• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Big Blocks and Coupes

  • Thread starter Thread starter GT Trooper
  • Start date Start date Sep 8, 2005

GT Trooper

Member
Feb 16, 2004
87
0
7
Redford
Sep 8, 2005
#1
  • Sep 8, 2005
  • #1
I'm currently considering a 514 crate motor for my 87 notch. My first choice was a 408. I'm continually told a big block could hinder the performance due to weight issues. Any input on this would be greatly appreciated.
 

ExplodingGopher

New Member
Jun 11, 2004
517
0
0
The mistake on the lake (Ohio)
Sep 8, 2005
#2
  • Sep 8, 2005
  • #2
It just feels like a fat kid is sitting on your hood when you stop, seriously. its only a 260lb difference between a 302 and an iron headed 460. The hp and tq make up for it. I would've went with a 514 but couldn't afford an extra $1000 for it, when something goes in my motor, it'll be a 545
 

GT Trooper

Member
Feb 16, 2004
87
0
7
Redford
Sep 8, 2005
#3
  • Sep 8, 2005
  • #3
Did you have any traction issues?
 

ExplodingGopher

New Member
Jun 11, 2004
517
0
0
The mistake on the lake (Ohio)
Sep 9, 2005
#4
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #4
as long as i give it no more than 1/3 throttle it gets traction. if i had some drag radials on the back, which is my next big thing, then it would be a different story.
 
E

emeraldcoupe

Founding Member
Jul 1, 2000
269
1
18
florida
Sep 9, 2005
#5
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #5
do it. the biggest mistake i made was selling my 460 powered 85 tbird. as soon as i can afford to build another, my coupe will have a 460 + in it.
 

GT Trooper

Member
Feb 16, 2004
87
0
7
Redford
Sep 9, 2005
#6
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #6
Standard motor mounts or engine cradles
 
E

emeraldcoupe

Founding Member
Jul 1, 2000
269
1
18
florida
Sep 9, 2005
#7
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #7
i used ford mounts and pro mustang headers, fit perfect. stay away from the hooker 6224 swap headers, they fit like ****. here's an old pic
 
D

dead

New Member
Apr 3, 2003
43
0
0
Mississauga, Ontario
Sep 9, 2005
#8
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #8
I was often considering a similar project, but when you can get a 408 to over 500 hp easily or just get a built 306 with a power adder, you'll be making as much if not more power than a big block. I mean they're a cool concept and all, I'm just not sure if I see the point.

On another note, you can also get an aluminum 460 crate engine from Ford... nice power and the weight difference is negligable from a 5L.
 
P

Phatt_daddy

Member
Apr 22, 2005
219
1
19
Hytop, AL
Sep 9, 2005
#9
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #9
So yea if you build a nice little 306 with a power adder you will dave as much power as a big block done a little over stock, BUT what if you take a big block with a good strong build that is capable of pump gas and a 3 to 400 shot of laughing gas or a pure motor with about 700+ hp, what say you then?

I say go for the bb and if you dont mind doing a little cutting , put in some mini tubbs.

Just my .02
Nate
 

GT Trooper

Member
Feb 16, 2004
87
0
7
Redford
Sep 9, 2005
#10
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #10
Much appreciated guys. I think it's going to be the big block.
 

GT Trooper

Member
Feb 16, 2004
87
0
7
Redford
Sep 9, 2005
#11
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #11
emeraldcoupe said:
i used ford mounts and pro mustang headers, fit perfect. stay away from the hooker 6224 swap headers, they fit like ****. here's an old pic
Click to expand...


Did you have to go with a heavier duty front spring? Did you have to beat on the body to get the headers/transmission to fit properly? Is it much of a problem getting to plugs?
 
E

emeraldcoupe

Founding Member
Jul 1, 2000
269
1
18
florida
Sep 9, 2005
#12
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • #12
no cutting,welding,beating,etc. all bolt in like it's meant to be there. plug access is a snap. people who say you have to beat the tunnel for a c-6 are wrong, fits perfect. the only things close with the c-6 are the top bellhousing bolts(engine/trans MUST go in together) and the linkage is a little tight but you can get to it no prob. i used the stock 5.0 tbird springs and it sat fine. leave the sway bar on and it handles pretty decent, not a coner carver but good. also used a manual rack and 225-55-16's up front and it was easy to steer. made a killer street car, never overheated, 180 all day. stangs,vettes,and the gm twins got suprised by the bird one more than one occasion
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
663
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
F
Fox T5 with big block?
  • Foxy86LX
  • Apr 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
320
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2025
nickyb
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
580
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
O
Help
  • OnisimusD
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
430
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 14, 2025
OnisimusD
O
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
882
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?