• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Can someone explain altitude change to me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KillaKev702
  • Start date Start date Jun 26, 2010

KillaKev702

New Member
Mar 26, 2009
28
0
1
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 26, 2010
#1
  • Jun 26, 2010
  • #1
Ok so I went to "The Strip" tonight at LVMS, which is at 2,100 feet above sea level where I ran a best time of 15.0 at 95 mph . I was talking to a guy in the pits and he said that it's the altitude change, thats why I was running slower than used to. Back in VA at Richmond Dragway, which is at 74 feet above sea level I ran a best of 14.2 at 100 mph .
So here is my question, is something wrong with my car or is it altitude? since my old best time I've added 3.90s, FRPP c springs, and an MGW. Also if it is altitude what causes this change?
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Jun 26, 2010
#2
  • Jun 26, 2010
  • #2
Obviously the more air an engine is able to suck into its chambers, the better it performs. The higher up you go in elevation, the air becomes less and less dense. In other words, the higher up you go, the air gets less and less (as simply as I can put it). With less air, you get less performance.

Have you ever heard about how mountain climbers need to wear oxygen masks? Its because the amount of oxygen decreases the higher up you go. Cars need oxygen too
 

Stumbaugh

Member
May 13, 2010
903
13
19
Russellville, Ar
Jun 26, 2010
#3
  • Jun 26, 2010
  • #3
Nightfire said:
Obviously the more air an engine is able to suck into its chambers, the better it performs. The higher up you go in elevation, the air becomes less and less dense. In other words, the higher up you go, the air gets less and less (as simply as I can put it). With less air, you get less performance.

Have you ever heard about how mountain climbers need to wear oxygen masks? Its because the amount of oxygen decreases the higher up you go. Cars need oxygen too
Click to expand...

Very well said my friend. Just like he said, Higher up you go, the less air there is. Car's need air to perform good.
 

N8Dogg98

15 Year Member
Apr 4, 2005
3,872
238
184
MN
Jun 26, 2010
#4
  • Jun 26, 2010
  • #4
The atmospheric pressure drop is what causes the air to be less dense. So lets suppose your car made 300 HP at sea level. Average sea level pressure is 14.7 psi, now if you were to take your car to 10,000 feet above sea level the average pressure is approximately 10.1 psi. That means your car would make 300*(10.1/14.7) = 206 HP at 10,000 ft above sea level (assuming temperature and humidity were the same).

It's the same concept with forced induction. That same car at sea level with 10 PSI of boost would make 300*((10+14.7)/14.7) = 504 HP
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Jun 26, 2010
#5
  • Jun 26, 2010
  • #5
There are websites available that will calculate your da and "correct" your times.
 

KillaKev702

New Member
Mar 26, 2009
28
0
1
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 26, 2010
#6
  • Jun 26, 2010
  • #6
Nightfire said:
Have you ever heard about how mountain climbers need to wear oxygen masks? Its because the amount of oxygen decreases the higher up you go. Cars need oxygen too
Click to expand...

ok that makes sense but do my times make sense? should I be running that much slower from a 2000 ft elevation change? also I didnt mention before that my 60 ft times were pretty much the same as usual if that helps.
 

Dark04GT

10 Year Member
Apr 27, 2008
758
62
59
NC
Jun 26, 2010
#7
  • Jun 26, 2010
  • #7
KillaKev702 said:
ok that makes sense but do my times make sense? should I be running that much slower from a 2000 ft elevation change? also I didnt mention before that my 60 ft times were pretty much the same as usual if that helps.
Click to expand...

Your times make sense. I would expect you to run high 14's at that altitude if you had a run just like your 14.2. At 2000 ft your are running at an atmospheric pressure of 13.6 psi versus the sea level 14.7 psi. You lost power over the entire range of RPM's because less air = less boom. Roughly you lost about 13-14 peak hp with that altitude.
 

KillaKev702

New Member
Mar 26, 2009
28
0
1
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 26, 2010
#8
  • Jun 26, 2010
  • #8
d98gt said:
There are websites available that will calculate your da and "correct" your times.
Click to expand...

