C&L vs. Pro M mass air

91notch5.0

Founding Member

Apr 15, 2001

623

0

16

warren mi

Jul 29, 2008

#1

• Jul 29, 2008

• #1

i have the 73mm c&l with the rubber tube that goes to the intake. the car is tuned for this setup right now. i will be adding some kind of a power pipe if i keep this setup.
i just got a 75mm pro m meter with the aluminum tube that goes to the intake.

is it worth switching? has anyone tried both?

 

NIKwoaC

中國製造

15 Year Member

Oct 31, 2006

5,525

943

214

Chengdu Province

Jul 30, 2008

#2

• Jul 30, 2008

• #2

I've heard from some that the Pro-M is a good quality unit, and I've also heard from some that the C&L is not. But that being said, I've seen people use the C&L successfully in both N/A and forced induction setups. Why do you have both?

 

S

Sicarius428

Active Member

Jan 6, 2004

2,085

5

49

Jul 30, 2008

#3

• Jul 30, 2008

• #3

Pro-M gets my vote.
Kevin

 

91notch5.0

Founding Member

Apr 15, 2001

623

0

16

warren mi

Jul 30, 2008

#4

• Jul 30, 2008

• #4

i'm hearing the c&l is not good. the pro m has a aluminum elbow on it which is a plus because i need to replace the rubber elbow anyway.....,