• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Brake free play issue after installing CSRP front disc power brake conversion kit on 1965 Mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustang6518
  • Start date Start date Jan 31, 2021
M

mustang6518

New Member
Jan 31, 2021
3
0
1
gtrdhgfhgf
Jan 31, 2021
#1
  • Jan 31, 2021
  • #1
Upgraded a 65 mustang from drum brakes to front disc power brakes using a CSRP conversion kit. Kit went on fine, but when the car is turned on there's a good 3" of completely free play in the brake pedal before it gets firm and starts actually braking. If I adjust the pushrod length pretty far out then there's no play, but that causes the brake pedal to be up ridiculously high - much, much higher than the gas pedal and practically in your lap. Even with the current situation, the brake pedal is still a little too high at 3.5" higher than the gas pedal.

When the car is off, there's about 1" of free play in the brake pedal, and then once I turn the car on and the booster is being used, the free play is around 3-3.5".

I've tried the below troubleshooting steps already, which have made zero difference:
  • Master cylinder was bench bled
  • Brakes have been bled in order several times
  • Brake pedal does not "pump up", further indicating that there's no air in the lines
  • Rear drum brakes have been adjusted to slightly drag
  • Replaced all brake lines with stainless steel and re-bled everything again
  • I was thinking maybe I need a 10-PSI residual pressure valve for rear drum brakes, but the site where I bought the kit claims the master cylinder already has an "integral residual pressure valve" of 10-PSI
  • I've checked the booster to master cylinder pushrod length with one of these adjustment tools and the rod is dead-on (zero/almost zero gap)
  • I thought maybe I need a new brake pedal, but I've read that the 65 and 66 Mustangs used the exact same pedal for manual and power brakes, and only in 67 and newer did they use different pedals... This is the only thing I can think of left - something different needs to be done with the pedal, even though supposedly the 65's used the same pedal across manual and power brakes.... I think Mustang Steve's conversion kit comes with a pin that you're meant to weld in around 1" lower on the brake pedal, and a different generic kit I saw includes what looks like a custom pin that you just tighten down after drilling a new hole, instead of welding in:
Very, very, frustrating experience. I've read multiple posts on various sites of people having the same/similar issue, but haven't seen any solution yet. Any ideas on what to do from here?
 
Last edited: Jan 31, 2021

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
229
93
Nashville TN
Jan 31, 2021
#2
  • Jan 31, 2021
  • #2
What is the master cylinder bore size? A larger bore will result in shorter travel and greater pedal effort(not a big thing with power brakes) while a smaller bore will result in less effort and more travel. The factory "fruit jar" is a 1" bore. I have said it before and will say it again...all swapping to power brakes does is cause it not to work like it should...there are a ton of kits out there and very few are actually designed to work well in a vintage mustang.

From my own personal experience with moving the pedal rod(in my case on a hydraulic clutch conversion), moving the pedal mounting point up the pedal provided shorter travel and marginally increased effort...down was reduced effort and longer throw...however, there is a strict limit to how far up or down the pedal the pushrod can be moved, otherwise it WILL cause the master cylinder to suck air into the system.

The fact of the matter is that if the system is not working correctly, its a badly designed kit...maybe they changed out the calipers and the 1" bore master is all of a sudden not moving enough fluid to actuate them properly, causing a longer throw, etc etc etc. Power brakes do NOT stop better, they are only an advantage if actuating manual brakes is a problem for some reason.
 
Last edited: Jan 31, 2021
Reactions: 2Blue2
M

mustang6518

New Member
Jan 31, 2021
3
0
1
gtrdhgfhgf
Jan 31, 2021
#3
  • Jan 31, 2021
  • #3
wicked93gs said:
What is the master cylinder bore size? A larger bore will result in shorter travel and greater pedal effort(not a big thing with power brakes) while a smaller bore will result in less effort and more travel. The factory "fruit jar" is a 1" bore. I have said it before and will say it again...all swapping to power brakes does is cause it not to work like it should...there are a ton of kits out there and very few are actually designed to work well in a vintage mustang.

From my own personal experience with moving the pedal rod(in my case on a hydraulic clutch conversion), moving the pedal mounting point up the pedal provided shorter travel and marginally increased effort...down was reduced effort and longer throw...however, there is a strict limit to how far up or down the pedal the pushrod can be moved, otherwise it WILL cause the master cylinder to suck air into the system.