I did check somne of them out and thanks to those I've stopped worrying about something being wrong with my car. According to this calculator ( DA Calculator - Density Altitude Calculator - DragTimes.com ) my car would be running 14.102 @ 102.019 MPH @ sea level.
I'm not liking this higher altitude, now I feel like I'm gonna be dumping a bunch more money in my car to get better ETs oh well...
 
B

Barnaby

Founding Member
Dec 2, 1999
596
0
0
Albuquerque, NM
Jun 26, 2010
#9
  • Jun 26, 2010
  • #9
I always considered Las Vegas to be low altitude. Last time I ran here the DA was 8800ft.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jun 26, 2010
#10
  • Jun 26, 2010
  • #10
Adjusting for DA is a funny thing. Yes, you lost power, but I would be surprised if you really ran as fast as that website claims you could. It says my 88 is a consistent high 11 second car at sea level, and it really isn't!

That assumes you have perfect traction and could perfectly plant the extra power if you had it. And even at sea level, it i rare for the temperatures to really be at standard conditions, of 59*F and 0% humidity.
 
R

ran260gt

New Member
Sep 7, 2005
365
0
0
Jun 27, 2010
#11
  • Jun 27, 2010
  • #11
DA is one of the reasons why if you get a new mod you should go to the track a few times to see if you got any HP or faster from that mod !

To many morons get a mod like a T/B or plenum or pulleys or what ever, then run one time at a track, run a slower time then before the new mod, and then go on a forum and bash the said mod for being a waste of money and makes your car slower, thats why when you get a new mod you have to run at the track a few times before posting an opinion !

DA is funny like that, you can run a 13.0 on friday and a 13.4 the next friday !
 

d98gt

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
4,505
59
204
SE Texas
Jun 27, 2010
#12
  • Jun 27, 2010
  • #12
bhuff30 said:
Adjusting for DA is a funny thing.
And even at sea level, it i rare for the temperatures to really be at standard conditions, of 59*F and 0% humidity.
Click to expand...

We get lucky to get negative da here in the winter at HRP That is why running at the track during our summers here is pointless to some; the car can be half a second slower.
 

3ponyshow

Founding Member
Jun 26, 2002
319
1
18
Las Vegas
Jun 27, 2010
#13
  • Jun 27, 2010
  • #13
KillaKev702 said:
I did check somne of them out and thanks to those I've stopped worrying about something being wrong with my car. According to this calculator ( DA Calculator - Density Altitude Calculator - DragTimes.com ) my car would be running 14.102 @ 102.019 MPH @ sea level.
I'm not liking this higher altitude, now I feel like I'm gonna be dumping a bunch more money in my car to get better ETs oh well...
Click to expand...

I know what you mean about the frustration. Moving here from NY with it's almost sea level tracks and cooler air made a huge difference in performance. Not only do we have the disadvantage of altitude over most other tracks, but also the extreme heat which has just as much of a negative affect. Don't let it discourage you. Everyone you line up against is in the same position. When you see other's times from other places, just remember you're not comparing apples to apples. Performance mods here are still mods.
 

KillaKev702

New Member
Mar 26, 2009
28
0
1
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 27, 2010
#14
  • Jun 27, 2010
  • #14
3ponyshow said:
I know what you mean about the frustration. Moving here from NY with it's almost sea level tracks and cooler air made a huge difference in performance. Not only do we have the disadvantage of altitude over most other tracks, but also the extreme heat which has just as much of a negative affect. Don't let it discourage you. Everyone you line up against is in the same position. When you see other's times from other places, just remember you're not comparing apples to apples. Performance mods here are still mods.
Click to expand...

Oh I know what you mean by the heat, it was about 95 degrees when I ran. I never just never thought that it could be this much of a difference compared to VA. Also your right about the other cars, I was still beating Z28's and s/c cobalts so I'm happy considering I'm pretty much stock except for gears and exhaust.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Nitrous Update 2013 GT 5.0 Manual
  • MarineDeuce
  • Jun 20, 2019
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Jun 26, 2019
MarineDeuce
Engine Can yall help me add another 100HP?
  • silverlx50
  • Dec 1, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 1, 2020
CHig84
C
T
Forced Induction Vortech Pulley Question (Long Read)
  • tinker451
  • Feb 23, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 23, 2020
tinker451
T
G
How much can a A4LD take before it breaks?
  • GOvert
  • Jul 25, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2019
Charlie Cheap
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?