• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Carbs... Not just for nutrition

  • Thread starter Thread starter HDTony
  • Start date Start date Nov 23, 2010

HDTony

Member
Oct 15, 2010
134
2
19
Plainfield IL
Nov 23, 2010
#1
  • Nov 23, 2010
  • #1
Alright here comes tony's question of the week. Im doing some more shopping and im moving up the engine from top to bottom.

347
Afr 185 comp heads
Edelbrock intake
Comp cams 1.6 rockers
One of fti's badass custom cams

Yada yada yada

Im shopping for a carb, looking at hollys 770 or edelbroke, anyone have any input on carbs? The more i read, the more i realize theres just too much information on the web and i dont know who to believe
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
53
Queen Creek Arizona
streetfire.net
Nov 23, 2010
#2
  • Nov 23, 2010
  • #2
Well, I love my Prosystems carb on mine. Runs great and they have great customer service.
Demon's are good carbs too, but I wont give BG a dime of my money after all the BS with their leaky fuel pumps.

Actually have 3 of their carbs on different cars. Never had luck with the edelbrock carb, but I know a few ppl that seem to like them.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Nov 24, 2010
#3
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • #3
I prefer Holley's myself. What kind of transmission and rear end gear ratio are you running? I think for what you've described, a good old Holley vacuum secondary 750 would fit the bill. However, there is something to be said for custom carb work, like custm cam work, custom head work, etc...
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 24, 2010
#4
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • #4
Carbs ? Nothing like multiple Holleys on the same engine. Love my tripower on my 331. No muss, no fuss, just dead on reliable for 6 years now.
 

HDTony

Member
Oct 15, 2010
134
2
19
Plainfield IL
Nov 24, 2010
#5
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • #5
T-5 trans and i have a 9" with a 3.70 gear on its way. I'm partial to holleys, but only because its what has been on other cars ive owned. I've never actually purchased a new carb before.

So a 750 vacume secondary would provide the proper volume for this motor?
 
6

68RCodeConv

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
345
0
0
67
Houston, TX
Nov 24, 2010
#6
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • #6
I've got a 347 with worked Dart Pro 1 heads, Cobra intake.

I've run both a VS 750 Holley and a VS Edelbrock 750. I liked the Holley just fine but I kept having idle problems with it and I just got tired of fiddling with it. I got the Edelbrock and maybe lost a few HP (like I care on the street) but all I had to do was make one metering rod change and it runs great.

Holley will make more power with some tuning but an Edelbrock is pretty much set and forget.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
46
Algonquin, IL
www.cardomain.com
Nov 24, 2010
#7
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • #7
I have the 650 mighty demon and really like it. I had a edel. 750, and i liked it for most driving, but it just didn't seem to have the punch the might demon does.
 

robbz28

10 Year Member
Sep 23, 2009
775
5
39
Epps, LA
Nov 24, 2010
#8
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • #8
A holley 750 vaccum secondary would be a good carb, but if gas mileage is no issue something like a 650 double pumper would really liven things up. Something about that mechanical secondary and that Instant gratification you get when you smash your foot into the floorboard always made it worth it to me, but whatever carb you get make sure you have it tuned, makes all the difference in the world. But in fairness I have never used an edelbrock, but have heard good things.
 

HDTony

Member
Oct 15, 2010
134
2
19
Plainfield IL
Nov 24, 2010
#9
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • #9
Ya know that is a question i had, what is the difference of a mechanical secondary?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 24, 2010
#10
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • #10
HDTony said:
Ya know that is a question i had, what is the difference of a mechanical secondary?
Click to expand...

Mechanical secondarys open all the way when you nail the go pedal. Vacuum secs open with engine demand, but can be tuned to open early or late as you like (on Holleys) And as robbz298 suggested, if you go with a mech carb, go smaller on cfms.
 

HDTony

Member
Oct 15, 2010
134
2
19
Plainfield IL
Nov 24, 2010
#11
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • #11
D.Hearne said:
Mechanical secondarys open all the way when you nail the go pedal. Vacuum secs open with engine demand, but can be tuned to open early or late as you like (on Holleys) And as robbz298 suggested, if you go with a mech carb, go smaller on cfms.
Click to expand...

Gotcha, thanks for the explanation
 

robbz28

10 Year Member
Sep 23, 2009
775
5
39
Epps, LA
Nov 24, 2010
#12
  • Nov 24, 2010
  • #12
A vaccum secondary is better on fuel because you run around on the rear two barrels (approx 350 cfm) only pulling fuel out of that side of the carburetor, until you nail it, then the rear barrels will slowly open (usually around 4000 rpm) and the car kind of eases into the power. On a mechanical secondary you can run around at around 1/3 throttle with the front barrels only, but then the rears open the further u press, but when you press they all 4 slam open and if everything is tuned right that baby will go! Anyway, since you asked about vaccum and mechanical, D did a fine job I just wanted to tell you a little more, its late and im bored.
 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Nov 27, 2010
#13
  • Nov 27, 2010
  • #13
I have a 347 that is very close to what you have described. I ran both a Mighty Demon 650 DP and a Holley 750 HP carb during a recent dyno session and the Demon made the most HP by just a hair (about 3-4 hp different) I don't know what these dyno guys all look at but during the testing the fellow running the dyno said that the motor was not carb limited even with the 650. I have gotten 19 mpg with it with 3.55 gears and a T5 with a .74 custom 5th gear. The motor made 465 hp. I would buy the Demon again in a heart beat. Depends on the cam duration as to which Demon you should select.
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
41
Tyler, TX
members.cardomain.com
Nov 27, 2010
#14
  • Nov 27, 2010
  • #14
For performance, your Edelbrocks probably won't be the ticket...Holley and Demon are better any day of the week.

Having said that, I ran an Edelbrock on my ol '68 and loved it, and currently run a Carter AFB (upon which the Edelbrock is based) on my 'vert and love both. Great response, easy to swap metering rods, good mileage, and both seem to hold a tune perfectly. Probably a better day-to-day carburetor for the daily driver/cruiser.
 

HDTony

Member
Oct 15, 2010
134
2
19
Plainfield IL
Nov 28, 2010
#15
  • Nov 28, 2010
  • #15
Thanks for all the help guys! Very informative.
 

PoppyMod

Member
Jun 27, 2010
617
6
19
Severna Park, MD
Nov 30, 2010
#16
  • Nov 30, 2010
  • #16
HDTony said:
Alright here comes tony's question of the week. Im doing some more shopping and im moving up the engine from top to bottom.

347
Afr 185 comp heads
Edelbrock intake
Comp cams 1.6 rockers
One of fti's badass custom cams

Yada yada yada

Im shopping for a carb, looking at hollys 770 or edelbroke, anyone have any input on carbs? The more i read, the more i realize theres just too much information on the web and i dont know who to believe
Click to expand...

I believe in a custom build. After all, you provide the specs, and you get an out-of-the-box that's closer to "right" than off the shelf and 6 months of tuning. Previous to these Webers, I ran a ProSystem 680 Holly XE. It was perfect OTB! But, I do love my Webers too!
Go Custom!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
654
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 19, 2026
spencergt66
S
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
C
347 stroker power estimate? Expected 1/4 mile run?
  • clayton seiders
  • Nov 29, 2023
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Nov 29, 2023
clayton seiders
C
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
C
331 build power expectations?
  • clayton seiders
  • Sep 5, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 7, 2023
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?