• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Classic Restorations

  • Thread starter Thread starter StreetsideStig
  • Start date Start date Mar 23, 2011

StreetsideStig

Active Member
Feb 22, 2011
1,012
48
48
Mar 23, 2011
#1
  • Mar 23, 2011
  • #1
I read the other day that Classic Restorations had been facing some legal trouble over their GT500CR for VIN violations. They sorted it out with the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation, and actually created a new law.

But it got me thinking- how do you guys feel about companies like this? The pros are that you get a reliably built Mustang with near stock specs. The cons are that it could drive down the value of originals, and that you don't get to rebuild one yourself.

What do you think?
 

mustangmutt

Member
Aug 2, 2010
339
6
18
El Paso, TX
Mar 23, 2011
#2
  • Mar 23, 2011
  • #2
I think a lot more people would be using the Dynacorn Bodies if the Nazis at the DMV made it easier to transfer a VIN or develop a method to VIN a Dynacorn body. Mustangs are beautiful cars and any effort to keep the Highways beautiful by allowing more of them on the road is a okay with me.

Whats the difference in taking an original body, stripping it to a bare shell and fitting it with all new aftermarket suspension, brakes, steering, engine and interior or building a Dynocorn body with all the new aftermarket stuff? If you want an original buy an original, if you want a full on restomoded bad ass, buy a Dynacorn. It would leave more originals available for those who want them.
 

mustangmutt

Member
Aug 2, 2010
339
6
18
El Paso, TX
Mar 23, 2011
#3
  • Mar 23, 2011
  • #3
BTW, I think you were talking about Classic Recreations.
 

StreetsideStig

Active Member
Feb 22, 2011
1,012
48
48
Mar 28, 2011
#4
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #4
Haha, good catch! Classic restorations would be something else entirely.

And I agree with you about the VIN. The gov't has to find a way to control everything.
 
H

highhorseb

Founding Member
Oct 26, 2001
226
0
16
Finksburg, Maryland
Mar 28, 2011
#5
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #5
Snippet from

1967 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500CR Recreation - Mustang Monthly

Now it's a matter of building and selling cars, all based on original '67 or '68 Mustang fastbacks, not Dynacorn replacement bodies. Jason explains that he feels cars with original bodies and Ford VINs-V-8 engine codes only-will hold their value better, which is important to buyers who are considering a car that is described as an "investment," meaning you'll need to get off your wallet to put one in your garage. In late March, Classic Recreations had 19 bodies awaiting their transformation. Jason says that he buys restorable bodies from around the world, even paying finder's fees.
Click to expand...

Now, I personally have no problems with the Dynacorn bodies and think they should be issued a VIN the same as a kit car (does a 427 Cobra sell for less because Factory 5 makes a kit car?). However, advertising the cars and charging a premium as original fastbacks then swapping the vin to a Dynacorn body is misleading and deceptive marketing. I don't know what charges OK brought Engel up on but I wouldn't purchase a $10 part from someone like that....
 

mustangmutt

Member
Aug 2, 2010
339
6
18
El Paso, TX
Mar 28, 2011
#6
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • #6
highhorseb said:
Snippet from

1967 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500CR Recreation - Mustang Monthly



Now, I personally have no problems with the Dynacorn bodies and think they should be issued a VIN the same as a kit car (does a 427 Cobra sell for less because Factory 5 makes a kit car?). However, advertising the cars and charging a premium as original fastbacks then swapping the vin to a Dynacorn body is misleading and deceptive marketing. I don't know what charges OK brought Engel up on but I wouldn't purchase a $10 part from someone like that....
Click to expand...


I agee, Engle got cought swapping VIN's, either from junk cars with clean titles to okay cars with junk titles or to Dynacorn bodies. This is exactly what got Unique in trouble. I'm surprised Shelby didn't cut ties with them. But if a method was devaloped so someone can register a built car using a Dynacorn body, then maybe there is a silver lining in the fuss.
 

mustangmutt

Member
Aug 2, 2010
339
6
18
El Paso, TX
Mar 29, 2011
#7
  • Mar 29, 2011
  • #7
This is from a local OK news source, July 9, 2010

OSBI seizes Shelby Mustangs - KFOR

I used to have another link to the Court Documents, but I am having trouble finding it. From what I remember last summer, Engle paid a fine and promised to be a good boy. I don't know what happened to the cars that were hauled off. They probably got them back.
 

mustangmutt

Member
Aug 2, 2010
339
6
18
El Paso, TX
Mar 29, 2011
#8
  • Mar 29, 2011
  • #8
LOL I just realized he was getting busted right around the same time the MM write up came out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Did you start the restoration in Arkansas of a 1965 Mustang coupe and sold it in May of 2014
  • Woody3882
  • May 17, 2020
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
0
Views
1K
Regional Forums and Event Information May 17, 2020
Woody3882
C
04 V6 Restoration: Stick w/6 or v8 swap? Thoughts?
  • cojack2011
  • Aug 13, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2018
cojack2011
C
Once and For All.....Door to Body Weather Stripping Shootout
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Oct 3, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 5 6 7
Replies
128
Views
38K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2023
rednotch
Which One, Really
  • joetrainer31
  • Apr 7, 2017
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
3K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 14, 2017
RaggedGT
J
  • Locked
Expired Restored 1992 Mustang Gt Beautiful!
  • Jake1873
  • Aug 9, 2016
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
3K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 20, 2016
Chris powers
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?