static.summitracing.com/global/images/prod/large/cca-1450-16_w.jpg

I'm sure you know what shaft mounted rockers look like, so I won't waste your time by posting a picture of them. But, Ford started using the rail type rocker arm in 1966 and used them for quite some time until the introduction of bolt down pedestal type rockers much later.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 13, 2006
#10
  • Nov 13, 2006
  • #10
jtfairlane said:
Jrichker,

I think you are mistaking shaft mount rockers and rail type rockers as being the same thing, they are not.

Rail type rocker arms, as have already been said, have little ears that help keep the rocker tip center on the tip of the valve stem. If you look at the following picture, you can see the little ears sticking down past the roller tip. http://static.summitracing.com/global/images/prod/large/cca-1450-16_w.jpg

I'm sure you know what shaft mounted rockers look like, so I won't waste your time by posting a picture of them. But, Ford started using the rail type rocker arm in 1966 and used them for quite some time until the introduction of bolt down pedestal type rockers much later.
Click to expand...
I see what you mean now. I knew that the early Windsor engines used a ball type pivot for the rockers, like the SB chevy engines.I didn't give much thought as to how they kept them lined up over the valve stem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
428
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Resolved 83 frame rail damage?
  • x_man586
  • May 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
146
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 14, 2026
General karthief
351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
533
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
Paint and Body Frame rail dimensions
  • keel
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2026
keel
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?