• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

carburated 4.6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryan441
  • Start date Start date Aug 1, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
R

Ryan441

Member
Nov 26, 2007
173
0
16
wintersprings, fl
Aug 1, 2008
#1
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #1
i saw this new intake manifold to carburate your 4.6 it says that just the intake and carb made like 70hp. now on summit the operating rang starts at 3500. would this be a good choice for a street/strip car? either way it sounds badas
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 1, 2008
#2
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #2
Its probaly the Edelbrock intake manifold. They have one for fuel injection, and one for carb applications.

If they made 70hp it was probaly on a built and cammed 4.6 with a stock tb/intake/plenum starving for air, and it was crank HP... no way it would see that at the wheels on a stock or even mildley modded 4.6.

Fuel injection is very efficient, you can go in and tune basically every parameter of a fuel injected 4.6, you have a very limited range to tune a carb comparativley.
 

02nightmaregt

To hell with your Mustang, I want to see your HOG!
Jul 1, 2007
513
4
19
Southern Indiana
Aug 1, 2008
#3
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #3
That is interesting but theres no way i go backwards in terms of technology. I would be interested to see a fully built and carbed 4.6.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 1, 2008
#4
  • Aug 1, 2008
  • #4
It would be great for someone who wanted to swap a 4.6 into a different vehicle, like a Fox or something.

I have see a few carbed 4.6 Fox's floating around the net, pretty cool looking set up to say the least... but didn't see any power figures.
 
R

Ryan441

Member
Nov 26, 2007
173
0
16
wintersprings, fl
Aug 4, 2008
#5
  • Aug 4, 2008
  • #5
look at last months hotrod mag. the artical "junk yard 4.6 jewel" with a pi head swap on a 98 crown vic w/ 120k miles that intake w/ holly 650 and lt's it made 378hp and w/ a carb spacer it made 396hp. you cant tell me your gonna make that with the stock setup
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 4, 2008
#6
  • Aug 4, 2008
  • #6
Ryan441 said:
look at last months hotrod mag. the artical "junk yard 4.6 jewel" with a pi head swap on a 98 crown vic w/ 120k miles that intake w/ holly 650 and lt's it made 378hp and w/ a carb spacer it made 396hp. you cant tell me your gonna make that with the stock setup
Click to expand...


Man there isnt any way they turned out those numbers on a STOCK PI swap only 4.6. They are either fudging the numbers or they are leaving and important detail out

I wouldnt beleive that even if that was at the crank and not the wheels.

Think about it, most 4.6 guys in a Mustang 5 speed (not sucking up as much power as an auto) are putting down around 360-380 with blowers...

No way in hell that you can switch from FI to carb and a new intake manifold and put out as much power as the same motor, FI under boost...

Plus the operating range starts at 3500RPM... you would really need to wind the engine out to take advantage of a broad power range. Something that wont happen without better cams, and even moreso ported heads to move all that air.


I'm not saying that to attack you at all, but I don't beleive what the magazine is claiming...
 
J

jprovence

New Member
May 20, 2007
195
0
0
Albany, OR
Aug 5, 2008
#7
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #7
I have the article right here with me. It was done on a PORTED AND CAMMED Pi swap. But thats it. CNC'd heads, didn't specifiy who ported them though. COMP XE274H cams and springs. It used a Barry Grant 575cfm Mighty Demon and BBK full lenght headers. Nothing special. Just made more power then a stock terminator. 396crank HP. Total cost was like 5 grand, heads and all. Alot cheaper sense most of us already have the motor. Carbs can feed a motor with far for air then most of the intakes for these motors allow. They did rev to 6500rpm. I bet it gets there with ease sense it doesn't have the crappy intake and heads holding it back. Made about 350ftlbs of torqe.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Aug 5, 2008
#8
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #8
jprovence said:
I have the article right here with me. It was done on a PORTED AND CAMMED Pi swap. But thats it. CNC'd heads, didn't specifiy who ported them though. COMP XE274H cams and springs. It used a Barry Grant 575cfm Mighty Demon and BBK full lenght headers. Nothing special. Just made more power then a stock terminator. 396crank HP. Total cost was like 5 grand, heads and all. Alot cheaper sense most of us already have the motor. Carbs can feed a motor with far for air then most of the intakes for these motors allow. They did rev to 6500rpm. I bet it gets there with ease sense it doesn't have the crappy intake and heads holding it back. Made about 350ftlbs of torqe.
Click to expand...


Cool. Thats exactly what I figured was done...

Cammed, ported, revved out, and HP was at the crank.


Wonder what that same 4.6 w/FI with a good tune would put down under the same conditions?
 

mrvax

Stay thirsty my friends
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,225
3
79
SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Aug 5, 2008
#9
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #9
I'd really like a direct comparison. Exact setup with carb then FI.
Otherwise you really can't make any imperical claims about the effectiveness of the carb setup.

