• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Cam, rear gear and torque converter relationship?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 69PaleHorse
  • Start date Start date Aug 18, 2004

69PaleHorse

Member
Feb 3, 2004
264
0
16
Ventura County, CA
Aug 18, 2004
#1
  • Aug 18, 2004
  • #1
I've noticed a few threads requesting suggestions on torque converters, and rather than hi-jack those threads with this question, I thought I'd pose it here.

What exactly is the relationship between the cam, the rear gear and the torque converter?

I am going to assume that the cam helps to determine the powerband, therefore, the torque converter should be spec'd to work with that. But I'm not sure I understand the rear gear aspect.

The reason I ask all of this, is because I will be putting in my new B&M Street and Strip C4 soon, and it will need a torque converter. The cam swap will be done in the near future as well (probably along with the EFI swap) but I doubt my 3.00 gearing in the back will change...so what do I need to know here? What suggestions do y'all have?

Thanks!
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Aug 19, 2004
#2
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #2
It all is geared to get you in your powerband faster. A well built engine is built around a specific RPM (ie, built to make power from 2000-6000 rpm, or 4000-8000, etc). The heads, carb, cam, intake, and even displacement will all reflect this (if you do it right... this is why parts matching is important, why pairing a stock cam with AFR heads isn't a great use of money, why a huge cam with stock intake and heads is a massive waste of time, etc). The cam is probably the most influential part as far as power band goes. When you buy a cam, make sure all the parts (Engine and throughout the drivetrain) are matched to it (usually cams are rated, like above, in power ranges. if you match this to your intake and then pick carbs and heads according to mathematical rules/common sense, you should be good to go).

A torque converter, in simplest terms, defines the beginning of your powerband. A 2k stall converter engages at roughly 2000 rpm, depending on the motor. This is great if you have the aforementioned 2000-6000 rpm motor, because you'll be making big power instantly. If you had a stock converter (around 1500 rpm, i think), you'd have about 500 rpm of mediocre power before getting to the good stuff.

Rear gears do something very similar. They allow an engine to rev faster, especially off the line. This has the same effect... it can get you into your power band faster. 2.8 rear gears won't work in a high rpm/high hp application, simply because it'll take years for you to rev to those high rpms. But plug in some 3.73s and you're there in no time, and they'll help you stay there.

Sorry for the book, but yeah.
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Aug 19, 2004
#3
  • Aug 19, 2004
  • #3
you could do that

SadbutTrue said:
The cam is probably the most influential part as far as power band goes. When you buy a cam, make sure all the parts (Engine and throughout the drivetrain) are matched to it
Click to expand...

or you could have a custom grind cam done up after you have flowed your heads and matched a carb to your application.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Help
  • OnisimusD
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
426
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 14, 2025
OnisimusD
O
D
96 get convertible-sell or part out?
  • DTCstang
  • May 17, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
5
Views
144
What is it Worth?!?!? May 18, 2026
nickyb
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread 93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2025
Scrapla347
J
Hello all, I have returned from a hiatus... Update and Questions
  • JackH
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
333
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 15, 2025
JackH
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?