• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Best High-po Tranny?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91redFox
  • Start date Start date Jan 20, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 3 of 6 Next Last

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Feb 7, 2014
#41
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #41
Size isn't everything, metallurgy also plays a role as does the overall design and geometry of the supporting components, e.g. the case. Maybe it's just marketing BS, but Tremec does at least rate the T56 to 700 ft-lbs.
revhead347 said:
I've been through this several times with customers. Here's the deal with the T56....it's expensive. It really boils down to what you want to do with the car. Just about any way you slice it, it ends up costing around $4k to get a T5 or aod out of a Mustang, and then end up driving away with a T56. If you really want a 6 speed transmission, then the T56 is by far the best option. If you don't ever drag race the car on sticky tires, the T56 will work just fine. It you don't have a cam with really fat lobes, the T56 will give you better gas mileage, and less noise while cruising on the highway. That is where the fairy tale ends. It has an unrealistic reputation for strength. the T56 and the 3550 series are built to the exact same technical specs. That is to say, the gears are the same width and strength, and the bearings are the same diameter. In short, the 3550 series and the T56 are equal in their abilities. The reason the T56 gets such a good reputation is simple. It came stock in the Camaro, and for every 1 Camaro that is drag raced on sticky tires, there are 50 Mustangs doing the same with a T5. It's just a perception thing. The TKO600 will cost you at least $1000 less..eh, probably even a greater savings than that. For those of us who have quite a bit of torque, the price points are much better on the TKO stuff as well. Since most Camaro owners don't race their cars, they don't break as often. In this case, less demand means lower production volume, means much higher prices. The price points on T56 parts are approximately 3 times that of a 3550 series. For example, a 26 spline input shaft on 3550 is $68 on ebay right now. The same 26 spline input shaft on a T56 is $330. So every time you break your T56, you are going to end up spending 3 times as much as the guy who broke his TKO.

Kurt
Click to expand...

Size isn't everything, metallurgy also plays a role as does the overall design and geometry of the supporting components, e.g. the case. Maybe it's just marketing BS, but Tremec does at least rate the T56 to 700 ft-lbs. I do agree though, the T56 swap is not cheap.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Feb 7, 2014
#42
  • Feb 7, 2014
  • #42
The gears in both transmission are made from the same grade of steel, have the same engagement surface area, and go through the same hardening process. Any differences in torque rating between different variations of the same transmission all have to do with gear ratios. If you get a 26 spline input shaft for a T56, it has a better design than the equivalent 26 spline 3550 shaft. However, the 26 spline 3550 shaft doesn't have many failures. The case on the 3550 has a tendancy to get cracks, most of which can be fixed with a girdle. It is almost irrelevant, because it is only an issue on very high hp dedicated track cars. Keep in mind that the T56 has a lot more rotating mass, which is more relevant for a drag car.

It would be pointless to try to relay my personal experience of seeing 8 second Mustangs go down the quarter mile with a 3550 transmission. If you don't believe it can be done, that's up to you.

The bottom line is this. If you are looking for a hi-po drag racing transmission, you are going to end up with a 3550 variant. I guarantee if you call Liberty Gear, Astro, or Hanlon and say "I want a hi-po manual transmission to go drag racing with in my Mustang," all of them are going to recommend a TKO600, and not a T-56

Kurt
 
Reactions: krazedstang

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Feb 8, 2014
#43
  • Feb 8, 2014
  • #43
revhead347 said:
It would be pointless to try to relay my personal experience of seeing 8 second Mustangs go down the quarter mile with a 3550 transmission. If you don't believe it can be done, that's up to you.
Click to expand...

I never said i did not believe it, I said i wanted to know who did it.
 

smkshw

5 Year Member
Feb 12, 2010
1,095
235
94
Apr 10, 2014
#44
  • Apr 10, 2014
  • #44
im ordering the tko 600 this weekend.....i wanted to ask someone that has one if the shifter it comes with is decent enough?....or should i order a different one right off the bat?... thanks
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 10, 2014
#45
  • Apr 10, 2014
  • #45
It's ok if you just drive around normally. If you want to shift fast, it's a good idea to get a better shifter.

