• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Carborator or timing issue?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bdepedro
  • Start date Start date Apr 16, 2012

bdepedro

Member
Nov 6, 2006
362
2
19
Outer Banks, NC
Apr 16, 2012
#1
  • Apr 16, 2012
  • #1
I'm having some tuning issues and I can't figure out if it's a timing or carb adjustment issue. The car runs fine through the primary range and even when the secondaries open as long as it's gradual. If I get on it fairly hard I get a lot of pinging and smoke. I changed carbs last year and it's been doing it since. I've rejetted the primaries so the car is not running too rich or lean. I believe the timing is set to 14 DBTDC (need to double check this). I recently changed the secondary jets from 66 to 69 and haven't noticed a change. At this point I'm thinking of reducing the timing a few degrees or changing the secondary spring (both on suggestion from different friends who are more knowledgeable than me but don't seem to agree).

The engine is a 289 that has been decked 0.10. The heads are ported and polished 351W heads with roller rockers, double valve springs and stainless valves. It has 10.5:1 pistons, the cylinders are bored 0.30 and it's got a 0.512 lift/292 duration cam. I changed the carb from a Holley 670 street avenger to a 570 street avenger.

I know it's hard to diagnose a problem this way but I would be interested in knowing which avenue I should head down and I'm also wondering if the problem may be that the carb is not big enough for the engine mods. I appreciate any advice, thanks!!!
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Apr 18, 2012
#2
  • Apr 18, 2012
  • #2
Where is your timing at right now? When you did your last tune, did you use a vacuum guage?
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Apr 18, 2012
#3
  • Apr 18, 2012
  • #3
Hi,
You best attack, is to add O2 sensor bungs to your headers. After which, visit your local speed shop with a chassis Dyno, remove the air cleaner, have them attached an AFR meter then make 3 runs from about 2500-2800 to your expected red-line.
Then review the AFR. Ideally, you want an fairly flat AFR of about 12.9-13.3-5, or so. It's OK if it goes slightly lean when they "punch-it", but then, it should level. Use this to decide what to do with both primaries and secondaries.
It's worth the $150-200 for the runs and advice.
Good Luck!
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Apr 19, 2012
#4
  • Apr 19, 2012
  • #4
PoppyMod said:
Hi,
You best attack, is to add O2 sensor bungs to your headers. After which, visit your local speed shop with a chassis Dyno, remove the air cleaner, have them attached an AFR meter then make 3 runs from about 2500-2800 to your expected red-line.
Then review the AFR. Ideally, you want an fairly flat AFR of about 12.9-13.3-5, or so. It's OK if it goes slightly lean when they "punch-it", but then, it should level. Use this to decide what to do with both primaries and secondaries.
It's worth the $150-200 for the runs and advice.
Good Luck!
Click to expand...


This is good advice, makes for a really good picture of what's going on. What is your total timing and what rpm is it all in at? Best approach is to do deal with it one at a time. Get the timing set correctly, then work on the carb.
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Apr 19, 2012
#5
  • Apr 19, 2012
  • #5
69Rcode_Mach1 said:
This is good advice, makes for a really good picture of what's going on. What is your total timing and what rpm is it all in at? Best approach is to do deal with it one at a time. Get the timing set correctly, then work on the carb.
Click to expand...

Hi,
First, you need to determine the built-in mechanical of your distributor. This together with your initial, will be your total advance. As an example, I'm running a '67 dist. which has about 23 deg. built-in. I'm running about 14-15 initial. This makes for a total of 38-39 total. Most of our SBFs will tolerate a total of about 38 deg. However, there are any number of variables, fuel quality, ignition quality, combustion chamber shape, altitude, cam events, and power band, etc.
Also know, you have about 10 degrees of adjustable advance built in to your dist. vac canister.
Typically, you will want your total "all-in" by about 3000 Rs. Again, each engine and its components can cause this to vary. I've seen engines with "all in" by the mid twenties.
My engine build seems to run well at about 3K Rs. You might "creep" up on as much initial advance as your engine will tolerate and still start easily. Keep in mind the impact of your dist. vac will affect your mid-range and over all total without any detonation (too much advance and pinging).
Your engine's optimum settings can only be learned through testing on your local test ground or on a chassis dyno.
Good Luck!
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Apr 19, 2012
#6
  • Apr 19, 2012
  • #6
BY chance, have you tried to run the engine again, with the previous carb? Or did you get rid of it?
" If I get on it fairly hard I get a lot of pinging and smoke. "
Pinging to me says too much advance. Are you saying that the smoke you get is fuel?
Yours seems like a not over the top build, similar to my 289, and either carb should work great for that application.
 
M

MitchGT

Member
Apr 1, 2005
204
0
17
Apr 19, 2012
#7
  • Apr 19, 2012
  • #7
what color is the smoke? black, like unburnt fuel?
 

bdepedro

Member
Nov 6, 2006
362
2
19
Outer Banks, NC
Apr 20, 2012
#8
  • Apr 20, 2012
  • #8
Thanks for all the responses. The nearest dyno is 1 1/2 hours away so I'll have to make some plans for that. Sounds like a smart way to get a precise tune though.

I'm running an MSD distributor, coil and controller so I'd have to see if I can figure out the built in advance. I'm going to check this weekend to see what the current timing setting is. I set it last fall but can't remember.

The smoke is grey and with the pinging, I'm thinking a very lean situation under load. Does that sound right?
 

bdepedro

Member
Nov 6, 2006
362
2
19
Outer Banks, NC
Apr 20, 2012
#9
  • Apr 20, 2012
  • #9
I did get rid of the old carb but could easily borrow it or buy it back if needed.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Apr 20, 2012
#10
  • Apr 20, 2012
  • #10
If the car ran better before the carb change, and nothing else has been modified since, then it seems reasonable to find out what the jets are in the other carbs. Either one would be an acceptable size, the smaller one having better low end response.
 

bdepedro

Member
Nov 6, 2006
362
2
19
Outer Banks, NC
Apr 23, 2012
#11
  • Apr 23, 2012
  • #11
I actually talked to the guy I gave the old carb to this weekend and he's going to let me check the jet sizes in it. It will be interesting to see what differences the jet sizes are to the carb I'm running now because the old primary system was rich and the current one is good whereas the old secondary system was good and the new one lean, or so I think. I'll post what I find out.
 
T

TommyK

New Member
Jan 15, 2011
14
0
2
CT
Apr 24, 2012
#12
  • Apr 24, 2012
  • #12
The Avenger series carbs have notoriously lean calibrations and upsidedown fuel curves meaning they are rich at idle and lean at WOT. Having said that I think there is a possibility you have a combination of circumstances which are contributing to the issues you are experiencing which if left uncorrected could result in a serious boo boo to your engine. Unknown compression ratio, unknown total timing and lean WOT runs can equal "BOOM". When I ran a 670 on a 4V cleveland I needed an 8 jet split front to back AND had to enlarge the PVCR's to get enough fuel in it so it didn't lean miss under heavy load. Instead of paying for dyno time you may want to consider buying a wideband O2 system and learning to tune it yourself.

The quick fix is to verify your total timing isn't more than say 34 degrees and up the secondary jet a bunch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
647
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
D
Engine 85 GT Backfires through Carb
  • DienstXIV
  • Oct 3, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
588
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 7, 2025
85GTStangGuy
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
712
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
484
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Gas in my oil
  • limp
  • Jun 15, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 16, 2026
Mindseye007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?