• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Cash for Clunkers sounded ok until I read they would destroy my stang

  • Thread starter Thread starter jay90GT302
  • Start date Start date Jul 17, 2009
J

jay90GT302

New Member
Mar 2, 2008
16
0
0
Jul 17, 2009
#1
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • #1
I have a 90GT almost all rebuilt in good shape with an excellent and rarer these days all-black interior. I have had her for almost 2 years and I decided it was finally S197 time, so i'd figured i'd sell her for around 4 grand. It qualifies for cash for clunkers because it gets under 18mpg combined according to the 90 window sticker. So the program, sounded good at first, a quick 4500 for my car but then I realized I would only get 3500. If i get a new car 4mpg better i get 3500 for it and 10mpg better 4500, but the thing is i would only get the 3500 for upgrading to a new stang, and there is no car/econo-box i would want that gets 27 combined to get the 4500 credit. I then read on to find the gov would destroy my car with this program... NO DEAL
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Jul 17, 2009
#2
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • #2
Under the bill, the engine and transmission of the vehicle traded in must be destroyed, but the body and other components are sold off to salvage yards for resale.

I hate how every car guy now talks about this bill as if the government is going to send out a fleet of men in black suits and black sunglasses in black tow trucks to forcibly remove their vehicles from their gaages for a tiny government rebate. The bill is VOLUNTARY. So, under that logic, don't trade in your $50,000 '69 Chevelle for a $3500 rebate towards a new Chevy Cobalt. You'll never even see a check, as the money is sent as an electronic credit directly to the dealership. Here's an idea: don't trade in your car under the bill.

Let the record show that I hate this bill and I hope it gets caught up in senate red tape due to all of the lobbying against it by environmental groups. It's a terrible idea and will be ineffective at its proposed goal of increasing overall fuel efficiency. The REAL goal of the bill is to clear inventory off the lots of American dealerships and get the car companies off government funding.
 

BigDanTheMan

Member
Aug 16, 2005
63
1
6
San Francisco, CA
Jul 17, 2009
#3
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • #3
don't you have to buy a new car off the lot too?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jul 17, 2009
#4
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • #4
The bill is more or less a garantee that whatever POS you trade in will get you at least 4500. That way anyone with a qualifying vehicle has an automatic 4500 towards the purchase of a new car.

The gov't buys the car for 4500 no matter what and destroys the drivetrain.

You need to have owned the car at least 1 year...so no going out and buying a $1000 POS and trading it in.

If your trade is worth more than $4500...then this bill is not for you

ANyone trading a Mustang in (unless it's a total rotbox POS) should be ashamed!
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Jul 17, 2009
#5
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • #5
Mustang5L5 said:
The bill is more or less a garantee that whatever POS you trade in will get you at least 4500. That way anyone with a qualifying vehicle has an automatic 4500 towards the purchase of a new car.

The gov't buys the car for 4500 no matter what and destroys the drivetrain.

You need to have owned the car at least 1 year...so no going out and buying a $1000 POS and trading it in.

If your trade is worth more than $4500...then this bill is not for you

ANyone trading a Mustang in (unless it's a total rotbox POS) should be ashamed!
Click to expand...

could i trade in my old stang
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Jul 17, 2009
#6
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • #6
Shaolin Crane said:
could i trade in my old stang
Click to expand...



Trade-in’s have to be drivable vehicles made in the last 25 years, continuously insured by the same owner for at least one year with a fuel economy rating of no more than 18 miles per gallon.

There are also restrictions on what cars can be bought to replace the clunkers.
Click to expand...



Actually, my dad has a '97 Dodge Ram POS he wants to get rid of...so i gotta look into this for him.
 
R

rk122075

New Member
Jan 14, 2006
0
0
0
Jul 17, 2009
#7
  • Jul 17, 2009
  • #7
This bill will never pass.... Too many ifs and buts. The gov't is only allotting a certain amount of money towards taking the clunkers off the road. :SNSign:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Nissan V8 Swapping a 1996 SN95 Mustang. Have I lost my mind?
  • TJ Rebuild
  • Feb 14, 2021
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2021
LILCBRA
Plans for My 'Stang
  • DRB5
  • Jul 6, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 11, 2011
Stever89
What would you guys do? (Considering buying another Stang, long read)
  • LarsD
  • Oct 29, 2010
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
7K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 19, 2010
LarsD
The Thundercolt
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Nov 19, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 21, 2017
RaggedGT
The rematch (Or how I learned about nitrous....The hard way) only 1 left!
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 29, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2011
CarMichael Angelo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?