• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Changed to 5-lug on my '89

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustanganatic
  • Start date Start date Sep 17, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Mustanganatic

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2001
79
0
6
Joe's Garage
Sep 17, 2011
#1
  • Sep 17, 2011
  • #1
I don't think there's a solution to my problem, but I figured I'd give it a shot. I changed over to 5-lug, used '94 spindles and the 5-lug hub. I'm using 17" x 9" '95 Cobra R wheels. Up front, I've got 235/45 tires. My problem is that the tire sticks out beyond the outside lip of the fender by 3/4". I've got lowering springs so it's an issue. It looks a little funky the way they stick out too. The hubs for '94-'03 are the same so a different hub isn't the answer. The only thing I can think of is different wheels with an offset that'll address this issue. Any other ideas?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,062
21,236
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 17, 2011
#2
  • Sep 17, 2011
  • #2
Pics?
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Sep 17, 2011
#3
  • Sep 17, 2011
  • #3
17X9 is kind of pushing it on a Fox. I would expect those to fit with 94 parts however. Can you make it better by pushing the struts in (I.E. more negative camber)? I hate to ask this, but are you sure you got 94 spindles?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,062
21,236
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 17, 2011
#4
  • Sep 17, 2011
  • #4
That's kinda what I was thinking. I don't recall there being a whole lot of problems with 17x9s and the 94/95 spindles.
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Sep 18, 2011
#5
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #5
Whats the current offset of the wheels?
 

Mustanganatic

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2001
79
0
6
Joe's Garage
Sep 18, 2011
#6
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #6
I had to go with 17" wheels, the whole reason for this deal is I'm putting Baer brakes on. I wanted R wheels and they only make 9". The offset is 24mm. As far as the spindle goes, I got them out of a bone yard, they took them off. I just picked them up at the counter. I believe '96 and up spindles are bigger. Changing the camber to fix this would make the tires run on the inside edge. The '93 Cobra uses the same hub, I'm wondering if '91+ fenders are wide enough. Flairing the fenders could be done too. I'm already beyond Pluto in spending on this project! Thanks for the input guys.



 

Attachments

  • 6158186896_29bf933a5d_b.webp
    157.7 KB · Views: 135
  • 6157642841_d035662877_b.webp
    169.9 KB · Views: 117

Mustanganatic

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2001
79
0
6
Joe's Garage
Sep 18, 2011
#7
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #7
Noobz347 said:
That's kinda what I was thinking. I don't recall there being a whole lot of problems with 17x9s and the 94/95 spindles.
Click to expand...

What did you use for hubs? I looked up hubs for a '94 and an '03, they're the same part no. The hubs are what is making the wheels stick out so much.
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Sep 18, 2011
#8
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #8
Here is the difference:



Now which do you have on the car? Because there is like a 13mm difference between 94/95 units, and the 96+ ones. 17x9's do fit (with a reasonable tire of course) with 94/95 spindles. 96+ will not work with 9" wide rim. 24 mils on a 9" rim is pretty much standard afaik. This was the reason when I did my conversion I sold the 97 units I had, and bought some 95 GT spindles since I figured I might run 9" rims one day.
 

Attachments

  • 94-95vs96-98spindle.webp
    25.6 KB · Views: 143

slow90coupe

Member
Apr 25, 2010
272
5
18
Sep 18, 2011
#9
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #9
mine looked almost like that when my suspension was stock. Then I did coilovers and C/C plates and turned the negative camber up some. Now I can actually tuck the tire if I want to.
 

Adams91LX

Active Member
Dec 9, 2003
689
12
29
Plano, TX
Sep 18, 2011
#10
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #10
I would suggest maybe a wheels swap? There are plenty of 17x8 options, although hard to find in the 95 Cobra R style... Bullitt's and OEM Mustang Wheels are often 17x8... I like the 96-98 GT Split 5 spoke wheels the best... but its up to you.
 

MFE92

10 Year Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,094
373
124
Phoenix
Sep 18, 2011
#11
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #11
Put the car on the ground and see what it looks like when the suspension settles and everything tucks the way it should. You should be able to fit 255's under there no problem, so your 235's aren't the issue, and 96+ spindles are only marginally "wider" than 94-95's, so if the tires still stick out when you're done, the problem is the offset on your wheels. Real "Cobra R" wheels have a different offset than aftermarket ones. And BTW you're going to want at least 1.25 negative camber and don't worry about the inside edges of the tires if your toe is set properly and the suspension bushings and tie rod ends are good.
 

ALMOST STOCK

Founding Member
Sep 23, 2000
1,250
41
88
CA.
Sep 18, 2011
#12
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #12
Mustanganatic we have a fairly similar set up.

