• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

avoiding the speed density

  • Thread starter Thread starter savvydevil
  • Start date Start date Nov 1, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

savvydevil

New Member
Nov 1, 2009
0
0
0
Nov 1, 2009
#1
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #1
i purchased my 1st car & beginning the mods on the motor, i am aware that the non cali 88 and below foxbodys are equipped with speed density. i want to do as much as i can performance wise without converting to mas airflow. i will do such when money allows. what can i do without programming or converting my ecu?
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Nov 1, 2009
#2
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #2
Mass air shouldn't be avoided it should be your first step. Why are you against it?
 

87GT Drop Top

Member
May 1, 2009
500
3
17
South Florida
Nov 1, 2009
#3
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #3
Do like I am drive it the way it is and buy everything and do it at once. I have an 87 SD car. I put a K&N filter not a CAI, because when I go MAF I will need a different one. I put headers and full exhaust. I bumped my timing to 14* and added 373 gears. The rest I did was cosmetic. If you do it like you say you will be doing some things twice. You can do the few things I did and still use them later after the MAF conversion.
I've already got my new ECU and harness, Cobra upper & lower, 255lph fuel pump. 70MM TB and DSS 331 rotating assembly. I still need heads, cam, injectors, MAF sensor, CAI and the rest of the little crap to make it right. When I have everything I will pull the motor and do it up.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,145
17,841
224
Massachusetts
Nov 1, 2009
#4
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #4
Everything but cam...and injectors obviously.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Nov 1, 2009
#5
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #5
there are guys pushing close to 300whp with cobra heads/intake and still keeping the stock SD set up.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Nov 1, 2009
#6
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #6
speed density is good. just gotta get a tune if you change the cam and/or injectors. mass air is just more adaptive and easier to work with. my car is an original speed density car too. i converted it when i rebuilt my motor a few years back. took me all of 1.5 hours.
 

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Nov 1, 2009
#7
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #7
SD is gonna be faster stock for stock. I wouldnt worry about swapping over unless you decide to go pretty far with it.
 

Cobra912

Active Member
May 1, 2005
1,777
11
39
Wish I was anywhere but here
Nov 1, 2009
#8
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #8
swapping over to mass air is extremly easy. I did everything I could to avoid switching it over thinking it would cost me an arm and a leg. It hardly costs that much once you buy a cpu, meter and meter plug harness. given the chance again I would do it first. Then you'll have no reason not to do something to your car.
 
S

savvydevil

New Member
Nov 1, 2009
0
0
0
Nov 1, 2009
#9
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #9
im not against it per say but i am just on a budget as of now. im the type of guy who puts performance 1st. i could care less how it looks. so im trying to get low 13's high 12's before i go for looks. full exhaust woulnt be out of the question would it?
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Nov 1, 2009
#10
  • Nov 1, 2009
  • #10
no not at all. as stated earlier, you can change pretty much everything but the cam and injectors and be fine with speed density. just can't get too gnarly with the heads and intake, but you definitely can swap them.
 
S

savvydevil

New Member
Nov 1, 2009
0
0
0
Nov 2, 2009
#11
  • Nov 2, 2009
  • #11
very well. thanks for the help.
 

Shaun1212

New Member
Oct 20, 2009
22
0
0
toronto, canada
Nov 3, 2009
#12
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #12
1987 speed density

I ran my 87 for years without mass air. Alot of us did back in the late 80's. I had the usuall motor work done. The idle would just hunt, go up and down and foul plugs easier thats all. Instead of switching to mass air, I went carb.

i had a b303 with no problems. Saying you cant change cams unless you have mass air is not true...
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Nov 3, 2009
#13
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #13
That's not saying much seeing as a bcam is nearly the same as the stock HO cam with more duration....
 

Shaun1212

New Member
Oct 20, 2009
22
0
0
toronto, canada
Nov 3, 2009
#14
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #14
Not saying much?

That's not saying much seeing as a bcam is nearly the same as the stock HO cam with more duration....

Sounds like your cuttin me down... I was just saying you can change cams with speed density because someone else in the thread said no way.

We also had cars with custom grind crower cams with duration well above 250 @ o.50 no problem
So smart guy, tell me the specs on the stock cam and the B303....
While your at it, the X and the Z as well. Hurry up and look it up on the net, times a wastin'.....
 

Shaun1212

New Member
Oct 20, 2009
22
0
0
toronto, canada
Nov 3, 2009
#15
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #15
This is whats done to your car and your an expert?

5-spd
Mac Shorty Headers
Electric Fan
Flowmaster exhaust with o/r Hpipe
smog delete
Zex Wet Nitrous Kit 125 Shot

I'd show you the taillights on my Harley...
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,145
17,841
224
Massachusetts
Nov 3, 2009
#16
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #16
Shaun1212 said:
So smart guy, tell me the specs on the stock cam and the B303....
While your at it, the X and the Z as well. Hurry up and look it up on the net, times a wastin'.....
Click to expand...

I'd show you the taillights on my Harley...
Click to expand...


His post is nowhere near as condescending as yours. Is there really a reason to insult him in 2 posts because you disagree about the specs of a B cam?

Much more mature ways to handle that than posting up his mod list and insulting him. Try and be more personable please. Thank you
 

Shaun1212

New Member
Oct 20, 2009
22
0
0
toronto, canada
Nov 3, 2009
#17
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #17
Nicely said I must say and you are right. I guess I took it a little to personally, I apologize....
 

Shaun1212

New Member
Oct 20, 2009
22
0
0
toronto, canada
Nov 3, 2009
#18
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #18
By the way.....

I like your Avitar Pic.......Kidding
 

Shaun1212

New Member
Oct 20, 2009
22
0
0
toronto, canada
Nov 3, 2009
#19
  • Nov 3, 2009
  • #19
To tannerc91gt

I think I was a little harsh on you, sorry about that. It was uncalled for and I hope you will accept my appology. This is a great forum and I should have used more sense than attacking someone personally. Sorry Man....
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Nov 4, 2009
#20
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #20
stykthyn said:
there are guys pushing close to 300whp with cobra heads/intake and still keeping the stock SD set up.
Click to expand...

I'd like to see that.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
ECU help!
  • starkiller1134
  • Aug 16, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
250
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
starkiller1134
S
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
817
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
S
2002 Mustang V6 5-speed with a bad ECU
  • stevetheheathen
  • Nov 11, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
224
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 13, 2024
Noobz347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
557
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?