• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

catback gain's for 01 cobra???

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98slow-pony
  • Start date Start date Sep 2, 2006

98slow-pony

New Member
Jun 7, 2006
8
0
0
Epping,New Hampshire
Sep 2, 2006
#1
  • Sep 2, 2006
  • #1
does anyone now the h.p. gains for any particular aftercat exhaust i'm looking to buy one for the 01 cobra i just bought (19$thousand with 45000 miles triple black convert) wondering which is best (gains) and which sounds best...any info much appreciated
 
M

mustangcam

New Member
Mar 21, 2006
70
0
0
Pensacola, Florida
Sep 3, 2006
#2
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #2
cat-back's do not give any power really. somethin like
2-5hp. but i have an 01 cobra and just put a mac cat-back on it and it sounds great.
 

COBRA90GT

Mustang Master
Sep 22, 2001
6,654
0
87
HOCKEYTOWN ® , MI
Sep 3, 2006
#3
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #3
For performance gains, definitely go with a straight-through design muffler (ie - Dynomax, Magnaflow, Bassani, Borla, etc, etc) instead of a chambered style (ie - Flowmaster) muffler.

For sound - go with whatever sounds best to your ears. The mustangexhaust.com website is a pretty good source for mustang exhaust reviews, sounds, videos, etc, etc.

The midpipe and catback are fairly restrictive on the 99/01 snakes but not nearly as restrictive when compared to a forced induction application such as the 03/04 cobras.

You will still free up a decent amount of power by swapping the midpipe and catback, at least I did (see sig).
 

1999SVTVert

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
70
0
0
Gainesville, FL
Sep 3, 2006
#4
  • Sep 3, 2006
  • #4
I'm a big fan of the Magnaflow Cat X and Magnaflow Catback- Somewhat refined sound for the neighbors, but plenty mean sounding when you get on it.
 

98slow-pony

New Member
Jun 7, 2006
8
0
0
Epping,New Hampshire
Sep 4, 2006
#5
  • Sep 4, 2006
  • #5
exhaust..

thanx for all the info guys i was actually looking at this mac catback from an internet site called mustang tuning for 389$ good or bad???
 
G

greenstang1313

New Member
Jun 15, 2005
158
0
0
Chelmsford, MA
Sep 11, 2006
#6
  • Sep 11, 2006
  • #6
If you're gonna leave the stock headers and stock mid-pipe on, dont expect performance gains. Just a couple horsepower. Youd be better off putting on some long tube headers and an offroad H or X pipe.
 

cobrahissss

New Member
Jun 14, 2004
37
0
0
Seneca, SC
Oct 6, 2006
#7
  • Oct 6, 2006
  • #7
I spent $85 putting on simple 13 inch glass packs. The power gain over the stock mufflers felt like a turbo. even the 4:11 gears did not feel like this much power. I have had catless H pipe and 2 chamber flowmasters but with current Bassani catted x pipe with these glass packs the torque and power is the best by far. I drive 75 to 80 mph with no drone. As yall know the Flowmasters have a terrible drone.
 
S

svtpower

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
257
0
0
Wisconsin
Oct 7, 2006
#8
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #8
not true

I have to disagree about the power gains. I think a catback will give you some very good horsepower gains. Swapping out my mufflers for 3" Magnaflows was the most noticable power gain yet on my car.

If you want more power get a straight thru design like a Magnaflow catback. Chambered mufflers = piss poor flow, but some prefer the sound. I think the Maggies sound kick ass myself.
 
X

xerias

New Member
Oct 19, 2006
0
0
0
Oct 19, 2006
#9
  • Oct 19, 2006
  • #9
FRPP Dual mode mufflers/exhaust

People will preach straight though = performance ....not so true, while you will get better power on the high end your low end torque will suffer.....greatly...as i had the full magna flow 3 inch system and i was quite happy with it on the high end it left something to be desired down low....if you're willing to spend the $$$ overall the best exhaust i've seen and now use is the ford performance dual mode system these mufflers have a valve inside of them that gives you the necessary restriction for throwing people into the seats at low end, and open wide for incredibly good topend power.....you should look into these as they were used on the infamous fr500 project (One of the most versatile and wicked cars built by ford for under 50k)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
662
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Engine No start issue AGAIN!
  • ucnhtmenow1
  • Sep 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
920
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2024
89ripper
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
781
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?