• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

checkin p/v clearance questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter ECU5.0
  • Start date Start date Aug 5, 2005

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Aug 5, 2005
#1
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #1
alright, im getting my heads back tomorrow and before i install them i need to check the piston to valve clearance. i know how to do it, im just wondering if i can use the old head gaskets that came off the motor to do it instead of using the new ones? also, im going to be running 1.7 rockers on this motor but the ones i am using are on my car right now. is there anyway to use a stock rocker and figure in the extra lift? i also need to know what kind of thickness am i looking for in the clay when i do measure it? thanks for any help guys
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Aug 5, 2005
#2
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #2
You could probably do the math to figure out the p/v clearance with a 1.7rr, but why would you. The entire point of actually checking it is to KNOW, not estimate. It won't take that long to pull some of the rockers from the other car do the job and put them back. Worth it in my opinion. But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

I have always used an old head gasket, just make sure it is still in good shape. Don't use the one that came off the block in pieces.

I will let someone else answer the actual clearance question. Every time I have checked it I ended up with about .200" clearance so I didn't worry about it.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Aug 5, 2005
#3
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #3
any other opinions
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Aug 5, 2005
#4
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #4
ttt
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Aug 5, 2005
#5
  • Aug 5, 2005
  • #5
check it without the gaskets 1st...if it clears without the gasket, it will definetly clear with them
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Aug 6, 2005
#6
  • Aug 6, 2005
  • #6
does anyone know when its too close for comfort? a minimum clearance? and how would i figure clearance with the 1.7s if i used a stock rocker?
 

CrazyCobra

New Member
Apr 25, 2005
124
0
0
Ontario
Aug 6, 2005
#7
  • Aug 6, 2005
  • #7
ECU5.0 said:
does anyone know when its too close for comfort? a minimum clearance? and how would i figure clearance with the 1.7s if i used a stock rocker?
Click to expand...
.060" is the absolute minimum, however .100" is recomended. I would not estimate the clearence by calculating the 1.7 ratio, use a 1.7 and measure it.
good luck.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Aug 6, 2005
#8
  • Aug 6, 2005
  • #8
Minimum clearance depends on how much risk you're willing to take. In a racer where every HP counts and you're rebuilding components regularly, you might go with less. General rule of thumb is .080"-.100" intake; .100-.125" on the exhaust side. As recommended above, pull a 1.7 rocker off your motor and use it for your tests. Also, be sure you have a solid lifter to replace the hydraulic lifter --- the force of the valve spring will cause the spring/plunger in the hydraulic lifter to depress throwing off your p to v measurements.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Aug 6, 2005
#9
  • Aug 6, 2005
  • #9
...by the way, with that cam, the 1.7's vs. 1.6's will cause you to lose something on the order of .005"-.010" of p to v clearance.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Aug 6, 2005
#10
  • Aug 6, 2005
  • #10
alright, thanks for the help guys. now all i ahve to do is find a solid lifter...crap
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Aug 6, 2005
#11
  • Aug 6, 2005
  • #11
You can make one out of an old one by tack welding the plunger in place; or you can disassemble one of yours - and replace the spring with a solid piece that holds the plunger all the way up. Once you're through measuring intake and exhaust, put it back together the way it was before.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Aug 6, 2005
#12
  • Aug 6, 2005
  • #12
i think i have an old one layin around somewhere. ill get my buddy to weld it up. thanks for the help mike
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Aug 10, 2005
#13
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #13
alright, so went against everyones suggestion to use one of the 1.7 rockers off of my car to check the clearance and went ahead and used a stock 1.6 rocker. ive got right around .25 clearance on both intake and exhaust. does this sound right or no? the cam is advanced 4 degrees. no i didnt use a degree wheel but i lined up the dots on the cam and crank sprockets for 4* advanced. thanks for any input

edit: after rereading what it is supposed to be im a little concerned that my cam is way off in the timing. or am i just worrying myself
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Aug 10, 2005
#14
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #14
ECU5.0 said:
alright, so went against everyones suggestion to use one of the 1.7 rockers off of my car to check the clearance and went ahead and used a stock 1.6 rocker. ive got right around .25 clearance on both intake and exhaust. does this sound right or no? the cam is advanced 4 degrees. no i didnt use a degree wheel but i lined up the dots on the cam and crank sprockets for 4* advanced. thanks for any input

edit: after rereading what it is supposed to be im a little concerned that my cam is way off in the timing. or am i just worrying myself
Click to expand...

I had about .200" clearance so if you messed something up, I would like to know cause I probably did it too. More likely though we are both right as I don't think there is too much to really screw up.

To find the clearance change I would do this...

Multiply the cam lift by the rocker used to check clearance (1.6).

Multiply the cam lift by the 1.7 rocker.

Subtract the 1.6R lift from the 1.7R lift.

Subtract that difference from the .250" clearance that you already measured.

