• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Chrome Moly vs. Mild Steel

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChromdOutDubs
  • Start date Start date Feb 6, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

ChromdOutDubs

Member
Sep 1, 2005
268
1
18
Tavares, Florida
Feb 6, 2008
#1
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #1
I plan on making my own Lower Control Arms and i was just wondering how much of a difference there is in plain Mild Steel Tubing and Chrome Moly tubing. I see you can get both kinds on k-members but most of the control arms i see say they are made of Chrome Moly.

I want to use mild steel because i got tons of it at my fabrication shop and wouldn't be anything for me to make some up. If i went with Chrome Moly it would take some time for it to come in and also that stuff inst cheap at all!

Thanks

-AJ
 
3

347HO

Member
Jan 13, 2008
462
2
16
Seattle
Feb 6, 2008
#2
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #2
Well... since you fabricate, then you know mild steel takes well to mig and chromolly does really well with tig.
I can tell you there is a considerable weight difference between the two when you weigh the finished products!
Don't forget to use the "seamless" stuff.
Just my thoughts... and they aint worth much.
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Feb 6, 2008
#3
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #3
The chromooly will hold up to more abuse that the mild steel. But it will have to be tig welded.
 

ChromdOutDubs

Member
Sep 1, 2005
268
1
18
Tavares, Florida
Feb 6, 2008
#4
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #4
Thanks for the info.... But iv been looking at the prices of rod ends and it might be almost as cheap to buy some built, lol. Those QA1 rod ends are ridiculous.

-AJ
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Feb 7, 2008
#5
  • Feb 7, 2008
  • #5
Another thing to consider is if something were to happen, chromoly will just break and mild steel will have more give and bend. Definately get seamless.
Kevin
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Feb 7, 2008
#6
  • Feb 7, 2008
  • #6
I have a customer who has a beautiful 66 GTO that he has spent his life building. Every year he has updated and upgraded parts. He has a motor that made about 700FTLBS of TQ. Anyways....all he talks about is chrome-moly this and chrome moly that. He swears buy it, but he also has over 100,000 in his car. I guess it depends what you are looking to do.
 

ChromdOutDubs

Member
Sep 1, 2005
268
1
18
Tavares, Florida
Feb 7, 2008
#7
  • Feb 7, 2008
  • #7
SVT32VDOHC said:
but he also has over 100,000 in his car.
Click to expand...

Yeah me too, lol.

Ya i guess it is preference, im gonna go ahead and make them out of mild steel and if they break then i will go CM...

-AJ
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Feb 7, 2008
#8
  • Feb 7, 2008
  • #8
ChromdOutDubs said:
Yeah me too, lol.

Ya i guess it is preference, im gonna go ahead and make them out of mild steel and if they break then i will go CM...

-AJ
Click to expand...

Really? DAMN!!! In that case get the moly!!
 
M

Mike85000

New Member
Feb 22, 2007
65
0
0
Feb 7, 2008
#9
  • Feb 7, 2008
  • #9
The way i see it is Chromoly has a much higher UTS and USS. THerefore you can use less material when constructed from chromoly. Or if both piece are the same dimensions, the Chromoly will be much stronger than the MS.

Id say a properly designed set constructed of mild steel would be fine. But remember to factor in the strength of the material when selecting a tubing size.
 

ChromdOutDubs

Member
Sep 1, 2005
268
1
18
Tavares, Florida
Feb 7, 2008
#10
  • Feb 7, 2008
  • #10
I was going to use 1-5/8" Tubing with .120" Wall Thickness. I could make it out of solid Mild Steel Shaft, that would actually be the easiest and strongest but the weight would be the only issue. But for an extra 5-10 lbs it probably wont even matter.

-AJ
 
M

Mike85000

New Member
Feb 22, 2007
65
0
0
Feb 7, 2008
#11
  • Feb 7, 2008
  • #11
I wouldn't go soild stock. Tubing has a larger bending moment for a given amount of material than a solid piece. Solid would be quite heavy. Just take a look at what the aftermarket company's are using. If the suspension is setup properly most of the loading should be tension and compression, not bending. For 1 5/8 tubing i'd venture a guess that.250 wall would be more than enough. What kind of torque numbers are you running? THis is a street/strip car right?
 
