• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Cheap way to lower a notchback?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1961Mustang
  • Start date Start date Mar 4, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
1

1961Mustang

Banned
Feb 20, 2010
39
2
19
My MOm's Basement, Delaware
Mar 4, 2012
#1
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #1
Hey it's always good to revisit a new way to do old tricks, right? I know there are lots of new products that have been introduced since the last thread on this subject, so: I want to drop my notch about 2". I figure I will need lowering springs, caster/camber plates, and a shock tower brace. What else do I need? I'm on a budget and I want to do as much as I can by myself to save money. I want to have everything I need to complete this project so my car is disabled for the shortest time, and I don't want to get into a situation where I am 90% done but have to wait two weeks for a part I forgot to order. Thanks for any help and advise!
 

Blown88GT

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1999
2,283
524
164
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Mar 4, 2012
#2
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #2
You said you are on a budget. What does a shock tower brace have to do with lowering the car? BTW, 2" is too much, 1-1.5" is enough. The quality of the spring is more important than the amount of drop. You don't really need the CC's if you lower the 1" with a quality spring. Struts & shocks are more important.
 
1

1961Mustang

Banned
Feb 20, 2010
39
2
19
My MOm's Basement, Delaware
Mar 4, 2012
#3
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #3
Meant to say strut tower not shock tower. Do I need shorter struts and shocks? So just a set of springs should do the trick? I was thinking I'd need the CCs because it looks like my front wheels are toed in just slightly now, and I thought lowering springs would exacerbate that issue? LMRS offers a nice set of lowering springs for under $200, any recommendations? Do i need new bump-stops? What shocks/struts specifically should i buy? I usually shop LMRS Thanks for the advise my friend!
 

foxbodymike87

Active Member
Jul 12, 2011
739
35
39
Mar 4, 2012
#4
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #4
strut tower and shock tower are the same thing. you dont need bump stops
 

jsw81

5 Year Member
Mar 19, 2007
307
71
68
IA
Mar 4, 2012
#5
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #5
Here is what I run:

SVE lowering springs from Latemodel restoration: $99
http://www.latemodelrestoration.com...04-Mustang-Specific-Rate-Red-Lowering-Springs

Ebay camber/caster plates:
For 85-89 mustangs: $109.95
http://www.ebay.com/itm/85-86-87-88...es&vxp=mtr&hash=item3362a98dfe#ht_2950wt_1270

For 90-93 mustangs: $115
http://www.ebay.com/itm/FRONT-CAMBER-CASTER-KIT-MUSTANG-90-93-/260946352050?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&fits=Year:1993|Model:Mustang&vxp=mtr&hash=item3cc19d57b2#ht_1397wt_1270

Front spring isolators (highly recommended, IMO): $35.99
http://www.latemodelrestoration.com/item/PT-61703BL/1979-04-Mustang-Urethane-Front-Spring-Isolators

Rear spring isolators (highly recommended, IMO): $24.99
http://www.latemodelrestoration.com...stang-GT-V6-Prothane-Rear-Spring-Isolator-set


So your looking at about $275 plus alignment. Not too shabby!

I run KYB GR2 shocks and struts; installed by previous owner. Stock would be fine for a while if they are in good shape. Remember ride quality will suffer.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,951
2,906
194
Middle of Maine
Mar 4, 2012
#6
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #6
Why are spring isolators "highly recommended"? Don't use them, save the $60.00 and the car sits about 1/4" lower.
 

jsw81

5 Year Member
Mar 19, 2007
307
71
68
IA
Mar 4, 2012
#7
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #7
Bullitt347 said:
Why are spring isolators "highly recommended"? Don't use then, save the $60.00 and the car sits about 1/4" lower.
Click to expand...
Don't know about you, but I am not a fan of the metal on metal contact. Might as well spend the $60 and do it the first time.

Plus the LRS springs already lower it about 2".
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,951
2,906
194
Middle of Maine
Mar 4, 2012
#8
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #8
The springs where they meet the metal are not "moving parts". There is no difference in ride quality or noise by not using the isolators. I have performed lowing spring installs on Fox Body and newer cars at least 100 times and never had a customer complain, ever. I had a few customers supply the isolator and request they be installed, which I did, but no one who did not have them ever complained or came back to have them installed. I also in 20 years of doing this have never seen a "wear" issue from lack of isolators.
 

jsw81

5 Year Member
Mar 19, 2007
307
71
68
IA
Mar 4, 2012
#9
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #9
Bullitt347 said:
The springs where they meet the metal are not "moving parts". There is no difference in ride quality or noise by not using the isolators. I have performed lowing spring installs on Fox Body and newer cars at least 100 times and never had a customer complain, ever. I had a few customers supply the isolator and request they be installed, which I did, but no one who did not have them ever complained or came back to have them installed. I also in 20 years of doing this have never seen a "wear" issue from lack of isolators.
Click to expand...
Cool story bro. The OP doesn't have to do it, just what I prefer for my springs.
 

