• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

cam for these heads ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter vladasap
  • Start date Start date Nov 5, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

vladasap

Member
Apr 26, 2006
294
0
16
nyc, ny
Nov 5, 2007
#1
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #1
im getting the thumper ported E7's (.500 lift) soon, so i was wondering what would the best performance cam for it ??
So far i have a BUNCH of bolt ons which include a 93 cobra intake

this is a daily driver but i do want something that sounds lopey but wont be too crazy with idle issues but at the same time it will pull hard up top to about 6,000

ideas & suggestions PLEASEEEE


OR should i just get the .600 lift option for extra $100?? really worth it or no?
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Nov 5, 2007
#2
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #2
Go with the extra lift springs, so you don't severely limit cam selection. Even ported, I seem to recall that E7 heads still restrict exhaust flow the most, so something with a split duration that favors the exhaust would probably be ideal.

And man, resize that sig. Max of 650 x 150 for images.
 

vladasap

Member
Apr 26, 2006
294
0
16
nyc, ny
Nov 5, 2007
#3
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #3
even with the .600 lift, i wouldnt encounter any clearance issues?
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Nov 5, 2007
#4
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #4
The .600 lift refers to how much the springs can handle. With a maximum of .500 lift, you pretty much rule out most aftermarket cams as being compatible with the springs without encountering coil bind.
 

vladasap

Member
Apr 26, 2006
294
0
16
nyc, ny
Nov 5, 2007
#5
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #5
edited the sig
*sorry it took so long
 

vladasap

Member
Apr 26, 2006
294
0
16
nyc, ny
Nov 5, 2007
#6
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #6
... well from the cams i've seen so far not too many go over .500

the magnum comp cam seems really decent .500/.500 with advertised power btwn 2500-5800

good match you think??
 
P

porchstang

New Member
Sep 27, 2006
49
1
0
bakersfield
Nov 5, 2007
#7
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #7
vladasap said:
... well from the cams i've seen so far not too many go over .500

the magnum comp cam seems really decent .500/.500 with advertised power btwn 2500-5800

good match you think??
Click to expand...

Get a cam that will make power a little higher with at least 520 lift and get a lobe serperation of about 110 you will love the sound. Are you running long tube headers?
 

earleys94gt

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
1,223
16
49
Ashley, Ohio
Nov 5, 2007
#8
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #8
CompCams just came out with a new line called "Thumpr Cams."

They give off a true old-school' muscle car sound by tightening lobe-seperation.

They also supposedly don't sacrafice drivability and performance.

http://www.compperformancegroupstor...CC&Product_Code=THMPRSBF&Category_Code=Thumpr
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Nov 5, 2007
#9
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #9
good thread. subscribing
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 5, 2007
#10
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #10
I'd not worry about sound at idle
and
Go for a bumpstick that will make you some power :Word:

Any cam is gonna lope at idle

I'd see what Thumper has to say about what works good with his heads

Grady
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Nov 5, 2007
#11
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #11
porchstang said:
Get a cam that will make power a little higher with at least 520 lift and get a lobe serperation of about 110 you will love the sound. Are you running long tube headers?
Click to expand...

I'd not do that without checking piston to valve clearance. IIRC, about the max you can get away with on a stock shortblock is around .512 in order to have enough clearance.
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
Nov 5, 2007
#12
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #12
if i were on a fairly tight budget, (which I assume u r) i would go for the .600 lift springs and a trick flow stage 1 cam , i see some pretty good numbers from it and its fairly cheap..
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Nov 6, 2007
#13
  • Nov 6, 2007
  • #13
I run an X cam with mine
 

vladasap

Member
Apr 26, 2006
294
0
16
nyc, ny
Nov 6, 2007
#14
  • Nov 6, 2007
  • #14
so i CANT get anything bigger than a .512 lift or ill have piston to valve clearance ???

that'd rule out even the smallest cam that comp offers for the thumper heads right??

appreciate all the input so far !!!!!
 

vladasap

Member
Apr 26, 2006
294
0
16
nyc, ny
Nov 6, 2007
#15
  • Nov 6, 2007
  • #15
btw hows the x-cam ?? sound and drivability?
any numbers for that?? either track times or dyno

i am really curious about it .. btw u didnt need to mod anything to use the X-cam??
 

vladasap

Member
Apr 26, 2006
294
0
16
nyc, ny
Nov 7, 2007
#16
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #16
GRADY
any personal suggestions for those heads?

*ur like a god on the 94-95's forums so id appreciate ur opinion
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Nov 7, 2007
#17
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #17
the x is a bit big for a driver by somes perspective, not by mine. the sound is awesome for a straight spec cam with wide seperation. works really well for me starts to make power at 25/2800 rpm range and i shift at 6,800 pulls hard all the way up. no numbers its my daily driver i just changed my springs on heads
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Nov 7, 2007
#18
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #18
Vladasap, how did you get a trap speed of 104mph with only 235rwhp? I would have expected about 99-100 at best.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 7, 2007
#19
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #19
vladasap said:
GRADY
any personal suggestions for those heads?

*ur like a god on the 94-95's forums so id appreciate ur opinion
Click to expand...

I really don't know a lot about cams other than just general info

I even enlisted a hired gun for cam choice with my little GT

Here are a few thoughts that may or may not help

The OEM iron heads have poor exhaust efficiency
and
The newer after market heads do not
thus
I feel it is not always good to use new tech cams with old tech heads

In a nutshell ...
a cam can be used to bolster the poor e flow in those old iron heads

That is the reason I felt you should get with Thumper and see what he
has got to say

I'm sure this has all been dealt with here if you want to try and find
it with a search

Again ... Please let me stress this point

I know all about wanting to sound ......
bad azz at a stop light
with cam lope and all that

A nasty lope doesn't always mean a car that will make good power
so
Even the smallest cam is gonna lope some
so
Don't fret over that a whole lot

I actually do get a bit frustrated from all the attention it draws when me
and the little woman go out for a cruise around town

anyway .......

I do feel you can learn from other peeps experiences :Word:

I don't know how much power you are expecting from this combo

Here are a few iron headed based combos for you to consider

Grady

 

vladasap

Member
Apr 26, 2006
294
0
16
nyc, ny
Nov 7, 2007
#20
  • Nov 7, 2007
  • #20
well i have a 93 cobra intake to go with those heads
imma call thumper and see what they say =)

anyways...to tell you the truth i was stunned to trap 104
i was debating whether id brake a 100 but.... hey the 4.10s really did their work !
but what i was really disappointed by was the 14.01
dunt mean to sound cocky but i was almost positive i was in the 13's but i guess i was wrong - the issue was the tires tho- i ran on really really bold summitomos (those tires feel like plastic btw - deff dont suggest them but i was using them cause i got them with the rims)

anyways ill keep you guys updated once the H/C project nears (only a few weeks away)

***BTW - i got an offer for $400 - ported E7's 196/152 / bigger valves / .600 comp cam springs and this is what throws me off - 1.5 ratio rockers ??? wtf is that all about?? the guy tells me its to avoid piston-valve clearance issues
they look really clean

OR

bare but cleaned up GT40's for $200 (what EXACTLY would i need to get to complete them & how much would it run me?? springs, rockers......., ???


Please help me decide
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
861
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
G
Anyone Extrude Hone or Flow Bench Speed Pro Heads?
  • giddyup306v1.1
  • Mar 1, 2025
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
10
Views
630
Fox Engine Swaparoo Mar 29, 2026
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?