3

347HO

Member
Jan 13, 2008
462
2
16
Seattle
Feb 8, 2008
#12
  • Feb 8, 2008
  • #12
1 5/8" appears a bit large????
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Feb 8, 2008
#13
  • Feb 8, 2008
  • #13
I think some are confusing strong for more rigid. While chromoly is by far more rigid...it's that rigidity that makes it more brital. That birtalness is what will make it far more prone to failing during street use. You'll find that quite a few places will recommend chromoly suspension components for track use only...as they won't see many of the daily impacts that you would on the road.
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Feb 8, 2008
#14
  • Feb 8, 2008
  • #14
347HO said:
1 5/8" appears a bit large????
Click to expand...

X2

I would go to a local speed shop or a buddies house with some tubular arms and reverse engineer them. Either that or do the stress/strain and bending moment calculations.
 
3

347HO

Member
Jan 13, 2008
462
2
16
Seattle
Feb 8, 2008
#15
  • Feb 8, 2008
  • #15
millhouse said:
I think some are confusing strong for more rigid. While chromoly is by far more rigid...it's that rigidity that makes it more brital. That birtalness is what will make it far more prone to failing during street use. You'll find that quite a few places will recommend chromoly suspension components for track use only...as they won't see many of the daily impacts that you would on the road.
Click to expand...

Seamless Chromolly is far, far superior to mild steel anywhere as to wall thickness being equal. You will not find very much mild steel in high performance, professional race cars pertaining to suspension and chassis components.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Feb 8, 2008
#16
  • Feb 8, 2008
  • #16
millhouse said:
I think some are confusing strong for more rigid. While chromoly is by far more rigid...it's that rigidity that makes it more brital. That birtalness is what will make it far more prone to failing during street use. You'll find that quite a few places will recommend chromoly suspension components for track use only...as they won't see many of the daily impacts that you would on the road.
Click to expand...
Nothing personal against you, but I do have a different perspective.

Along with the rigidity comes higher fatigue resistance...
Having a crack propagate through a part slowly isn't any better than having a crack propagate quickly through a part.

Either way the part has failed.
BUT, the chromoly will withstand higher cyclic loads before a crack develops.....
(or it will last for a longer cycle count at the same loads )

My opinion... chomoly is less often used on the street because of the cost associated with its use.

Whenever possible, use the best materials you can


jason
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Feb 8, 2008
#17
  • Feb 8, 2008
  • #17
vristang said:
Nothing personal against you, but I do have a different perspective.

Along with the rigidity comes higher fatigue resistance...
Having a crack propagate through a part slowly isn't any better than having a crack propagate quickly through a part.

Either way the part has failed.
BUT, the chromoly will withstand higher cyclic loads before a crack develops.....
(or it will last for a longer cycle count at the same loads )

My opinion... chomoly is less often used on the street because of the cost associated with its use.

Whenever possible, use the best materials you can


jason
Click to expand...

None taken.

My whole point however is what may cause a thin walled chromoly part crack can cause the thicker walled mild steel to flex....or in the worse case, bend. It's chromoly's rigidity which is it's weakness in high impact situations.

Really, I never saw a huge price difference in manufacturers offering offering both mild and chromoly.
 

ACSPONY

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 10, 2004
711
2
19
Ohio
Feb 9, 2008
#18
  • Feb 9, 2008
  • #18
samickguy15 said:
X2

I would go to a local speed shop or a buddies house with some tubular arms and reverse engineer them. Either that or do the stress/strain and bending moment calculations.
Click to expand...

Are you an engineer by chance? I was about to check out the elastic modulus on Chrome-Moly vs Steel
 
3

347HO

Member
Jan 13, 2008
462
2
16
Seattle
Feb 9, 2008
#19
  • Feb 9, 2008
  • #19
ACSPONY said:
Are you an engineer by chance? I was about to check out the elastic modulus on Chrome-Moly vs Steel
Click to expand...

Get with vristang. He does all that crazy stuff with metal alloys and whatnot.
I believe he's a metals engineer for some large aircraft manufacturer.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Feb 9, 2008
#20
  • Feb 9, 2008
  • #20
347HO said:
Get with vristang. He does all that crazy stuff with metal alloys and whatnot.
I believe he's a metals engineer for some large aircraft manufacturer.
Click to expand...
lol
I thought about posting some numbers, but it's tough to do a fair comparison when you don't know exactly what how the finishing is done.
heat treatments, manufacturers, etc.

I'll try to find some representative numbers on the net (that we can link to) later today (unless someone can beat me to it )
Usually google comes up with a decent variety...

jason


EDIT:
I don't engineer stuff, I just test stuff.
Cyclic loading and static loading to failure.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
124
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
801
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
481
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?