Kurt
 

smkshw

5 Year Member
Feb 12, 2010
1,095
235
94
Apr 10, 2014
#46
  • Apr 10, 2014
  • #46
revhead347 said:
It's ok if you just drive around normally. If you want to shift fast, it's a good idea to get a better shifter.

Kurt
Click to expand...
thanks....think its a hurst right?....i will upgrade to a pro 5.0 or a mgw,just wanted to at least try what it comes with and feel the difference for myself,plus save a couple bucks until my next order....just dont want it to be terrible or somthing,its a street and occasional track car....
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 10, 2014
#47
  • Apr 10, 2014
  • #47
It's one of the easier things to change later on, so it doesn't hurt to try out the factory one first.

Kurt
 

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Apr 12, 2014
#48
  • Apr 12, 2014
  • #48
What about the G-Force T5? I've seen those in magazines and on the parts sites for years. I've always wondered about them in terms of shift quality and durability, especially with their high power/torque capacity claims. They aren't cheap, but it seems like you wouldn't have to spend quite as much money since you can reuse the stock bellhousing and crossmember.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,106
21,284
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 12, 2014
#49
  • Apr 12, 2014
  • #49
WhiteCobra95 said:
What about the G-Force T5? I've seen those in magazines and on the parts sites for years. I've always wondered about them in terms of shift quality and durability, especially with their high power/torque capacity claims. They aren't cheap, but it seems like you wouldn't have to spend quite as much money since you can reuse the stock bellhousing and crossmember.
Click to expand...

Everything you've read is true with exception of the inherent weakness of the third gear. They're tougher, they shift as well or better than a superduty, and it's a bolt in proposition. All of the weaknesses of the normal T5 are shifted to the one thing that they can't change... The T5 casing itself. The ones that I've seen broken, take the cases with them.

So yeah, they're stronger than a T5 Super-duty but not as strong as the TKOs or some of the other trannies mentioned in this thread.

IMO, they fit the niche of the spirited street driver with a hundred-ish (give or take) HP advantage over the stock HO output, street radials, and street oriented rear suspension upgrades.

If you plan to beat the snot out of it, I would opt for something heavier than G-Force or other tranny that reuses the OEM T5 case and configuration (including Astro).

I'll also say that I think that it's a great lightweight option for some fairly severe street driving or road race conditions.
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Apr 13, 2014
#50
  • Apr 13, 2014
  • #50
Thanks for the info! All of the choices (TKO, 3550, T56, G-Force T5, ...) are fairly expensive, so it's great to get first hand feedback on all of them.

I just checked Jegs and noticed that they have a replacement T-5 case option now. I haven't looked at these for a while, so I'm not sure when this became available.

http://www.jegs.com/i/G-Force-Transmissions/468/GFT5072/10002/-1
http://www.jegs.com/i/G-Force+Transmissions/468/GFT5-SNGF/10002/-1

Now I'm wondering how much torque/hp advantage these provide over the G-Force T5 with the stock case. This is a pretty cool potential option to resolve the case weaknesses that you mentioned. (Hopefully they're cast in the US.)
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,106
21,284
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 13, 2014
#51
  • Apr 13, 2014
  • #51
WhiteCobra95 said:
Thanks for the info! All of the choices (TKO, 3550, T56, G-Force T5, ...) are fairly expensive, so it's great to get first hand feedback on all of them.

I just checked Jegs and noticed that they have a replacement T-5 case option now. I haven't looked at these for a while, so I'm not sure when this became available.

http://www.jegs.com/i/G-Force-Transmissions/468/GFT5072/10002/-1
http://www.jegs.com/i/G-Force Transmissions/468/GFT5-SNGF/10002/-1

Now I'm wondering how much torque/hp advantage these provide over the G-Force T5 with the stock case. This is a pretty cool potential option to resolve the case weaknesses that you mentioned. (Hopefully they're cast in the US.)
Click to expand...


