• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Are these Sub-Frames good enough?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dominus_Servi
  • Start date Start date Apr 26, 2004

Dominus_Servi

New Member
Apr 28, 2003
240
0
0
San Diego, CA
Apr 26, 2004
#1
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #1
Ive been hesitant to install some CGS subframe connectors I purchased off ebay due to some negative responses Ive heard in the forums. They are approximately 4 1/2 ft. long so they are not full legnth. Anyone have any suggestions? Should I go proceed with the install or should I buy the Maximum Motorsports full length connectors?

BTW has anyone tried the CGS connecotors? If so, how are they?
 
8

85GTlover

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
704
0
0
Apr 26, 2004
#2
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #2
Do you know how long full length subframes are? Compared to yours? Will they go from under your lower UCL arm bolt/torque box area, all the way to the front subframe near the firewall? Measure your subframes and compare that to the distance to those areas on your car, if they reach, use them. Unless you want the type that support the back seat bolts(if they are not). My car does not have those(seat supports) and it is ok. You have some now, why spend extra money? Weld them in is a good idea if you can.
 

decoy562

New Member
Oct 9, 2003
1,526
0
0
Acworth, GA
Apr 26, 2004
#3
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #3
I would definitely go with full length subframe connectors if I were you.
 
R

Rocketman

New Member
Apr 20, 2004
730
0
0
SoCal
Apr 26, 2004
#4
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #4
A full length SFC is the only way to tie the front and rear sub-frames together and eliminate chassis flex. IMO the MM full lengths welded in is the only way to go.
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Apr 26, 2004
#5
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #5
I have/just recently installed MM full-length subframe. I'm happy with it. If you're going to do subframe, I don't see why you won't go full-length
 
8

85GTlover

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
704
0
0
Apr 26, 2004
#6
  • Apr 26, 2004
  • #6
But what is the difference in length from his, to full frames? If they do connect the front to the back, they are good enough. Thats what I mean, if they are shorter than for sure get full length ones. I hope I was not misunderstood here.
 

Dominus_Servi

New Member
Apr 28, 2003
240
0
0
San Diego, CA
Apr 30, 2004
#7
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #7
Ok, I guess I'll go with the MM Full lengths. Thanks for the input.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
197
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Mid lenght sub frame connectors (straight)
  • Dontknowchit
  • Apr 13, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 14, 2024
bird_dog0347
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Factory Vert reinforcement plates and sub frame connectors
  • limp
  • Aug 22, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 31, 2023
limp
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?