After illustrating how to do this I still recommend against it. The rocker ratios are probably not exact, due to manufacturing tolerances, even if this is small it is variation.
If you are still over .200" doing the above calculation you should be ok. But I still don't understand not checking it with the correct parts. Maybe you still plan to do this later, before installing the new motor?
Good Luck Dude
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Aug 10, 2005
#15
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #15
well the problem is....i started doing this at like 1 and didnt really want to tear my motor down just to do it and than have to put it back together so i can be at work by 4 just to tear it down again on friday night when i start pulling the old motor.

edit: just did some calculations and im still over .200 with the 1.7s. i doubt there is enough variance in the rockers that i have to cause a problem. i just subtracted the valve lift with the 1.6s from the valve lift with the 1.7s and got .030 and .039...so i should be good to go. i might recheck them with the 1.7s this weekend
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Aug 10, 2005
#16
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #16
Don't understand your math -- if you read the post, subtracting peak lift differences between 1.6's and 1.7's won't tell you anything about changes in p to v. At peak lift the pistons are way down the cylinders -- the clearance issue occurs during overlap - the valves are barely open.

Nevertheless, if you measured correctly and have on the order of .200" clearance then the rocker swap is completely safe. At worst with that cam you'll only lose .005 - .010" with the swap.

My E cam with 1.7's on a stock piston (reliefs) installed on a 110 CL had .110" clear intake; .210" clear exhaust.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Aug 10, 2005
#17
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #17
Michael Yount said:
Don't understand your math -- if you read the post, subtracting peak lift differences between 1.6's and 1.7's won't tell you anything about changes in p to v. At peak lift the pistons are way down the cylinders -- the clearance issue occurs during overlap - the valves are barely open.

Nevertheless, if you measured correctly and have on the order of .200" clearance then the rocker swap is completely safe. At worst with that cam you'll only lose .005 - .010" with the swap.

My E cam with 1.7's on a stock piston (reliefs) installed on a 110 CL had .110" clear intake; .210" clear exhaust.
Click to expand...


i didnt really understand my math either. but i figure with the measurement that i got with the 1.6s there wont be a problem with 1.7s. thanks for the help guys
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Aug 11, 2005
#18
  • Aug 11, 2005
  • #18
Now that I think about it that's not right.

So how are you coming up with .005-.010? I would like to know as I will be swapping out the cam and rockers fairly soon. I will need to consider valve clearance changes between 1.6 and 1.7 RR.
Appreciate the help.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Aug 11, 2005
#19
  • Aug 11, 2005
  • #19
Minimal valve to piston clearance with the TFS stage 1 cam being used likely occurs somewhere around zero to 10 ATDC. At that point, depending on the cam timing used, the lifter is somewhere around .050-.070" lift (lobe lift) which means the valve lift is somewhere around 1.6 times that; 1.7 times that with the other rockers. Do the math --- 1.6X.050" = valve lift of .080"; with the 1.7's that's .085" valve lift. There's your .005" difference - at the same point of minimum clearance, if you bolt on the 1.7 rocker, it's gonna hold the valve open .005" more at that point -- so you'd lose that much p to v clearance.

You need to measure your engine -- the differences can vary due to valve train geometry, stiffness of the rocker, variation from cylinder to cylinder, etc. But as you can see, even with variations, the reduction in p to v due to rocker ratio change with most milder street cams is relatively minor. In general -- rocker ratio change usually will neither cause a p to v problem -- nor solve one for you. As cam duration increases - and intakes open sooner/exhaust closes later - the differences will be greater. If in doubt - measure yours. But if you've got .200" to start with - a simple 1.6 to 1.7 rocker change isn't gonna come anywhere close to causing a problem. You're looking for .080"-.100" clearance on the intake and .100"-.125" clearance on the exhaust for safety. You can see - the change in clearance with the rocker swap is AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE smaller than the clearances needed.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 11, 2005
#20
  • Aug 11, 2005
  • #20
Michael Yount said:
Minimal valve to piston clearance with the TFS stage 1 cam being used likely occurs somewhere around zero to 10 ATDC. At that point, depending on the cam timing used, the lifter is somewhere around .050-.070" lift (lobe lift) which means the valve lift is somewhere around 1.6 times that; 1.7 times that with the other rockers. Do the math --- 1.6X.050" = valve lift of .080"; with the 1.7's that's .085" valve lift. There's your .005" difference - at the same point of minimum clearance, if you bolt on the 1.7 rocker, it's gonna hold the valve open .005" more at that point -- so you'd lose that much p to v clearance.

You need to measure your engine -- the differences can vary due to valve train geometry, stiffness of the rocker, variation from cylinder to cylinder, etc. But as you can see, even with variations, the reduction in p to v due to rocker ratio change with most milder street cams is relatively minor. In general -- rocker ratio change usually will neither cause a p to v problem -- nor solve one for you. As cam duration increases - and intakes open sooner/exhaust closes later - the differences will be greater. If in doubt - measure yours. But if you've got .200" to start with - a simple 1.6 to 1.7 rocker change isn't gonna come anywhere close to causing a problem. You're looking for .080"-.100" clearance on the intake and .100"-.125" clearance on the exhaust for safety. You can see - the change in clearance with the rocker swap is AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE smaller than the clearances needed.
Click to expand...




I usually shoot for .080" int .100" exh, but I have run tighter, a lot tighter...depends on the entire combo and intentions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
545
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
802
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
703
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?