• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

cant decide which throttlebody to go with

  • Thread starter Thread starter smilts
  • Start date Start date Jan 20, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

smilts

Member
Jun 18, 2011
104
0
16
Roaring Springs Tx
Jan 20, 2012
#1
  • Jan 20, 2012
  • #1
im trying to decide whether to use my old throttle body and a adapter elbow on my gt40 intake. or to just go with a fox style throttle body. ive actualy found a fox style tb and egr spacer for $50. i have everything else needed off of some random intake i had laying around, including a fox style wire harness. so it would be a easy swap and i wouldnt have to buy anything but the TB and egr spacer. or i could just buy the adapter elbow for around the same amount. the only real advantage that i know of with the fox style TB is my cold air hooks up to it without having to modify it. are there any disadvantages? or advantages ive missed?
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 20, 2012
#2
  • Jan 20, 2012
  • #2
Some say the FOX style TB is better for idle and throttle response. I wouldn't know I ran the SN style on my 94. You could always trim your cold air to fit the SN95 style. You will need the FOX throttle cable among the other items you mentioned. Seem like a hassle to me. I'd cut the cold air to fit your current set up but that's me.
 

smilts

Member
Jun 18, 2011
104
0
16
Roaring Springs Tx
Jan 20, 2012
#3
  • Jan 20, 2012
  • #3
im leaning towards the fox, if theres no down sides. only because other than a throttle cable i have everything already. i have to either buy a throttle body and spacer, or a elbow adapter. and its actualy a bit more for the elbow adapter. i dont know that i see the hassle though, not trying to argue. just wondering if you seeing something ive missed?
 
T

turbogt

Member
May 1, 2003
723
16
19
Montana
Jan 20, 2012
#4
  • Jan 20, 2012
  • #4
The fox gives you many more options in the end..
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 20, 2012
#5
  • Jan 20, 2012
  • #5
The fox body throttle body has a tendancy to jamb by design, and when the cable gets old, it has a tendancy to fall off. It does give you better valve cover clearance though. You'll also need a fox style egr if you using one.

kurt
 

smilts

Member
Jun 18, 2011
104
0
16
Roaring Springs Tx
Jan 20, 2012
#6
  • Jan 20, 2012
  • #6
Thank you I didnt know that about the jamming. the cable I picked up is not brand new but fairly new and seems in good shape. I have the EGR for the fox at home. I think Im going to go with the fox, I can always buy a adapter later if i dont like it.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Jan 20, 2012
#7
  • Jan 20, 2012
  • #7
I had to run a spacer on the side of my intake to push the TB out more so that it would clear the fuel rails on my fox TB set up, other then that its been great and I like it a lot more, much more cleaner look and I do think there is a better throttle response. I have a brand new cable on it so it should be good for a long time
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 21, 2012
#8
  • Jan 21, 2012
  • #8
If you have a new cable and good quality throttle body it probably won't be an issue. That was the part I hated about the 2 foxbodies I owned, the damn cheap throttle body design. That was probably the biggest design improvement I saw in the SN.

Kurt
 

smilts

Member
Jun 18, 2011
104
0
16
Roaring Springs Tx
Jan 21, 2012
#9
  • Jan 21, 2012
  • #9
I might go ahead and buy a brand new throttle cable. should I get any particular throttle body i should look for to avoid the issues you had. and should I get a spacer or will the EGR spacer do the trick to clear the full rails?
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Jan 21, 2012
#10
  • Jan 21, 2012
  • #10
the EGR spacer will push you out far enough to clear the rails, Forgot to mention I have no EGR on mine. Pretty much everyone that does the fox swap uses Accufab, thats the main reason we do switch just so we can use those TB. There are other companies out there but avoid the chepo ones
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 21, 2012
#11
  • Jan 21, 2012
  • #11
Accufabs are the best, but very pricey. Steer clear of the Chinese ones, like Professional Products. I've had every brand except Accufab, and they all have the jamming problem. It's inherent with the original Ford design. I think all the quality American made ones will work about the same; BBK, Edelbrock, Trick Flow, etc. A lot of people go crazy about the Accufab because diameter for diameter it outflows the competitors. The honest truth is that if it is sized appropriately, then the throttle body is not a restriction anyway. My BBK 70mm flows plenty for my 450hp engine. I would definately buy a new throttle cable. That stupid clip that grabs the the throttle linkage wears out over time, and because a nusiance when it falls off.

Kurt
 

smilts

Member
Jun 18, 2011
104
0
16
Roaring Springs Tx
Jan 21, 2012
#12
  • Jan 21, 2012
  • #12
While Im asking about throttle bodies. should I go with a larger than stock mm TB? I'm not sure with what I'm running that I need to. I'm only running gt40 heads, TFS I guess stage one cam, gt40 intake and a cold air.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 21, 2012
#13
  • Jan 21, 2012
  • #13
65mm aftermarket should work great on that. The stock one is a little on the small side, and there is no disadvantage to going with a bigger one.

Kurt
 

smilts

Member
Jun 18, 2011
104
0
16
Roaring Springs Tx
Jan 21, 2012
#14
  • Jan 21, 2012
  • #14
thnx for all the tips fellas. should be ordering the parts monday.

One more question. Are the stock sn95 throttle body and the stock fox style throttle body the same size? or is the stock fox smaller? I have a throttle body and egr spacer at the house that came on as intake a buddy gave me, but the throttle body looks awefull small.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 21, 2012
#15
  • Jan 21, 2012
  • #15
The stock fox is smaller, but I can't remember the exact dimensions.

Kurt
 

smilts

Member
Jun 18, 2011
104
0
16
Roaring Springs Tx
Jan 21, 2012
#16
  • Jan 21, 2012
  • #16
Oh ok then I'm betting a I have a stock fox intake throttle body and EGR spacer.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Jan 28, 2012
#17
  • Jan 28, 2012
  • #17
smilts said:
One more question. Are the stock sn95 throttle body and the stock fox style throttle body the same size?
Click to expand...

Yes. Both are 60mm.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,028
21,205
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 28, 2012
#18
  • Jan 28, 2012
  • #18
I would be leery of $50 TB and spacer deals. Been there... That was money down the drain for a TB that didn't work for the LAST dude that owned it.

For me anymore, it's Accufab for nothing. I'm getting ready to go to an 80 mm in the near future here and I'll be going with another Accufab.

That's not to say that there aren't other TBs out there that are good. I know lots of folks who have run Edel, BBK, and couple others and they work flawlessly. In my case, I've never had to return an Accufab so I stick with those. You couldn't pay me to run a PP... particularly a used one.
 
R

redsn95gt

Member
Aug 5, 2010
143
0
16
Jan 30, 2012
#19
  • Jan 30, 2012
  • #19
I run a BBK 70mm and its not bad. I'm not too keen on some of their other products (the cold air is a pos!) but the TB seems to be alright. I'd probably do an accufab if I was to do an 80mm later.
 

smilts

Member
Jun 18, 2011
104
0
16
Roaring Springs Tx
Feb 8, 2012
#20
  • Feb 8, 2012
  • #20
Ended up for now going with the elbow adapter and modified the cold air. later will be switching to the fox style setup with better everything.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
677
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
551
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Sick of stock TB and EGR spacer...
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
673
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 19, 2024
General karthief
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
716
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?