• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

C5 vs. Minor Bolt on 5.0?!?!?!

  • Thread starter Thread starter MadHandle8169
  • Start date Start date Jul 9, 2004
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Jul 9, 2004
#1
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #1
I left my girlfriends and saw some guy in a bmw (never was behind him so I dont know what model) so i started messing with him. He was a tool and was like "O ur tough u want to get a ticket?" after I sped off. Normally I would agree with him but it was 1:00 AM and we were the only 2 cars on a road with trees on both sides. So I responded don't get mad because you bought an over-priced civic. We then went our seperate ways. Then I see those infamous corvette tail lights. It was a lime green probably around 2000 or 2001 C5. I was like what the hell he will kill me but it will be my first real race in a while. So then i got next to him nailed it to see if he was game. He nailed it and let me catch up. I caught up and we went from second gear.

Roll = Bad for near stock 5.0 vs. LS1

We raced through second and a little into third and he only had a half a car to a car on me but was starting to pull a little more.
Next race same scenario same outcome and then he sped off into the night
I wish I saw his face when I told him my mods. I say this because I have raced my friends 2000 Firebird Formula with just exhaust and a lid and its a lot worse then this guy beat me. Now he has a 150 shot but thats a whole different story. Maybe the C5 driver sucked at driving or something I don't know but it was fun. I wish I had a shot at him from a stop I prolly would have been able to hold him off through 3rd judging by his previous performance. All in all a fun safe night!

O Well time for a 100 shot of Nitrous!


Cliff notes->Safe fun night in which C5 wins both but a lot closer than presumed.

 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Jul 9, 2004
#2
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #2
The guy probably couldn't drive or was babying his car. Second gear in an LS1 is brutal. They have a bigger intake side on the cam, which is where they loose the low-end, and they really start to pick it up around 35-40. That's why they accelerate downtrack so well.

Joe
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Jul 9, 2004
#3
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #3
I don't think he was babying his car because he would downshift into second and every time I would hear him chirp the tires when he does this.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jul 9, 2004
#4
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #4
If you would have continued into 3rd... you'd be watching his lights get farther and farther away from you. in 1st and 2nd our weight, torque and gearing alow us to "hang" with the stock ls1's, but by 3rd gear it is all over as they just continue to keep pulling while ours start to sign off.
 

pwcracer

Founding Member
Jun 13, 2000
347
0
16
Hastings, MN, USA
Jul 9, 2004
#5
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #5
Not in your case canary!

I don't think they would be pulling away from you anytime soon.

I think the C5, LS1 is about 340 HP, and a lot lighter than the LT1 300 hp the late year C4's had. From what I have read and seen, they can run mid 13's with the right driver..
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
Jul 9, 2004
#6
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #6
I'm not debating the fact he would pull away. I knew he would pull away having raced my best friend who has a 2000 Firebird Formula numerous times which has an LS1 but he pulls on me a lot harder than the guy in the C5. That is what I'm saying. My friends formula has lid and exhaust. From all I can tell the C5 at least had exhaust. The C5 is lighter and more aerodynamic than the Formula so I was expecting to get pulled on a lot more but it didn't happen. Maybe my friends car is a freak. He might have been one of the lucky ones to get an LS6 engine. It could also be driver but from a second gear roll that limits driver error some what. He didn't sound slow on shifts and we raced about mid way through third. Who knows?
 

pwcracer

Founding Member
Jun 13, 2000
347
0
16
Hastings, MN, USA
Jul 9, 2004
#7
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #7
C5 not as fast as firebird in 1/4

I found this out from the corvette forum I used to belong to. A LS1 Firebird beat my vette in the 1/4 and I was shocked by this. The guys on the forum said this was quite normal. The birds are better at straight down the track running than a vette. They told me to beat a bird, run him around a twisty track

So i sold my vette and bought this stang. If a 18 year old in a camaro can stomp my vette, what is the point..
 
5

5.7Heaven

New Member
Oct 24, 2003
12
0
0
Jul 9, 2004
#8
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #8
Well, stock C5's are in the 12's and your 95 GT somewhere in 15's. So, he was playin with you.
 

mto502

Founding Member
Sep 18, 2002
357
0
0
Ancaster, Ontario
Jul 9, 2004
#9
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #9
C5's are a low 13 high 12 second car.
 

pwcracer

Founding Member
Jun 13, 2000
347
0
16
Hastings, MN, USA
Jul 9, 2004
#10
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #10
I have never seen a stock C5 run 12's!

