• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Best rear for a '66 coupe

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gellpak
  • Start date Start date Jun 14, 2004

Gellpak

Member
Nov 28, 2003
147
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Jun 14, 2004
#1
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #1
I'm seriously considering swapping my rear for some sort of trac-lock rear for performance purposes, but i don't really know where to begin. I know i saw on these boards a couple of months ago about someone spending $1200 for a good setup. Is this the average cost of such a thing, or is there a cheaper way to get the same results (i've seen some things about explorer rears) and engage both my rear wheels? If I do this I want to do it right so I'll want to pay attention to the gearing (i need help there too). Anyone know, for starters, whether I should go for an 8" or 9" rear?
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Jun 14, 2004
#2
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #2
9" all the way!!
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 14, 2004
#3
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #3
9" locker... It's like going from baby bear to papa bear...
 

NorCal66

New Member
Aug 12, 2003
334
0
0
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA HOME
Jun 14, 2004
#4
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #4
If you're gettin a whole new rear go with a 9", it's even used by some chevy guys because it's that damn good. An 8" would be fine if you weren't gonna be pushing too much power, but why not go bigger for a little bit more. You could spend that much for a brand new rear from Currie or some other vendor, but most people get used rears. You can get a 9" out of certain stangs and versailles...but I don't know which years.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Jun 14, 2004
#5
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #5
Unless you drag race on a regular basis, a well built 8" will work just fine. I am beginning to see more and more at road race events. It has to do with less rotating mass which equals more horsepower.

I am a Currie guy so check with them.

A good all around performance gear would be in the 3.40 to 3.53 range. I use a 3.89 which is a little high (or low depending on how you want to phrase it) for road racing but it does help in the "torque" department and it works OK up top because I run a 5-speed (Good for 145 at Daytona).

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

Attachments

  • Daytona1w.webp
    35.9 KB · Views: 138

Gellpak

Member
Nov 28, 2003
147
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Jun 14, 2004
#6
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #6
OK, well then I guess the next step would be to figure out what kind of car to go searching for for a used 9...
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jun 14, 2004
#7
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #7
http://www.kevinstang.com/Ninecase.htm

Here's a website with a ton of 9" rear info.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 14, 2004
#8
  • Jun 14, 2004
  • #8
Be carefull! The 65-66 cars have a 52" housing... They are a bit more tough to find...
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Jun 15, 2004
#9
  • Jun 15, 2004
  • #9
I have a Currie 9" 51.75" drum to drum.

Detroit true trac, 3:73 gears

It's solid as a rock, two years under the 66 with decent HP from a stroker. I drag race about 50 passes per year and drive to work a couple of times per week.

Only complaint is that it was expensive.........

Go 9" and don't look back, if you want to put any type of respectible HP to the ground and don't want to worry about breakage you'll be happy.

If you road race or don't hook well you can get away with an 8"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Radio, Speaker Upgrades
  • TripleYellow
  • Apr 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
135
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 24, 2026
TripleYellow
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
129
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
F
Rear Drum Brakes
  • Fri Guy
  • Jan 3, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 8, 2025
Scrapla347
9
Brakes Rear brakes feel stuck after replacing pads and rotors
  • 99stanggtvinx
  • Aug 31, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
520
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 1, 2024
nickyb
R
8.8 rear end for '67 coupe, shortened - next steps
  • rubendenver
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
736
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 8, 2025
GOvert
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?