• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Best way to lift 69 rear end.

  • Thread starter Thread starter pastorboy
  • Start date Start date Dec 29, 2005
P

pastorboy

New Member
Dec 29, 2005
4
0
0
Dec 29, 2005
#1
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #1
I have a 68 coupe and the 17 in wheels are rubbing. What is the cheapest and quickest way to fix the ride? I was thinking of coil overs?//
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
Frankfort, Ky
Dec 29, 2005
#2
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #2
cheapest would be lift blocks like on 4x4s.
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Dec 29, 2005
#3
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #3
Raising the ride height won't eliminate the interference. It will only make contact less frequent. It will also cause worse handling and braking, and it looks dorky.

Lift blocks only work where the axle housing sits under the leaf spring.

If you're set on raising the ride height, there is a set of leaf springs out there that is claimed to give you a one-inch rise. The claimed purpose is to make the rear match the front, which in OE form sits higher. I can't recall where I've seen these, but it was in one of those full page ads in Mustang & Fords, from Laurel or Virginia Mustang or Dallas. Not Mustangs Plus, although I wouldn't be surprised if M+ has them too.

The other ways to cure rear wheel interference are to roll the fender lips, replace the rims with a set with greater backspacing (it's always easier to buy too much backspacing and reduce it with a spacer, than it is to add backspacing, which is impossible short of machining the mounting surface), or shorten the axle tubes and shafts (way, way too expensive).
 
S

strange65

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
71
0
0
Dec 29, 2005
#4
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #4
I would say shackles or air shocks, dont they still make the gabriel hijacker's?
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Dec 29, 2005
#5
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #5
pastorboy said:
I have a 68 coupe and the 17 in wheels are rubbing. What is the cheapest and quickest way to fix the ride? I was thinking of coil overs?//
Click to expand...

Go back to 13", 14" or max 15" as the car was designed.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 29, 2005
#6
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #6
If you had the correct size tires, 17's shouldn't be a problem. Most early Stangs were designed to use 25-26" tall tires. Wider ones require the correct wheel offset to work. Several ways to lift the rear. Best way is new springs ( if you haven't done this yet, now's the time) Other options are longer spring shackles, air shocks, or load levelers ( coil over shocks)
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Dec 29, 2005
#7
  • Dec 29, 2005
  • #7
get the real long rear shackles...they are the coolest things going.
 

Alarus

New Member
Apr 29, 2005
226
0
0
Az
Dec 30, 2005
#8
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #8
LMan said:
get the real long rear shackles...they are the coolest things going.
Click to expand...
you mean the 8 inch long ones that stick out like a sore thumb? those are soo cool
i saw a 60's model with shackles that stuck out like 5 inches below the body near where i work...that was the first thing i noticed about that car it was kinda funny.
 

jes72mustang

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
224
1
0
S. Central PA
Dec 30, 2005
#9
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #9
I don't know if they would fit the '68, but I have a pair of 2" lift Feaf springs sitting in my shed that I took off my '72 coupe and replaced with 1 inch lowering springs.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 30, 2005
#10
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #10
Alarus said:
you mean the 8 inch long ones that stick out like a sore thumb? those are soo cool
i saw a 60's model with shackles that stuck out like 5 inches below the body near where i work...that was the first thing i noticed about that car it was kinda funny.
Click to expand...
Hey, don't laugh "back in the day" that was the easiset, cheapest way to accomplish lifting the rear. We didn't have the options that y'all have now to do the same. Air shocks were over a hundred a pair ( that translates to about $1000 a set in today's money) Ditto for coil-overs. And forget the aftermarket rear leafs you have today, they didn't exist then.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Dec 30, 2005
#11
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #11
HistoricMustang said:
Go back to 13", 14" or max 15" as the car was designed.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
Click to expand...


Rim diameter has nothing to do with interference. Wheel offset and outside diameter of the tire have everything to do with it.
 
S

Steve69

Member
May 11, 2005
233
0
16
Dec 30, 2005
#12
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #12
2 Inch lift leaf springs.

 

Attachments

  • mustangdone0086hz.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 268
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Dec 30, 2005
#13
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #13
Are the springs original?

You might be able to get away with replaceing your saggy originals with a new set of stiffer 5 leafs.

Blocks arn't an option. Since mustangs have the leaf sprigs go under the axle, blocks would end up lowering the car instead of raising it.
 
G

gzminiz

New Member
Oct 15, 2004
200
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Dec 30, 2005
#14
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #14
Steve69 said:
Click to expand...

is that a photochop or real mustang?
 

Attachments

  • mustangdone0086hz.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 272

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Dec 30, 2005
#15
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #15
gzminiz said:
is that a photochop or real mustang?
Click to expand...

thats a real mustang
 
G

gzminiz

New Member
Oct 15, 2004
200
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Dec 30, 2005
#16
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #16
i am sure no one likes it but I think it looks nice. A little higher in the back then I am going to do but I like the way that looks. Looks like it would eat anything infront of it. Just looks plain mean.
 
S

Steve69

Member
May 11, 2005
233
0
16
Dec 30, 2005
#17
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #17
ANOTHER VEIW

 

Attachments

  • ek14md.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 268
G

gzminiz

New Member
Oct 15, 2004
200
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Dec 30, 2005
#18
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #18
guessing that is yours, i love it. Looks great.
 
S

Steve69

Member
May 11, 2005
233
0
16
Dec 30, 2005
#19
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • #19
Thanks

Im going to go down a couple sizes on the rear tires this spring. There a
little to big.

Steve69
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
1969 15x10 295's for rear. Modifications needed?
  • normg
  • May 1, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
164
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 2, 2026
GypsyR
G
S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
85
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
T
New Guy from Southeast Missouri
  • tcooke11
  • Jan 10, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
269
The Welcome Wagon Jan 17, 2026
TomcatPC
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
429
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?