That isn't right, they are not in the 12's stock. Like I said the LT1 Vettes, running 6 speeds, are in the 13's on a good day. The Ls1's are only about 40 hp more, that will not run a 12
 

mto502

Founding Member
Sep 18, 2002
357
0
0
Ancaster, Ontario
Jul 9, 2004
#11
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #11
pwcracer said:
That isn't right, they are not in the 12's stock. Like I said the LT1 Vettes, running 6 speeds, are in the 13's on a good day. The Ls1's are only about 40 hp more, that will not run a 12
Click to expand...
I'll take your word for it because I'd rather believe your statement over my own
 

pwcracer

Founding Member
Jun 13, 2000
347
0
16
Hastings, MN, USA
Jul 9, 2004
#12
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #12
C% they can be close to 12..

Found this on the vette forum..

No offence, but 13.98 is kinda slow, unless you were running in very hot weather or higher altitude. I have personally witnessed a 100% bone stock 2.73 99 C5 running 13.3s at 105mph all day long, in 60 degree weather on a track at 700ft altitude.

My own car, a 275hp LT1 f-body, with 3.23s and A4, ran 13.74 at 100mph in 100% bone stock trim too (on a 60 degree day)

And I know many LS1 f-body owners who have run very low 13s, even automatic cars. I have a friend with a 2000 Camaro Z28 which is bone stock and has 2.73 gears and his car has run 13.2 at 105 mph too.

I figured someone on here must've run 12.9s completely stock, even if it was in cold weather.
 
H

HooperLS1

New Member
Jul 9, 2004
2
0
0
Jul 9, 2004
#13
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #13
mto502 said:
C5's are a low 13 high 12 second car.
Click to expand...
You are correct, sir. A buddy of mine has a C5 and he's running 13.17 in 60* weather. He has no mods. I think his gearing is different than mine (3.23) but it's an A4. He gives me a good run, so I put it down to weight difference. But that will change when I get my new verter installed.
 

95GTvert[bv12]

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2001
1,792
0
37
Lake Tahoe, NV
Jul 10, 2004
#14
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #14
My friend just took his z06 to 12.9 and he says thats what most get on the board so an older ls1 vette should run low to mid 13's with a adverage driver
 

mto502

Founding Member
Sep 18, 2002
357
0
0
Ancaster, Ontario
Jul 11, 2004
#15
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #15
HooperLS1 said:
You are correct, sir. A buddy of mine has a C5 and he's running 13.17 in 60* weather. He has no mods. I think his gearing is different than mine (3.23) but it's an A4. He gives me a good run, so I put it down to weight difference. But that will change when I get my new verter installed.
Click to expand...
Hi Al !!
 

mto502

Founding Member
Sep 18, 2002
357
0
0
Ancaster, Ontario
Jul 11, 2004
#16
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #16
95GTvert[bv12] said:
My friend just took his z06 to 12.9 and he says thats what most get on the board so an older ls1 vette should run low to mid 13's with a adverage driver
Click to expand...
I believe a Z06 has about 60 rwhp more than a C5.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Jul 11, 2004
#17
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #17
Maybe it's just the track I go to, or most of the people that go there can drive, but just a few weeks ago, a guy had one of those little Cadillacs down there with the Z06 motor in it. He was running consistent 12.8's, 12.9's. I've seen newer C5's go 12.5 on drag radials (they may have been slicks), and I don't imagine those guys were great drivers.

Not trying to start a pissing match, but LS1's and even lightly modded LT1's can run their asses off.

Joe
 
H

HooperLS1

New Member
Jul 9, 2004
2
0
0
Aug 11, 2004
#18
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #18
mto502 said:
Hi Al !!
Click to expand...
Hi Rick
 
S

Steeda90GT

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2002
714
0
0
Central Jersey
Aug 11, 2004
#19
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #19
I personally ran my cousin's 99 Vette at Englishtown and got 13.4@105mph with little effort, all stock A4.
 

95YellowGTbeasT

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
605
1
0
South Carolina
Aug 11, 2004
#20
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #20
i race a 99 ls1 vette and he only had me by half a car at the end we reaced 0-100, his was an auto though and he was one of those younr rich snobby kids.

Nick
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Megasquirt base tune for 94 5.0
  • wrx757
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
182
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2026
wrx757
W
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
523
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
R
Rcapri - 1980 Capri, bought new by inlaws
  • RCapri
  • Sep 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
795
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
manicmechanic007
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
319
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?