• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Bell Housing & Clutch for 351W and Top Loader

  • Thread starter Thread starter howardjnl
  • Start date Start date Jun 20, 2005
H

howardjnl

New Member
Jun 15, 2005
2
0
0
Jun 20, 2005
#1
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #1
Folks,
I'm new to this forum, been an occasional visitor for several months now. I'm helping my son with his '68 Fastback. He has a 351 Windsor and toploader 4-speed that he intends to put into his car which currently has a 289 and auto. I'm not that familiar with Ford, I'm need help with determining what bell housing and clutch I should use with the new setup. Suggestions?
John
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Jun 20, 2005
#2
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #2
As far as bellhousings go, I believe if you get one with a "T" as the third digit in the part number, it'll be too deep as it's a truck part. I'm not sure if there were any 4-speeds offered for SBFs in trucks, so I may be off base. Of course if I'm wrong, that it's actually no problem as you couldn't mess it up, now could you?

Now another thing to look out for as far as the toploader itself goes is, tailshaft length and input shaft length and input & output shaft size. Galaxies and other big cars and trucks have the longer tailshaft, so you may need a shortened driveshaft. Most of these longer housings have multiple bosses to move the shifter forward however. www.4speedtoploaders.com is David Kee's website and has breakdowns on part numbers and such.

The FE powered trucks that had toploaders had the deeper bellhousing that required a longer input shaft. If you have one of these and they did make a deeper SBF bellhousing, this might be the easiest solution, although the better one would be to have the tip of the pilot shaft shortened (this is what's longer). If you decide to go to a steel scattershield (I recommend), you typically have to clearance for long tube headers and sometimes the clutch linkage. Usually these go for around $100 on Ebay and if they're modified, the SFI rating on them is no longer any good (and it's only good for a couple of years anyway).

There are big input/output shafts and small input/output shafts. The big I/O trannies came in BBF powered vehicles and the small I/O typically came in small block vehicles although the 390 toploaders are small I/O trannies. Typically the big I/O trannys have a 2.32 first gear ratio called a "closed ratio" tranny. The small I/O trannys typically have a 2.78 first gear ratio and are called an "open ratio" tranny.

As far as clutches go, I prefer the long style clutch and the stock z-bar setup. Some guys like the diaphram clutch and the cable setup. It's more preference than anything I guess.

David Hearne aka D.Hearne probably knows as much about Toploaders as anyone on this board, hopefully he'll chime in and put in his two bits.

GP001 is probably the most experienced when it comes to putting in a hydraulic clutch if you want to go that route. He has a pretty slick setup on his 6-speed tranny. He also used a scattershield.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Jun 20, 2005
#3
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • #3
You can use a bellhousing from a 289, 302, or 351w. The best one would be from a 302 or a 351w that is made for an 11" clutch. Of course you should also acquire a flywheel for an 11" clutch (or what eversize your bellhousing is made for.)

If your son is going to drag it, aftermarket solutions would be best. Lakewood makes a bulletproof bellhousing that is cheap insurance on the street. They are made to handle 11" or smaller clutches.

As far as clutches go, any major manufactures should work. Specifically check out the Centerforce Dual Friction.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jun 21, 2005
#4
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #4
1320stang said:
The FE powered trucks that had toploaders had the deeper bellhousing that required a longer input shaft. If you have one of these and they did make a deeper SBF bellhousing, this might be the easiest solution, although the better one would be to have the tip of the pilot shaft shortened (this is what's longer).
Click to expand...

I think its the other way around; the big block inputs had a shorter pilot bearing snout. I believe it was something like a 3/4" snout for big blocks and 1 1/4" for smallblocks.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jun 21, 2005
#5
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • #5
Larry's got you on the right track. The 390 specific Toploaders came in both close ratio ( 2.32 1st gear) and wide ratio ( 2.78 1st), if I'm not mistaken. The 390 toploader is the one with the small input and short front snout and is the one that'll give you problems if used with either a pickup truck bell for the FE bigblocks, or a small block bell, since all the small block toploaders had the longer snout. If you've got a Galaxie toploader, you're better off trading it for a Stang/Fairlane one, the Galaxie unit uses a completely different trans mount and won't bolt up to a C-4 cross member. As for shifters and parts, Hurst still makes everything you need, but to make the swap a hassle free deal without cutting the floor, you need the correct tailhousing for your car along with the correct shifter and installation kit for your application. For example, if you happen to have a 390 topoader ( and this is aside from the problems with the shorter front snout) it's shifter mounting holes are farther forward than one from a small block application. But there were also some tail housings with both patterns, in that case you'd use the rear set. If you have a big block Toploader, this one has a larger diameter input ( 1-3/8" vs the small block/390's 1-1/16") and you'd be well off to sell it ( they bring big bucks on ebay) to someone who needs this one for the torque of a big block. And don't think that the small block one is weak either, I used to run them behind both a 390 and later a 427, and never broke either from the torque. The small ones from what I've learned over the years are good for up to about 600 hp or ft/lbs torque.
 
H

howardjnl

New Member
Jun 15, 2005
2
0
0
Jun 23, 2005
#6
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #6
Thanks very much folks, much help from you in getting started on the top-loader set up to attach to the engine.

BTW, I have a used, aluminum bell housing I bought last year for $50 and no longer need that fits a T-5 to a 302/351 block. Anyone interested?

John
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
626
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Should I Get a New Clutch Fork and Pivot Ball Stud?
  • AeroCoupe
  • Dec 18, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 21, 2022
96pushrod
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?