Amazing numbers though.
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Aug 5, 2008
#10
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #10
I've been thinking about going carb on my engine. I would love to run the weber setup that Kar Kraft designed.
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Aug 5, 2008
#11
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #11
There is a guy local to me that has a 99-01 Cobra thats carburated but really don't know a whole lot about it. I know he did a custome job all by himslef and it took him about 2 months to do it.

Next time I see him I'll snap some shots of it and get some more info about it.
 

SRT Handz

I tripped & fell down and cut myself & got blood
Oct 10, 2004
941
23
19
La Mirada, CA
Aug 5, 2008
#12
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #12
FI>Carb
 

Tim2002GT

Founding Member
Apr 10, 2002
635
4
29
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Aug 5, 2008
#13
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #13
SRT Handz said:
FI>Carb
Click to expand...

:Word:
 
J

jprovence

New Member
May 20, 2007
195
0
0
Albany, OR
Aug 5, 2008
#14
  • Aug 5, 2008
  • #14
I would like to see what a 2v FI with a similar set up would do. Say using a fox lake manifold instead of the eldelbrock setup.

But lets face it, the only way to make power on these motors with their small displacement is rev. 6500rpm isn't really that high. Foxlake claims with their intake and heads and cam kit, you get about 100hp. That puts it with in range of this setup. Though much more expensive. This is the cheapest most powerful N/A 2v that one could proably build.
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Aug 6, 2008
#15
  • Aug 6, 2008
  • #15
jprovence said:
I would like to see what a 2v FI with a similar set up would do. Say using a fox lake manifold instead of the eldelbrock setup.

But lets face it, the only way to make power on these motors with their small displacement is rev. 6500rpm isn't really that high. Foxlake claims with their intake and heads and cam kit, you get about 100hp. That puts it with in range of this setup. Though much more expensive. This is the cheapest most powerful N/A 2v that one could proably build.
Click to expand...
There are other ways to get that extra 100rwhp .
 

blckstng96

Member
Apr 13, 2004
208
0
16
Aug 6, 2008
#16
  • Aug 6, 2008
  • #16
There is no way the car is making in the 390 range at the wheels with that,the most i have EVER seen a 2valve n/a car make was 380 rwhp with insane high compression.and reving a stock bottom end to 6500 isnt a good idea in my opinion.carb would be cool for a modular swap into a diff car,but why would you get rid of an efficient fule injected set up for a carb,doesnt make sense to me unless your car is a wiring nightmare or it was going into a diff car.
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
Ohio
Aug 6, 2008
#17
  • Aug 6, 2008
  • #17
blckstng96 said:
There is no way the car is making in the 390 range at the wheels with that,the most i have EVER seen a 2valve n/a car make was 380 rwhp with insane high compression.and reving a stock bottom end to 6500 isnt a good idea in my opinion.carb would be cool for a modular swap into a diff car,but why would you get rid of an efficient fule injected set up for a carb,doesnt make sense to me unless your car is a wiring nightmare or it was going into a diff car.
Click to expand...
They are referring to FWHP.
 

eliteJAE

Member
May 29, 2007
0
1
16
Stanford University
Aug 6, 2008
#18
  • Aug 6, 2008
  • #18
Testing 4.6L Mod Motor Intake Manifolds - Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords Magazine

Read through that article, they test out all sorts of intakes and even a carb setup on a modern 4.6 (page 3).

Granted, its on a 4v, but you'll see the comparison in power and range between fuel injection and carb setup
 

blckstng96

Member
Apr 13, 2004
208
0
16
Aug 6, 2008
#19
  • Aug 6, 2008
  • #19
a 4 valve and 2 valve you cant compare numbers.also how do you adjust timing and everything,your still gunna need a tune,so u gotta tune this thing double really,the carb and then through the ecm?
 

blckstng96

Member
Apr 13, 2004
208
0
16
Aug 6, 2008
#20
  • Aug 6, 2008
  • #20
i don't beleive mag articles on hp numbers,they are getting the hook up on the parts bc they are SELLING/HELPING SELL the merchandise by making it look good,obviously they would try and say the best things about it and prob fudge the numbers slightly.idk,im just not a believer
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
318
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
J
Engine 4.6 Running rough at half throttle
  • jake411
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
102
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Tuesday at 3:38 PM
jake411
J
F
Fox 1990 Mustang GT 5.0 A9L – Engine suddenly shuts off but immediately restarts when key turned
  • FishermansFriend
  • Yesterday at 9:39 AM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
38
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Yesterday at 3:32 PM
AeroCoupe
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
380
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
A
need help and advise
  • amps1956
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
16
Views
693
Other Auto Tech Oct 21, 2025
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?