• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

are bolt in sub frame connectors good

  • Thread starter Thread starter murphmaster5
  • Start date Start date Jan 12, 2006
M

murphmaster5

New Member
Oct 2, 2005
115
0
0
PA
Jan 12, 2006
#1
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #1
i want to get a set of sub frame connector but dont want the hassle of getting them welded so im thinking of just getting ford racing bolt ins do they work as well as the weld ins
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Jan 12, 2006
#2
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #2
They do not work as well as the weld-in connectors. Getting them welded is more than worth the time/money.
 

PuterAmI

Member
Mar 29, 2003
513
0
16
Madison, Alabama
Jan 12, 2006
#3
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #3
They bolt on just fine.

To get you to the shop to have them welded on.
 

5.0 Nostalgia

10 Year Member
Feb 28, 2003
904
5
39
CT
Jan 12, 2006
#4
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #4
No they are not. The chassis will still flex with them. Welds are much stronger. The new edge convertibles and special addition Mustangs came with bolt-in subframe connectors, but they need to be welded to be more effective.
 

TrophyHead

15 Year Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,195
11
49
PA
Jan 12, 2006
#5
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #5
Weld them. There not a permanant mod. You can take them off easliy.
 

ALMOST STOCK

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2000
1,250
41
88
CA.
Jan 12, 2006
#6
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #6
I've been reading the same reply for 5 yrs now...WELDED is the only way.
Does anyone really have any hard core fact, or is it all hear say from what everyone has read before?

Just curious, because I'm looking for some facts so when I tell someone that the only way subs really do there job is to have them welded ,that way I can back up what I'm saying with facts.
 

5.0 Nostalgia

10 Year Member
Feb 28, 2003
904
5
39
CT
Jan 12, 2006
#7
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #7
ALMOST STOCK said:
I've been reading the same reply for 5 yrs now...WELDED is the only way.
Does anyone really have any hard core fact, or is it all hear say from what everyone has read before?

Just curious, because I'm looking for some facts so when I tell someone that the only way subs really do there job is to have them welded ,that way I can back up what I'm saying with facts.
Click to expand...

From my basic understanding, welds are stronger than bolts. When the chassis is flexing under load, the bolts will move (even if only slightly). Over time, this can begin to destroy the holes drilled for the bolts. It's just like how the control arm mounting areas will wear out over time if the car is abused and does not have torque box reinforcements. When the subframe connectors are welded in, you eliminate this weakness.
 

ALMOST STOCK

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2000
1,250
41
88
CA.
Jan 12, 2006
#8
  • Jan 12, 2006
  • #8
5.0 Nostalgia said:
From my basic understanding, welds are stronger than bolts. When the chassis is flexing under load, the bolts will move (even if only slightly). Over time, this can begin to destroy the holes drilled for the bolts. It's just like how the control arm mounting areas will wear out over time if the car is abused and does not have torque box reinforcements. When the subframe connectors are welded in, you eliminate this weakness.
Click to expand...

5.0 Nostalgia that is exactly my understanding and I AGREE ... I was hoping that someone had a graph or chart that actually showed the difference.
I've read what MM says about bolt on versus welding but again not what I'd call hard core evidence showing the difference and that is what I’m looking for.
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Jan 13, 2006
#9
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #9
Comp engineering

Comp Engineering makes my fav sub frame conectors.

you can weld in the bolt in ones, but the hot ticket is to put the weld in ones. The go through the floor and use the sear streagh of the floor to stiffen the car. They are a lot more work, but worth it
 
C

Camman

Founding Member
Jan 5, 2000
1,055
0
37
Las Vegas, NV
Jan 13, 2006
#10
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #10
ALMOST STOCK said:
5.0 Nostalgia that is exactly my understanding and I AGREE ... I was hoping that someone had a graph or chart that actually showed the difference.
I've read what MM says about bolt on versus welding but again not what I'd call hard core evidence showing the difference and that is what I’m looking for.
Click to expand...

You can prove it to yourself quite easily. Take some u bolts and lie them on a table just like your subframes would be in the stang. Now get some channel aluminum and set the ubolt ends into the channels on both ends, just like subframe connectors(kinda). Now clamp channels together with some welding clamps and torque the whole assembly. Retry without the clamps and in place weld them.

I just realised thats really not that easy lol

You could take 2 pieces of ange iron and bolt those things together stacked on top of each other, then put one end in a vice and pound on the other end with a hammer . Watch what will happen to the bolt hole, same thing is happening when you drive around with bolt in subframes.
 

88-GT

Member
Oct 8, 2004
183
2
18
Jan 13, 2006
#11
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #11
Yea we put a set of bolt in subs on my buddys camaro and it was a joke, not near the structural rigidity as weld in, didnt matter how tight the bolts were either. Happy to say after that that mine are welded in
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Electrical Getting good ground in 1991 Fox Vert for amps - getting popping noise when I turn on the lights?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
391
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 5, 2026
Noobz347
E
New Member with 91 foxbody
  • EricMac13
  • Jul 22, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
9
Views
408
The Welcome Wagon Jul 23, 2025
EricMac13
E
Torque box reinforcement with cage?
  • DeathProof88
  • Jan 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
DeathProof88
R
Engine Evap and charcoal cannister leak
  • ryan1994stang
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
413
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 18, 2026
Mcmahst
Exhaust Exhaust and Sub Frame connectors
  • limp
  • Feb 25, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 2, 2024
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?