• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

building a 347 what intake???

  • Thread starter Thread starter aod92
  • Start date Start date Oct 28, 2007

aod92

New Member
Jun 4, 2005
104
0
0
Oct 28, 2007
#1
  • Oct 28, 2007
  • #1
I'm building a stock block 347 with a coast rotating assembly. I have a set of ported trick flow tw heads that flow just under 300 cfm. The intake i have is the trickflow street heat. Is that intake gonna be to small? If it is what intake do you guys suggest? Also what kind of numbers should i expect with this 347 and my ported heads to the rear wheels? It is going thru a c4 trans. Thanks!
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
Oct 28, 2007
#2
  • Oct 28, 2007
  • #2
300 CFM should make a stout 347! When you start flowing around that much though you might sacrifice torque down low or run into some driveability problems in a street car.

I'd go with a TFS intake or a Performer II intake. Stay away from cobra or explorer type intakes.

It's hard to say how much power you'll make. It depends a lot on the cam and CR.

You should be able to make 400 RWHP pretty easy with the right cam and a good tune.
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Oct 28, 2007
#3
  • Oct 28, 2007
  • #3
I am gathering parts for a similar combo to yours. I am going to run my TFS trackheat and see how it does.
 

MrXCESSIVESPEED

Member
Mar 10, 2002
0
1
6
Maryland
Oct 29, 2007
#4
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #4
TFS R would get my vote....
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Oct 29, 2007
#5
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #5
Really depends on the cam, CR and intentions of the car....

With a healthy cam and shifting above 7000rpm with a 4:30 gear or so I'd look into a Victor 5.0 or a ported Holley SysteMAX II. If your more street car oriented I'd look into a box stock Holley or RPM II, or even the TFS-R.

Whats the entire combo? Whats the weight of the car? 5spd or Auto? Rear Gear? Exhaust size?
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 29, 2007
#6
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #6
Yea i think we need to know a little more about the combo/intentions for the car. Is this going to be a street or strip car? How streetable is acceptable for you? What kind of converter are you looking at running? What gear?

I think you are going to want a very healthy intake if your heads flow that much. Definitely something like an RPM II or a systemax II. The TFS-R would work...even a TFS box.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 29, 2007
#7
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #7
I see three issues of a little concern:

- Stock Block
- Revving past 7,000
- Potential to make 400+ rwhp

The power output will depend on compression, camshaft, accessories, attention to detail, and engine builder.

Otherwise, I like the Holley myself.
 

aod92

New Member
Jun 4, 2005
104
0
0
Oct 29, 2007
#8
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #8
The rest of my combo is an anderson b31 cam, c4 trans 4000 stall, 3:73 gear, and all the bolt crap you can buy. The car is not a daily driver, it is a street /strip car that sees more street but only on nice sunny days. With everything i have last year the car went 11.67@112 with a stock shortblock with 140K miles on it.
 

egan_gt

New Member
Apr 14, 2005
37
0
0
hibbing MN
Oct 29, 2007
#9
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #9
Im running a typhoon on my 347 w/ AFR 185s and a Z cam. Probably wasnt my brightest idea to run a typhoon, but money was short. From what Ive read, Im thinking of going with either a Holley or a TFS intake?
 

aod92

New Member
Jun 4, 2005
104
0
0
Oct 29, 2007
#10
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #10
egan_gt said:
Im running a typhoon on my 347 w/ AFR 185s and a Z cam. Probably wasnt my brightest idea to run a typhoon, but money was short. From what Ive read, Im thinking of going with either a Holley or a TFS intake?
Click to expand...

What kind of numbers does your car put down?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Oct 29, 2007
#11
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #11
A stock Victor 5.0 will feed that, TF Box or you could go with an EFI conversion like Victor Jr. An R is a good long runner for it as well as a ported Holley SMII.
 

egan_gt

New Member
Apr 14, 2005
37
0
0
hibbing MN
Oct 29, 2007
#12
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #12
aod92 said:
What kind of numbers does your car put down?
Click to expand...

It made 310 hp/ 340 tq. That is with no tune and I was going way lean at WOT, like 16:1. I am running 30lb injectors w/ a 255lph pump and the fuel pressure was at 42lbs with the vacuum line plugged in.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 29, 2007
#13
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #13
ported Systemax intake gets my vote
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Oct 29, 2007
#14
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #14
5spd GT said:
I see three issues of a little concern:

- Stock Block
- Revving past 7,000
- Potential to make 400+ rwhp

The power output will depend on compression, camshaft, accessories, attention to detail, and engine builder.

Otherwise, I like the Holley myself.
Click to expand...

+1

aren't all the TF intakes the same? I thought the trackheat and the R just had more port work done to them.

Buddy of mine is running the holley and it make very good power.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 29, 2007
#15
  • Oct 29, 2007
  • #15
This is going off memory, but if I recall the TFS-R has an 11.5" runner while the trackheat has a 12" runner. The ports at the head are the same, but the TFS-R is larger "up-top"...
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 30, 2007
#16
  • Oct 30, 2007
  • #16
bingo 5 spd if you look on there website they have one lower
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 31, 2007
#17
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #17
The TFS R lower is NOT the same as the street/track lower. Had both, been there/done that.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 31, 2007
#18
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #18
According to trickflow the port dimensions are the same at the bottom, but larger on top, where the upper meets the lower..

My reference above was to the lower intake alone if there is any confusion.
 
M

Mr. Scary 5.0

New Member
Oct 16, 2007
10
0
0
Oct 31, 2007
#19
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #19
depends on gear, and rpm range. I would shoot for either a TFS track heat or Edelbrock RPM II, these make great power in the 1500 to 6500rpm range.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
428
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
946
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Engine HELP - 351W Based Build Under Stock Hood
  • thinkfaster
  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?