• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Benefit Of A 2 1/4" Exhaust On Hipo 289

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikesponycar
  • Start date Start date Dec 18, 2015
M

mikesponycar

New Member
Aug 28, 2013
8
0
2
Dec 18, 2015
#1
  • Dec 18, 2015
  • #1
Hello 'Stangers: I'm new at this forum so bear with me. My '66 K code 2+2 is in the middle of a restoration back to mostly stock, which was a 2" diameter exhaust system. I want to use the cast iron manifolds which have a 2" outlet (actually 1 7/8"). It looks like there's enough thickness there to hog out a little to increase the opening. Is this advisable? Would I get any benefit from going to a 2 1/4" system? Does anyone have any experience with aftermarket iron manifolds? Thanks for your help.

Mike
 

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,415
5,395
194
Corn County USA
Dec 20, 2015
#2
  • Dec 20, 2015
  • #2
I can't speak from experience, but you should gain a little power from enlarging your exhaust. If memory serves, someone somewhere offered exhaust manifolds that were advertised to increase power similar to headers. If you could find them, they might work for you. Or a second option you could do is send your manifolds in somewhere to have them extruded to open the whole manifold instead of just the ends. These are options if you have/want to spend the money. Grinding and enlarging the opening should help a little, just not quite as much. Hope this helps a little.
 
M

mikesponycar

New Member
Aug 28, 2013
8
0
2
Dec 24, 2015
#3
  • Dec 24, 2015
  • #3
Thanks for that, LILCBRA. I want to use the OE manifolds. Good idea about Extrude Hone. I'll check with them, but I'll bet their services are too pricey for me. Sounds like it's down to grinding.
 

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,415
5,395
194
Corn County USA
Dec 27, 2015
#4
  • Dec 27, 2015
  • #4
No problem! I was looking to see if I could find the manifolds that I was talking about, but really wasn't having any luck. I wonder if what I was remembering were probably what you already have. K code manifolds already flow better than average Windsor manifolds, so maybe what I was remembering were reproduction K code manifolds? Anyway, this *could* be a cheaper option if you wanted to keep manifolds instead of going with headers and didn't have K manifolds already? Or if you didn't want to risk damaging some OEM manifolds, you could get some reproduction, or maybe even used 351W manifolds and grind/extrude on them?

(Copied from DIYFord.com...)


The 289 High Performance exhaust manifold looks like an iron shorty header. It also resembles the 351W exhaust manifold. This is a C3OE casting number manifold that may have been cast by an outside supplier. There are no foundry markings on this manifold.
 
M

mikesponycar

New Member
Aug 28, 2013
8
0
2
Dec 28, 2015
#5
  • Dec 28, 2015
  • #5
Thanks for your latest input. Those aftermarkets will do the job, but they just don't look as nice as the originals. Markings aren't as crisp and who knows what the inside is like. I have an OE service replacement with a D3 date - pretty late for a mid 60s engine. Maybe the OEs are smoother on the inside and might flow a little better than the repops.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
982
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
624
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
L
For Sale 1966 GT Fastback
  • lwg8tr0514
  • Apr 29, 2025
  • Classic Mustangs For Sale
Replies
0
Views
1K
Classic Mustangs For Sale Apr 29, 2025
lwg8tr0514
L
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
409
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?