• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Automatic Trans starter in 3 speed Standard Trans

  • Thread starter Thread starter rsweld
  • Start date Start date Jun 12, 2010
R

rsweld

Member
Dec 30, 2009
64
0
6
St. Marys, GA.
Jun 12, 2010
#1
  • Jun 12, 2010
  • #1
Here is an odd one. Had to replace my starter in my 65 3 speed atandard shift trans. bought one from Auto Zone and it did fit into the hole, took it back and ordered a second one same thing no fit. Returned it and went to Advance Auto Parts, there part # was the same as Auto Zone then an Older fellow (sales Manager) took one look at my old starter and said that is a starter for an Automatic, He had an automatic Trans starter in stock so he pulled it and it was identical to my old starter. Took it home and lo and behold it Fit. Who would have thought a standard shift trans woul use an automatic trans starter. Good old Ford.

Ron
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jun 12, 2010
#2
  • Jun 12, 2010
  • #2
That's odd cause from what powermaster says the 3 and 4 speeds stick cars take a diff starter than the 5 and auto cars.
 

horseballz

10 Year Member
Sep 30, 2009
824
19
49
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 12, 2010
#3
  • Jun 12, 2010
  • #3
I. also am confused. I posted a question here and on another site about what starter to use for my upper 90s 5.0 with a 90-92 T5/T5 bell/157 tooth flywheel in my 68 Coupe that had a 289/3-speed manual. A member at the other site said I couldn't use my manual starter, but instead needed to use one for an automatic or from a 90-92.
An interesting twist?
So I took the starter from my 68/289/3-speed manual to the parts store to compare with one listed for an automatic, one for a 92 and one listed for a 68 manual. From what I can tell I had a starter for an automatic in my manual car? The plus side is that it appears I don't need to buy a starter, but I'm wondering how my car functioned properly with the wrong starter.
I share your wonder/confusion,
Gene
 

EP429

Member
Jun 30, 2007
125
5
18
Central Texas
Jun 12, 2010
#4
  • Jun 12, 2010
  • #4
I'm in the same boat, auto starter for me as well

I never tried to figure out why, just ran it and didn't question each successful crank
 

Az Pete

10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
711
18
49
Panama City, Fl.
Jun 13, 2010
#5
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #5
I have heard and seen that some parts stores have the numbers backwards for auto vs manual starters. Always take the one out of your car first to be on the safe side.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 13, 2010
#6
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #6
It's not a "manual vs. auto" choice. It's actually simpler than that. From a catalog I keep handy:

There are two choices:

64½-67 260, 289, 302, manual with 157T flywheel, all C4 auto-
matic, 68-73 289, 302, 351 with automatic Starter

Alternately:

68-73 289,302,351 manual trans with 164T flywheel Starter
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jun 13, 2010
#7
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #7
According to powermaster its

9503
Ford 289-302-351W A/T & 5-speed M/T (3/4" Offset)*

9504
Ford 289-302-351W 3 & 4-speed M/T (3/8" Offset)*

9505
Ford 351M, 400, 429, 460

9506
Ford 390-427-428 "FE" Only
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jun 13, 2010
#8
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #8
OK, they list it by dimensions rather than application. Originally, of course, all 64-67 260/289 had the same starter, regardless of engine. Nowadays, people have assembled these cars from parts so much you have to be careful.

Your chart leaves out the 200. Which uses the same starter as the 390/428. Go figure.
 

EP429

Member
Jun 30, 2007
125
5
18
Central Texas
Jun 13, 2010
#9
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #9
2+2GT said:
It's not a "manual vs. auto" choice. It's actually simpler than that. From a catalog I keep handy:

There are two choices:

64½-67 260, 289, 302, manual with 157T flywheel, all C4 auto-
matic, 68-73 289, 302, 351 with automatic Starter

Alternately:

68-73 289,302,351 manual trans with 164T flywheel Starter
Click to expand...

That may be why, I have a 157-tooth flywheel
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Jun 13, 2010
#10
  • Jun 13, 2010
  • #10
Not really, since the some of the newer mustangs use 164T flywheels and the same starter as the 65 auto with a 157T.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
432
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Starters suck. So does the aftermarket!
  • Blue Thunder
  • Apr 30, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
4K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 13, 2024
Blue Thunder
B
Questions About T5 Manual
  • Blackout67
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
570
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
475
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?