My 89 GT is lowered 1" and I went with 94/95 spindles, 17 X 9 SSR wheels with 28+ offset, 245 X 40 X 17 tires, Baer Brakes and run the stock alignment settings and looks nothing like the problem your having.

From the top looking straight down.
View attachment 172757

View attachment 172759
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,089
2,691
224
Vass, NC
Sep 18, 2011
#13
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #13
Gorgeous car, Almost Stock.
 

Chrome_Rust

Member
Dec 5, 2008
530
1
17
Findlay, Ohio
Sep 18, 2011
#14
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #14
swap wheels side to side and see if the problem is still there. And you didnt have this problem with the old 4lug stuff right?
 

Mustanganatic

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2001
79
0
6
Joe's Garage
Sep 18, 2011
#15
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #15
Thanks Lars for the pictures of the spindles, I can now say for sure that I have '94/'95 spindles. One thing I haven't considered is that the car is still up on jacks, ergo the suspension is hanging on the opposite end of the suspension's travel arc. It may be resolved once the car is on the ground and the springs settle. What I believe the culprit for this issue is the hub. The picture below shows the hub I'm using, which is a Ford part used in '94 to at least '03. With the ABS exciter ring, it's so wide the wheel/tire stick out like that. Is that what everyone is using? Once again, thanks for all your input.

 

Attachments

  • 6160976492_3d55ff5fb9_z.webp
    119.8 KB · Views: 136

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Sep 18, 2011
#16
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #16
Mustanganatic said:
Thanks Lars for the pictures of the spindles, I can now say for sure that I have '94/'95 spindles. One thing I haven't considered is that the car is still up on jacks, ergo the suspension is hanging on the opposite end of the suspension's travel arc. It may be resolved once the car is on the ground and the springs settle. What I believe the culprit for this issue is the hub. The picture below shows the hub I'm using, which is a Ford part used in '94 to at least '03. With the ABS exciter ring, it's so wide the wheel/tire stick out like that. Is that what everyone is using? Once again, thanks for all your input.

http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6079/6160976492_3d55ff5fb9_z.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]

I still have the rings on mine, they do not affect the track width. Hold off on your concerns till you get it on the ground. That will make a huge difference. I didn't realize you hadn't put it on the floor yet.
Click to expand...
 

MFE92

10 Year Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,094
373
124
Phoenix
Sep 18, 2011
#17
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #17
The hubs without exciter rings are exactly the same dimensions. In fact, ALL the replacement '94-04 hubs come with exciter rings now whether you're spec'ing them out for an ABS car or not, it's cheaper for them to do that than it is to keep an entirely different part number in the parts pipeline for the few cars that didn't have ABS.
 

Mustanganatic

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2001
79
0
6
Joe's Garage
Sep 18, 2011
#18
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #18
Fairly Stock, I forgot to mention, nice looking GT! I see you got a '95 Cobra R hood also! Mine's an LX with a Saleen body kit. I'll get some pictures of it posted once I get it back on the ground and cleaned up. I got the wrong rear caliper brackets with my Baer brake kit, so I got to wait till I get the right ones.
 

Mustanganatic

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2001
79
0
6
Joe's Garage
Sep 18, 2011
#19
  • Sep 18, 2011
  • #19
MFE92 said:
The hubs without exciter rings are exactly the same dimensions. In fact, ALL the replacement '94-04 hubs come with exciter rings now whether you're spec'ing them out for an ABS car or not, it's cheaper for them to do that than it is to keep an entirely different part number in the parts pipeline for the few cars that didn't have ABS.
Click to expand...

Thanks MFE92, I just want to make sure others aren't using a different hub and I'm using the wrong one.
 

Mustanganatic

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2001
79
0
6
Joe's Garage
Sep 29, 2011
#20
  • Sep 29, 2011
  • #20
Finally got the car done! The dealer had it for 3 days. I had a leak on the back master cylinder line that I had to have a connector swapped for a female end. Figured it was just the wrong kind of flair on it, so I just trailered it up to the dealer since I had an appointment for a wheel alignment. After messing with the clusterf**k of tubing under there, I had an epiphany. Tear it all out and I'll get a Wilwood proportioning valve. The guys on the assembly line must have been sniffing glue that day, the lines out of the master cylinder was a can of worms. Anyways, it's behind me, although I'm doing heroin now! Thanks a whole bunch guys for all your input. Oh, MFE92, it's only got -0.2 degrees of camber and it seems to be OK so far. Here's some pictures:









 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
Y
Resolved 5 lug conversion
  • Ybfav84
  • Dec 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
601
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 21, 2024
AeroCoupe
18” vs. 17” wheels on fox
  • dz01
  • Nov 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 28, 2024
2000xp8
Progress Thread Low Mile 89 GT Restomod - Moving toward paint
  • KRUISR
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2026
KRUISR
S
Fox New to me 82 GT
  • Stangman7082
  • Jan 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?