• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Cams sound clip from a local guys GT.

  • Thread starter Thread starter CaliLifeStyle
  • Start date Start date Jul 13, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
41
Oxnard, CA
Jul 13, 2005
#1
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #1
http://joez.info/joe_stang_wh_memberpage/videos/joe_stangs_01_NA_mod2v.wmv

Crower Stage3 cams, BBK LTs and a Mac O/R Pro Chamber. This is California too. So for all you Cali Sucks people check it out.
 

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
41
Oxnard, CA
Jul 13, 2005
#2
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #2
If the link doesn't work. Use this.

http://s5.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=1ZS1QWL4ONHKJ16OXY76MX9SOH
 
P

pimpstang18

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
43
0
0
FL
Jul 13, 2005
#3
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #3
sounds sick! are cams the only engine internal mod you did? if so was it worth the price and time?
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
53
south jersey
Jul 13, 2005
#4
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #4
did he have the logtubes installed before the dyno? if so 50hp from cams is insane. Sounds great too..very lopey.
 
9

97gtblue

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
283
0
0
pensacola,florida
Jul 13, 2005
#5
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #5
i love it when a car lopes when it idleing, sounds good that what i need
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
48
StateCollege PA
community.webshots.com
Jul 13, 2005
#6
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #6
stage 3 cam would need valve springs don't they?
 
F

FalconGuy016

New Member
Oct 26, 2004
437
1
0
Northern VA
Jul 13, 2005
#7
  • Jul 13, 2005
  • #7
Wow 50HP....
 

Redfire03GT

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
395
0
0
46
Newark, CA.
Jul 14, 2005
#8
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #8
CaliLifeStyle said:
http://joez.info/joe_stang_wh_memberpage/videos/joe_stangs_01_NA_mod2v.wmv

Crower Stage3 cams, BBK LTs and a Mac O/R Pro Chamber. This is California too. So for all you Cali Sucks people check it out.
Click to expand...

That's all fine and dandy about him being from California. But realistically, is he going to pass smog with those cams? Something tells me... no. Unless he has a 'way' around it.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jul 14, 2005
#9
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #9
They really hurt below 4100RPM tho...
 

96WhiteNight

New Member
May 11, 2004
303
0
0
43
Carlisle, PA
Jul 14, 2005
#10
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #10
Sounds good
 

V_Eight

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
617
1
0
40
ATL
Jul 14, 2005
#11
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #11
Sounds great idling, but needs more exhaust noise.
 

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
41
Oxnard, CA
Jul 14, 2005
#12
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #12
droptopponynj said:
did he have the logtubes installed before the dyno? if so 50hp from cams is insane. Sounds great too..very lopey.
Click to expand...

I don't know. I'll have to ask him. But I have heard of people getting about 40hp from cams. So 50hp from a Stage 3 type cam sounds resonable.

mity2 said:
stage 3 cam would need valve springs don't they?
Click to expand...

More than likely. I don't know much about Crower cams.
 

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
41
Oxnard, CA
Jul 14, 2005
#13
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #13
Info on Crower Cams.

http://www.crower.com/cat/domestic/ford/mustang_camshafts.shtml
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jul 14, 2005
#14
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #14
Sounds awesome but it's wasted money IMO.

There was a severe loss of low end torque, which you would use a lot on the street for high end hp which you won't use as much.

Here's a screenshot I grabbed from the video. He gained a small ammount of torque which is the only true measure of how much work and engien can do, but it shifted the torque delivery up by 500-1000 rpm.

Now those cams with a KB blower might be interesting indeed. A KB would carry the bottom end torque up significantly and add to the top end.
 

Attachments

  • dyno.webp
    8.7 KB · Views: 189

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
41
Oxnard, CA
Jul 14, 2005
#15
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #15
tjm73 said:
Sounds awesome but it's wasted money IMO.

There was a severe loss of low end torque, which you would use a lot on the street for high end hp which you won't use as much.

Here's a screenshot I grabbed from the video. He gained a small ammount of torque which is the only true measure of how much work and engien can do, but it shifted the torque delivery up by 500-1000 rpm.

Now those cams with a KB blower might be interesting indeed. A KB would carry the bottom end torque up significantly and add to the top end.
Click to expand...


He is aiming more at the quarter mile track then the street. He needs that high rpm power. His goal is to run mid 11's NA.

 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jul 14, 2005
#16
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #16
CaliLifeStyle said:
He is aiming more at the quarter mile track then the street. He needs that high rpm power. His goal is to run mid 11's NA.
Click to expand...

Oh. That changes things a lot. That power delivery will be perfect for that goal. Easier to launch and more power to run out the back door.
 
4

4.6guru

New Member
Apr 15, 2005
36
0
0
Jul 14, 2005
#17
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #17
California doesn't suck if you do everything ILLEGALLY.
 

boomshack

New Member
Jun 4, 2004
274
0
0
Southern Cali
Jul 14, 2005
#18
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #18
4.6guru said:
California doesn't suck if you do everything ILLEGALLY.
Click to expand...

Hells Yeah!
 

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
41
Oxnard, CA
Jul 14, 2005
#19
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #19
That dyno was done after cams and port/polished heads were installed.

Stage 3 cams + P&P heads = 50rwhp.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
53
south jersey
Jul 14, 2005
#20
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • #20
seems like thats the kind off set up that would benefit from a forged high reving short block.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
P
Thoughts on this odd (smog legal) combo?
  • PJV9126
  • Feb 8, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2023
91AOD5.0LX
K
Clicking sound From Top of Engine (VIDEO INCLUDED)
  • K7Stang
  • May 31, 2019
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 31, 2019
04Turbo4v
M
New guy here from SE Pa
  • magnum517
  • Feb 23, 2020
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Mar 8, 2020
magnum517
M
S
(HelpPlease)Weird slapping noise under valve cover after Cam Install+Rebuild, 2001 SVT Cobra Forged Rebuilt.
  • SVT_Yossii
  • Apr 24, 2019
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 9, 2019
LaserSVT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?