foxbodymike87

Active Member
Jul 12, 2011
739
35
39
Mar 4, 2012
#10
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #10
Bullitt347 said:
The springs where they meet the metal are not "moving parts". There is no difference in ride quality or noise by not using the isolators. I have performed lowing spring installs on Fox Body and newer cars at least 100 times and never had a customer complain, ever. I had a few customers supply the isolator and request they be installed, which I did, but no one who did not have them ever complained or came back to have them installed. I also in 20 years of doing this have never seen a "wear" issue from lack of isolators.
Click to expand...
i didnt use them and it caused rubbing between the spring and the control arm in the rear, wich caused rusting and the spring was junk.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,951
2,906
194
Middle of Maine
Mar 4, 2012
#11
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #11
Exactly. I am not saying one way or the other is "better" than the other. One way is cheaper and that was what he was about.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,951
2,906
194
Middle of Maine
Mar 4, 2012
#12
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #12
foxbodymike87 said:
i didnt use them and it caused rubbing between the spring and the control arm in the rear, wich caused rusting and the spring was junk.
Click to expand...
I do not live in a rust belt, so I have never seen this. If you live in the rust belt, then by all means use them if it will save the springs from rusting.
 

foxbodymike87

Active Member
Jul 12, 2011
739
35
39
Mar 4, 2012
#13
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #13
Bullitt347 said:
I do not live in a rust belt, so I have never seen this. If you live in the rust belt, then by all means use them if it will save the springs from rusting.
Click to expand...
welcome to New England
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Mar 4, 2012
#14
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #14
Speaking from personal back to back comparison, spring isolators noticeably reduce ride harshness.

On another note, the SVE springs are specific rate. Yes, they will lower the car, but the ride quality will be quite stiff. I'd recommend a variable rate spring like an Eibach Prokit or something similar.
 

jsw81

5 Year Member
Mar 19, 2007
307
71
68
IA
Mar 4, 2012
#15
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #15
wythors said:
Speaking from personal back to back comparison, spring isolators noticeably reduce ride harshness.

On another note, the SVE springs are specific rate. Yes, they will lower the car, but the ride quality will be quite stiff. I'd recommend a variable rate spring like an Eibach Prokit or something similar.
Click to expand...

Yep, the ride quality will suffer with the SVE's. I don't mind it too much. If my car was a daily driver, that's a different story.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,951
2,906
194
Middle of Maine
Mar 4, 2012
#16
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #16
wythors said:
Speaking from personal back to back comparison, spring isolators noticeably reduce ride harshness.

On another note, the SVE springs are specific rate. Yes, they will lower the car, but the ride quality will be quite stiff. I'd recommend a variable rate spring like an Eibach Prokit or something similar.
Click to expand...
I guess some people are more sensitive or "in tune" with these types of things than I am. Dare I say "Princess and the Pea?" Anyway I agree about using a variable rate spring, much more liveable than the specific rate.
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Mar 4, 2012
#17
  • Mar 4, 2012
  • #17
You know what they say about opinions, right?
 
Reactions: ID89GT

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,951
2,906
194
Middle of Maine
Mar 5, 2012
#18
  • Mar 5, 2012
  • #18
Yeah, I am reminded all the time, but what can I say, I am an equal opportunity verbal abuser. I pick on everyone! Naturally I expect to get back what I give, all in good fun of coarse .
 

Want2GoFaster

Member
Jun 17, 2003
77
8
18
Nebraska
Mar 5, 2012
#19
  • Mar 5, 2012
  • #19
From what I've read about them, the SVE springs will give a stock ride feel only about 2" lower because they have the same spring rate as stock - just 2" shorter. In fact I have a set sitting in my garage. I installed them in the rear of my '94 GT and it raised the ass-end about an inch from where I'm at with my Sportlines. I pulled them back out without even running them.
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Mar 5, 2012
#20
  • Mar 5, 2012
  • #20
I used H&R race springs. what i did notice was 1/2 coil snapped off the front spring and was sitting in the lower arm. From the looks of it moisture sat between the rubber isolator and spring causing it to rot even faster. Then again i'm from New England too.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
Buying with a bad motor?
  • djj62478
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
256
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 11, 2026
TTSaleen
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
674
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
M
Broken lower intake bolts
  • Mike3
  • Aug 11, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
599
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 2, 2025
revhead347
T
2008 GT Parasitic drain - sjb
  • turcotjs
  • Aug 1, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
209
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 1, 2025
turcotjs
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?