• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Cam Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter sgarrelts01
  • Start date Start date Dec 14, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

sgarrelts01

New Member
Apr 26, 2009
133
0
0
Niles, Michigan
Dec 14, 2009
#1
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #1
Since i am going to a Carb set up, what about the cam. I see on CompCam website they have Carb Roller cams and EFI. What is the difference.

Is their select few cams i can use. What would happen if i put a EFI cam in a carb set up.

I don't want to do custom right now. But i was a cam with a very aggressive idle that will help me get to 350-400hp at the rear wheels.


Also a question about the Ford Cams,

What ford cam packs the most power and aggressive idle

If the cams go in order wouldn't the X or Z cam be the biggest

Are they capable of being used with a carb set up.
 

Tanus

New Member
Dec 11, 2009
847
1
0
A to the Z
Dec 14, 2009
#2
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #2
X or Z will work fine with a carb, ive had both, specs are close but the Z definatly likes a bigger gear ratio( 3.73 at least, preferably 4.10) and higher RPMs like 3,500-6,500. Both idle pretty smooth
 

Tanus

New Member
Dec 11, 2009
847
1
0
A to the Z
Dec 14, 2009
#3
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #3
oh yeah, carbs suck, if you plan to drive on the street your wallet will hate you.
 
S

sgarrelts01

New Member
Apr 26, 2009
133
0
0
Niles, Michigan
Dec 14, 2009
#4
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #4
Tanus said:
oh yeah, carbs suck, if you plan to drive on the street your wallet will hate you.
Click to expand...

Wallet already hates me.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 14, 2009
#5
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #5
i think the EFI tag has to do with the valve timing and overlap and the way some computers are programmed. some computers like to squirt the fuel on the back of the intake valve when it is closed. in that case, when there is a good bit of overlap, some of the fuel will go out with the exhaust before it is ignited, which can cause the computer to think that there is a problem.

going the other way (using an EFI cam in a carbed setup) you should not have that problem.

at least, that is my understanding ... if i am way off base here, i hope someone will chime in and set me straight.

i have to ask though ... why go carbed?
 
S

sgarrelts01

New Member
Apr 26, 2009
133
0
0
Niles, Michigan
Dec 14, 2009
#6
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #6
BlackVert said:
i think the EFI tag has to do with the valve timing and overlap and the way some computers are programmed. some computers like to squirt the fuel on the back of the intake valve when it is closed. in that case, when there is a good bit of overlap, some of the fuel will go out with the exhaust before it is ignited, which can cause the computer to think that there is a problem.

going the other way (using an EFI cam in a carbed setup) you should not have that problem.

at least, that is my understanding ... if i am way off base here, i hope someone will chime in and set me straight.

i have to ask though ... why go carbed?
Click to expand...

Main reason, its going to save me about 1000. I need a new intake anyway. New MAF, New injectors, and so on.

So using a EFI cam i should be fine in a carb set up.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 14, 2009
#7
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #7
mind you, i'm not trying to change your mind or anything, but ...

- a decent carb is not cheap either
- you will also need to do some fuel system work ... pump, pickup, ...
- then there is the distributor/ignition system to be addressed as well

i researched going carb for my 410 and decided that what money i might save would not be worth the headaches of the conversion and lack of tunability.

i'm showing my age here, but back in the day, a carb that was happy in the summer months would be less happy in the winter months unless you tweaked it, and vice-versa.

and while a carbed setup can make great power in that WOT high rpm application, it's generally worse than an EFI setup for the variable rpm (ie - street) application, from both the power/torque perspective and the fuel efficiency perspective.

are you building a race car or one for the street? and do you have to worry about passing emissions for this car?

just some thoughts, not a sermon ...
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 14, 2009
#8
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #8
Carbs work ok. They start to get cheaper when you get up above the 500hp range, when one would otherwise have to start buying expensive injectors and bigger everything. Other than that, the fuel injection parts have gotten so cheap there really is no advantage. And you can get a Road Demon carb for not a whole lot of money. They aren't the best, but totally decent for the street.

Kurt
 
S

sgarrelts01

New Member
Apr 26, 2009
133
0
0
Niles, Michigan
Dec 14, 2009
#9
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #9
BlackVert said:
mind you, i'm not trying to change your mind or anything, but ...

- a decent carb is not cheap either
- you will also need to do some fuel system work ... pump, pickup, ...
- then there is the distributor/ignition system to be addressed as well

i researched going carb for my 410 and decided that what money i might save would not be worth the headaches of the conversion and lack of tunability.

i'm showing my age here, but back in the day, a carb that was happy in the summer months would be less happy in the winter months unless you tweaked it, and vice-versa.

and while a carbed setup can make great power in that WOT high rpm application, it's generally worse than an EFI setup for the variable rpm (ie - street) application, from both the power/torque perspective and the fuel efficiency perspective.

are you building a race car or one for the street? and do you have to worry about passing emissions for this car?

just some thoughts, not a sermon ...
Click to expand...

Won't be driving it past September.

Also i was told for the fuel that i could just get a regulator and adjust the psi down to what it needs to be.