The fact of the matter is that if the system is not working correctly, its a badly designed kit...maybe they changed out the calipers and the 1" bore master is all of a sudden not moving enough fluid to actuate them properly, causing a longer throw, etc etc etc. Power brakes do NOT stop better, they are only an advantage if actuating manual brakes is a problem for some reason.
Click to expand...
From the website for the kit I used, it looks like a MC with 1" bore:

Master Cylinder: Iron, 15/16" bore manual (with adjustable push rod) or 1" power, dual reservoir, front disk rear drum, optional 4 wheel disc type available, 3/8"-24 female flare forward outlet, 7/16"-24 female flare aft outlet
Click to expand...
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
229
93
Nashville TN
Feb 1, 2021
#4
  • Feb 1, 2021
  • #4
If I were to upgrade to power brakes(I wouldn't) I would go with a larger master cylinder bore size than stock...doing so will shorten pedal travel. I think that is the root of the problem with many of these conversions...they add more or larger slave cylinders inside the calipers, then don't account for the needed increase in fluid flow by going to a larger master cylinder. In the end, where you really need to start is measuring your brake line pressure...once you know your pressure you can determine whether the master cylinder is up to the job or not....even if it is marginally ok for the application, that does NOT mean the throw is acceptable.
 
Reactions: 2Blue2
M

mustang6518

New Member
Jan 31, 2021
3
0
1
gtrdhgfhgf
Feb 13, 2021
#5
  • Feb 13, 2021
  • #5
Unfortunately still fighting with this. Tried a couple more things:
  • The kit maker sent me a replacement brake booster, thinking maybe it was faulty, but the replacement booster has made no difference
  • Pulled out the master cylinder and "dead headed" it by plugging the brake line holes, and then tried to depress the MC -- it's hard to push, which should indicate the master cylinder is good. If I really put my weight into it it will move maybe an 1/8"
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
229
93
Nashville TN
Feb 14, 2021
#6
  • Feb 14, 2021
  • #6
mustang6518 said:
Unfortunately still fighting with this. Tried a couple more things:
  • The kit maker sent me a replacement brake booster, thinking maybe it was faulty, but the replacement booster has made no difference
  • Pulled out the master cylinder and "dead headed" it by plugging the brake line holes, and then tried to depress the MC -- it's hard to push, which should indicate the master cylinder is good. If I really put my weight into it it will move maybe an 1/8"
Click to expand...
This doesn't tell you much. I tried "bench bleeding" my MC for my clutch...no matter what I did, I couldnt get the piston to move much at all...once installed in the car, it was easy. In other words, without the leverage of the brake pedal, you aren't going to be able to get much movement out of the piston in the MC...at least not without a jig built specifically for that.
 
M

Monsterstang#137

New Member
Sep 14, 2021
1
0
1
Culver city
Sep 14, 2021
#7
  • Sep 14, 2021
  • #7
wicked93gs said:
This doesn't tell you much. I tried "bench bleeding" my MC for my clutch...no matter what I did, I couldnt get the piston to move much at all...once installed in the car, it was easy. In other words, without the leverage of the brake pedal, you aren't going to be able to get much movement out of the piston in the MC...at least not without a jig built specifically for that.
Click to expand...
This seems to be a very popular subject with these conversions kits, I’m presently dealing with the same identical issues. Has there been a fix that anyone knows of? Thanks for the help
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,159
21,331
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 15, 2021
#8
  • Sep 15, 2021
  • #8
Monsterstang#137 said:
This seems to be a very popular subject with these conversions kits, I’m presently dealing with the same identical issues. Has there been a fix that anyone knows of? Thanks for the help
Click to expand...
Why, yes. Bleed it after installing it in the car.
 
D

DRGunn427

Member
Feb 26, 2025
4
4
13
Houston, Texas USA
Feb 26, 2025
#9
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • #9
Ever any resolve to this issue? I've got the same issue going on with my install. Looks like it was referred to as a common issue but I never see any solutions that worked. Any help is appreciated!
 
L

lwg8tr0514

Member
Apr 29, 2025
3
2
13
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 29, 2025
#10
  • Apr 29, 2025
  • #10
I had this issue with a 4 wheel disk conversion on my 67 convertible restomod. Mushy pedal, which engaged too late, and then was like no power brakes at all. I fired the parts cannon at, not recommended. I have a 351 with a radical cam and only pulling 8" of vacuum. That was issue #1, got an electric vacuum pump and replaced it with a new single diaphragm 9" Bendix type booster. I also had to shave down the end of the pushrod as the brake lights were always on, it was a simple 1/16" off the pushrod with a Dremel, and that fixed that. That pedal travel was due to a bad proportioning valve weeping a little bit of fluid. The fitting into block was a cross threaded. I replaced the proportioning valve and re-bent the lines to more properly align. Next, I did a real thorough, rebleed starting with the pass left rear and moving forward. Lots of coffee colored fluid(water-soaked) came out. Those three things worked, and now I have brakes that a modern car would be jealous of.
 
Reactions: 2Blue2 and Noobz347
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1970 brake issue. Bad booster or?
  • All Stock93
  • May 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
729
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2025
All Stock93
D
Brakes 1966 Mustang convertible 289, Auto - Disc brake conversion issues
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
687
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 23, 2026
All Stock93
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
88
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
D
Brakes 88 LX 5.0 - help! no brakes
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
436
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 27, 2025
nickyb
C
Fox Cobra Style Brake booster kit
  • Crigano
  • Aug 17, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 25, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?