I've no idea how much the beefier case will help. I would imagine that the third hear problem would still be an issue for high torque applications but I do not know for sure.

Maybe some of these other guys have seen this upgrade in person.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 14, 2014
#52
  • Apr 14, 2014
  • #52
They charge more for that upgraded T5 case than you pay for a 3550 case. I know the 3550 case has cracking problems too. I just don't think I could get used to those straight cut gears whining all the time in G-force

Kurt
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,106
21,284
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 14, 2014
#53
  • Apr 14, 2014
  • #53
revhead347 said:
They charge more for that upgraded T5 case than you pay for a 3550 case. I know the 3550 case has cracking problems too. I just don't think I could get used to those straight cut gears whining all the time in G-force

Kurt
Click to expand...

It sings right alongside by blower when I pull the car hard.


I don't have all the upgrades but I do have a T5 with straight cut gears.

I bought it used from a dude switching over to auto. Put new synchros in it before installation, slapped my Tri-X on it, and been riding the hell out it since.

What holds it all together is that my street tires are not very sticky.
 
Last edited: Apr 14, 2014

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 15, 2014
#54
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #54
Cool.

Kurt
 

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Apr 15, 2014
#55
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #55
Here's some info from the G-Force web site. They're available with helical gears (not sure if that's a new option) and there are a lot of ratio choices to fine tune the application.

http://gforcetransmissions.com/t-5_ratio.htm
http://gforcetransmissions.com/tran_gt-5.asp

This approach to a transmission upgrade really intrigues me, especially since it only requires a clutch swap and maybe a new driveshaft yoke, and looks nearly stock. I just wish they weren't so expensive!
 
Last edited: Apr 15, 2014

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,106
21,284
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 15, 2014
#56
  • Apr 15, 2014
  • #56
WhiteCobra95 said:
Here's some info from the G-Force web site. They're available with helical gears (not sure if that's a new option) and there a lot of ratio choices to fine tune the application.

http://gforcetransmissions.com/t-5_ratio.htm
http://gforcetransmissions.com/tran_gt-5.asp

This approach to a transmission upgrade really intrigues me, especially since it only requires a clutch swap and maybe a new driveshaft yoke, and looks nearly stock. I just wish they weren't so expensive!
Click to expand...

You and me both.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

smkshw

5 Year Member
Feb 12, 2010
1,095
235
94
May 5, 2014
#57
  • May 5, 2014
  • #57
tranny is here!...hope its worth it!
View attachment 116175
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,100
2,710
224
Vass, NC
May 9, 2014
#58
  • May 9, 2014
  • #58
There's no question in my mind if the T56 is stronger than the TKO. I have spent an insane amount of hours researching the subject as well looking at the turbo torque monsters and huge displacement performance cars out there. The best there was at the time was the G-Force T56. It survived behind monster turbo stangs, Vipers, camaros, and vettes when the same stangs were ting out TKOs from 3rd and 4th gear roll-ons. I'm sure tranzilla is equivalent or better than the G-force unit, but also mega-$.

I am fascinated with the T-56 magnum, though. The gear sets in that tranny are the same as the ones in the TR6060, and it will be the next tranny to go behind my turbo 331. I want to spend the money right the first time. I love the .50 rear gear for cruising - lower decibels and better fuel economy. I like the closer spacing on the other gear set, but I'd rather compromise and take the wider spacing for the cruising. My car isn't a race car... just a fast (to me) street car.
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
May 10, 2014
#59
  • May 10, 2014
  • #59
@FastDriver, i just talked with liberty last week about the magnums. The have upgraded units in 1000+ hp cars and are havent had a failure
 
Reactions: FastDriver

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
May 11, 2014
#60
  • May 11, 2014
  • #60
We're up in the air about a T56 and a Magnum now. At first I saw some troubling news on engagement mechanisms breaking on the 6060s, but I talked to Bob Hanlon, and he said he has had no problems with his Corvette Challenge cars.

Kurt
 
Reactions: FastDriver
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 3 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
932
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
651
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?