C&L vs PRO-M

Slow5.0

Active Member

Feb 13, 2003

2,554

0

46

Portland, OR

Aug 4, 2004

#1

• Aug 4, 2004

• #1

I have problem with my Stang after I installed heads and cam, looks like I have wrong MASS (I have one PRO-M 75mm for 24# from fox-body) looks like I runn TOO LEAN and I have pinging really bad,
I wanna buy BRAND NEW mass (not like last time I buy used one) but I don't know which one is better, people say PRO-M works better but C&L is cheapper and cheapper for getting bigger tube for bigger injectors

 

95snoozer

Active Member

Dec 14, 2002

2,572

1

48

RCR

Aug 4, 2004

#2

• Aug 4, 2004

• #2

pro m 80 or 77

dont mess with the c&l or you are asking for trouble.

whats your timing at? put it at 10 until you tune it despite what your mechanic says.

 

VIPERn94Five-0

Founding Member

Apr 28, 2002

3,352

2

58

Poughkeepsie, NY

Aug 4, 2004

#3

• Aug 4, 2004

• #3

Pro-M 77 or 80mm the only 2 meters you should even consider imo....


Anthony

 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!

Founding Member

Jan 14, 2001

6,819

64

129

New York

Aug 4, 2004

#4

• Aug 4, 2004

• #4

I've ran both on my fox and the c&l made better power everywhere and when i had 24lb injectors, it idled a hell of a lot better then the 80mm pro m. I have the pro m on the car now with 30's and the maf is for 24's. I made it work with a remote optimizer.

 

Joes95GT

New Member

Jan 23, 2003

3,132

1

0

Delaware

Aug 4, 2004

#5

• Aug 4, 2004

• #5

If you plan on getting a professional dyno tune with a chip, I'd get a C&L.

If you plan on using a Tweecer, I'd get a Pro-M.

Joe

 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member

Feb 1, 2002

1,184

2

38

Macomb, MI (metro detroit)

Aug 4, 2004

#6

• Aug 4, 2004

• #6

I have a Pro-M 75mm Bullet and it has ran perfectly. Supposedly the C&L has more issues because it produces the signal by fooling the computer, so its not the most precise measurement.

 

Venom351R

Founding Member

Apr 27, 2002

4,548

41

98

MAINE

Aug 4, 2004

#7

• Aug 4, 2004

• #7

Ive had a C&L for over a yr now and its run fine on the car when it was N/A and since its been supercharged. Even though I have no issues w/ it I want to switch to a PRO-M 80MM calibrated for a S/C so it will run richer up top but I did have probs w/ running lean on the dyno, weather it was the C&L or not Im not sure but I want to try Pro-M so I can decided for myself on which one is better.

 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"

15 Year Member

Nov 29, 1999

14,679

424

154

Boca Raton, Florida

Aug 4, 2004

#8

• Aug 4, 2004

• #8

Four years ago when I had my bullet meter and 24# injector fiasco, Pro-M told me they were having problems. Maybe you got one of those. I had to return my meter 2 times before selling it on Ebay. I also have owned a C&L meter and it sucked bad to. The Pro-M 77 meter has cleaned up many messes for me. It's out of a Fox body as well.

 

GTJake

Founding Member

Oct 28, 2002

3,049

0

56

Ann Arbor, MI

Aug 4, 2004

#9

• Aug 4, 2004

• #9

Joes95GT said:

If you plan on getting a professional dyno tune with a chip, I'd get a C&L.

If you plan on using a Tweecer, I'd get a Pro-M.

Joe

Click to expand...

Why? Do you think a C&L is better when it can be fully tuned up?

Jake

 

HoofnIt

Founding Member

Jan 8, 2001

1,175

0

36

North Carolina

Aug 4, 2004

#10

• Aug 4, 2004

• #10

I'm running a Pro M 80mm since I did my HCI and although the computer is still learning the changes, I don't have any pinging, even in the extreme desert heat! I would without a doubt by a Pro M over a C&L.