Have a brand new MSD dizzy in a box that im just going to take back an exchange for one so i can use carb.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 14, 2009
#10
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #10
sgarrelts01 said:
Also i was told for the fuel that i could just get a regulator and adjust the psi down to what it needs to be.
Click to expand...
you might double check this ... you are going from 40psi down to 6-7 psi. that's a big difference.

is passing emissions an issue for you?

so this is a warm weather car ... race only or street?

also, what mods are you planning?
 
C

corey97svt

New Member
Aug 28, 2009
34
0
0
Knoxville, TN
Dec 14, 2009
#11
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #11
I have been through all types of **** trying to run a return style regulator and cut 40 down to 6. Sumped gas tank is a must. Stay FI if all possible !!! For your resale values sake. I would much rather have streetability over a couple of extra horses on the top end.
 
S

sgarrelts01

New Member
Apr 26, 2009
133
0
0
Niles, Michigan
Dec 14, 2009
#12
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #12
BlackVert said:
you might double check this ... you are going from 40psi down to 6-7 psi. that's a big difference.

is passing emissions an issue for you?

so this is a warm weather car ... race only or street?

also, what mods are you planning?
Click to expand...

I live in Michigan so no emissions.

Street/strip

i am either doing AFR 185 or 205 heads, Its already a 331 stroker, doing the Eddy Air Gap with a most likely holley 750. Going to go 4.10 gears, it has aluminum drive shaft. Cam at this point is unknown. Just trying to find one so my car will rumble but match the intakes rpm range.

and if i have to change the tank or anything like that ill just go to a fuel cell. and run new lines.
 

LethalInjection

Founding Member
Jul 26, 2002
217
0
17
Arkansas
Dec 14, 2009
#13
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #13
EFI cam's generally have a wider lobe separation angle. The "carb" cams can run tighter lsa's without worrying about the eec freaking out. They are just more aggressive. You CAN run them in EFI applications, but you have oftentimes have to tune the eec to behave with the tighter lsa and greater overlap. The manufacturers just list them that way so ppl don't freak out if they pay a bunch of money for a cam and it idles all weird. Alot of ppl will blame it on the cam, gripe, and say bad things about it then instead of figuring out how to tune their eec to deal with it. They may not even know they need to do this. Not good advertisement and alot more complaints to deal with.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 14, 2009
#14
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #14
EFI cam may also suggest the HO firing order. The firing order really isn't an issue as long as you know what it is, and run your spark plug wires accordingly.

There is no chance of effectively getting that fuel injection fuel pump to work with a carb. You're going to have to pull the gas tank, and put a pickup tube in there, and wire in a different pressure fuel pump. Or sump the tank.

Kurt
 
S

sgarrelts01

New Member
Apr 26, 2009
133
0
0
Niles, Michigan
Dec 14, 2009
#15
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #15
revhead347 said:
EFI cam may also suggest the HO firing order. The firing order really isn't an issue as long as you know what it is, and run your spark plug wires accordingly.

There is no chance of effectively getting that fuel injection fuel pump to work with a carb. You're going to have to pull the gas tank, and put a pickup tube in there, and wire in a different pressure fuel pump. Or sump the tank.

Kurt
Click to expand...

What is sumping the tank.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 14, 2009
#16
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #16
It's cutting a hole in the bottom of the fuel tank, and welding in fittings for fuel to come out of. So the fuel is extracted from the bottom of the tank, instead of being taken out of the top.

Kurt
 
S

sgarrelts01

New Member
Apr 26, 2009
133
0
0
Niles, Michigan
Dec 14, 2009
#17
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #17
revhead347 said:
It's cutting a hole in the bottom of the fuel tank, and welding in fittings for fuel to come out of. So the fuel is extracted from the bottom of the tank, instead of being taken out of the top.

Kurt
Click to expand...

So then i take it i would have to get a external fuel pump, and the brand new trick flow one that is in my take is pointless
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Dec 14, 2009
#18
  • Dec 14, 2009
  • #18
sgarrelts01 said:
So then i take it i would have to get a external fuel pump, and the brand new trick flow one that is in my take is pointless
Click to expand...

Either way, the one in your tank can not be reused.

Kurt
 
S

sgarrelts01

New Member
Apr 26, 2009
133
0
0
Niles, Michigan
Dec 15, 2009
#19
  • Dec 15, 2009
  • #19
revhead347 said:
Either way, the one in your tank can not be reused.

Kurt
Click to expand...

that sucks, less then 10 miles on it. Oh well
 

LethalInjection

Founding Member
Jul 26, 2002
217
0
17
Arkansas
Dec 15, 2009
#20
  • Dec 15, 2009
  • #20
The fuel pump for the sequential fuel injection in these cars is a higher pressure lower volume pump. Carb setups run MUCH less pressure, but are rated at relatively high volumes. The pump you have now is designed to supply 39+ psi at a certain flowrate. The carb pumps are designed to run below 10.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
515
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
643
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Wednesday at 10:27 PM
General karthief
J
Fox Cam swap gone wrong??
  • Jimmer009
  • Apr 21, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
576
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2025
Jimmer009
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
655
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
232
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?