• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

bent special K

  • Thread starter Thread starter will_95gt
  • Start date Start date Sep 30, 2006

will_95gt

Member
Jul 27, 2004
298
1
16
Austin, TX
Sep 30, 2006
#1
  • Sep 30, 2006
  • #1
my front right tire is like three inches farther back then my front left... lol


after further investigation i've realized my k member is bent. anybody know how much a new one runs and how difficult a self-install would be? Would i have to get it re-aligned?
 

Bosko5.0

Active Member
May 18, 2006
1,067
0
37
longwood, FL
Sep 30, 2006
#2
  • Sep 30, 2006
  • #2
1. between $250-700 for a tubular k member
2. difficulty not sure about
3. realignment shall it need
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Sep 30, 2006
#3
  • Sep 30, 2006
  • #3
The isn't too bad, but it is time consuming. Count on spending at least a full day on it. Basically you have to remove the entire front suspension, remove the motor mount to k member bolts, raise the engine up a couple inches and support it there, then remove the 8 bolts holding the k member to the frame. You will need to align the new k member with the frame before bolting it back in place.

Here's the instructions I used when I swapped mine. http://www.maximummotorsports.com/c...r2.pdf?zenid=5c3b050d37f0a559a7572cc8391d5673
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Sep 30, 2006
#4
  • Sep 30, 2006
  • #4
it is very time consuming, plan on an all day event if you know what you are doing. some of them dont fit very well and need the holes to be reamed to install the bolts. not good on a brand new part!!

yes, alignment is needed, as you drop your suspension for the install. anytime you remove suspension compinents, you should get an alignment.
 
9

93GTWannabe

Member
May 11, 2006
81
0
7
Norfolk/Houston
Sep 30, 2006
#5
  • Sep 30, 2006
  • #5
I'll be installing mine prior to my new engine install, so mine shouldn't be to bad... i heard it was a PITA if the motor is still in the car.
 
9

95Mustang302

Member
Mar 30, 2005
302
0
16
Sep 30, 2006
#6
  • Sep 30, 2006
  • #6
are there any k-members out there that I don't ahve to convert to coil overs to use...
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Sep 30, 2006
#7
  • Sep 30, 2006
  • #7
95Mustang302 said:
are there any k-members out there that I don't ahve to convert to coil overs to use...
Click to expand...

QA1 and PA Racing k-members can use stock control arms and springs.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Oct 1, 2006
#8
  • Oct 1, 2006
  • #8
I run a PA racing K member and was extremely happy with its fit and finish. It also offers some of the largest header clearance of any K member out there due to the way it bolts to the frame.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Oct 2, 2006
#9
  • Oct 2, 2006
  • #9
Killercanary said:
I run a PA racing K member and was extremely happy with its fit and finish. It also offers some of the largest header clearance of any K member out there due to the way it bolts to the frame.
Click to expand...
Yeah it does! I was just putting my stock H and headers back on for smog and wow im glad i bought that thing. It made the install a breeze.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 2, 2006
#10
  • Oct 2, 2006
  • #10
:OT:

When I jack up the front of the car I usually use the center of the stock K member to lift the car. I am thinking that's not a good idea on a tubular K member is it?
 
9

95Mustang302

Member
Mar 30, 2005
302
0
16
Oct 2, 2006
#11
  • Oct 2, 2006
  • #11
how much did u pay for your PA racing member?
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Oct 2, 2006
#12
  • Oct 2, 2006
  • #12
95Mustang302 said:
how much did u pay for your PA racing member?
Click to expand...
I think 350. I had to pay 50 bucks more for the spring perches.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Oct 3, 2006
#13
  • Oct 3, 2006
  • #13
95Mustang302 said:
how much did u pay for your PA racing member?
Click to expand...


http://paracing.com/product_info.php?products_id=126&osCsid=8fb4200d9b92614a4aad5e6869aec78b


JJ95GTID- I was concerned about this too, but the guys at PA told me it was OK. I have done it a few times and it wasn't a problem.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 3, 2006
#14
  • Oct 3, 2006
  • #14
Thanks Paul
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
SOLD Trick Flow Box R Series Upper Intake w/90 mm Inlet
  • Habu135
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
381
Engine and Power Adder Aug 19, 2026
Habu135
Suspension Setting Front Alignment - Do I care about the rear's thrust angle?
  • dan50
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
416
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 28, 2025
Kid wita 5oh
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
425
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
334
The Welcome Wagon Aug 18, 2026
josep4
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?