• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Clean Fox, NOT COOL!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbonella
  • Start date Start date Nov 3, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Nov 6, 2009
#21
  • Nov 6, 2009
  • #21
89-5leet-eh said:
Thats one of the saddest things ive ever seen.Beautiful Mustang being treated like that. What a fkn tard laughing about it to.I was cringeing the whole time i had to endure watching that crap
this was somebodys good idea? /boggle
/sigh
Click to expand...

Cringing really? Maybe you should get help.
 
R

rednotch88

Member
Sep 6, 2008
151
0
16
CHICAGO
Nov 22, 2009
#22
  • Nov 22, 2009
  • #22
89-5leet-eh said:
Thats one of the saddest things ive ever seen.Beautiful Mustang being treated like that. What a fkn tard laughing about it to.I was cringeing the whole time i had to endure watching that crap
this was somebodys good idea? /boggle
/sigh
Click to expand...

your not alone bud.....
 
U

undercnstrction

New Member
Nov 10, 2009
312
0
0
Nov 23, 2009
#23
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #23
you know the best part about C4C???????

it actually cost the american tax payers....$24,000 per vehicle

don't even get me started on obamacare and cap-n-tax!
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Nov 23, 2009
#24
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #24
This sent me down a path that I would have rather not gone... there are SO many posts on youtube of 'stangs getting C4C'ed...
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Nov 23, 2009
#25
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #25
The program, ehh could care less about it, sad to see cars that could have gone to good people with no money get destroyed, but this car was a stock 5.0. They basically ruined a stock ford block if you think about it? even if the stuff did damage the heads, so what E7s are a dine a dozen junk?

I guess it sucks, but in the end this is a stock fox, worth nearly nothing in the eyes of everyone but Mustang people, and the parts that actually got ruined are mainly useless to those of us who care about these cars.
 

dcurtis

10 Year Member
Jan 19, 2006
688
7
39
Nov 23, 2009
#26
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #26
I just read that while the yards can sell all of the parts of the clunkers minus drivetrain, they are only allowed 6 months for each car before it has to be crushed.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Nov 23, 2009
#27
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #27
Then shouldn't someone who is sad at this car being clunkered head out to the yard and buy it???
 

FrankenStang

Now, give me a damn CT!
15 Year Member
Apr 16, 2005
4,461
70
129
Florence, Az
Nov 23, 2009
#28
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #28
stykthyn said:
all hail Obama

Posted via Mobile Device
Click to expand...

BlackGT89 said:
Ummm, ummm, ummmm...
Click to expand...

Chrome_Rust said:
Obama = Tehsux

yea I just said that.

Glenn Beck 4 Prez!
Click to expand...

RsStanG1987 said:
Not really Obamas fault the stealerships were greedy. It was origonally budgeted for like 4 cars a dealer.
Click to expand...
Fight Club
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Dec 11, 2009
#29
  • Dec 11, 2009
  • #29
We have a lot of cash 4 clunkers here. Once the car is here, we have 9 months to dismantle and keep what we want to sell. Once the 9 months is up, the bodies must be crushed and the titles are sent to the state. You cannot sell them to repair.

The list we have got is large but the ones that blew my minds were:

1. 99 Navigator...pretty nice.

2. 99 Sieraa 1500 4x2...mint.

3. -2- 98 Mark VIII's very nice cars.

4. 01 Expedition.

5. 05 Escape.

The list goes on, we got tons of them, but these ones above made me ask myself why? lol
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Dec 11, 2009
#30
  • Dec 11, 2009
  • #30
screw the stangs... i feel bad for the guy who had to do that to the GNX that hit the C4C line... that dude needed a barret 50cal to the back of his head
 

1987stangman

Member
Jul 12, 2006
684
24
19
Dec 11, 2009
#31
  • Dec 11, 2009
  • #31
blackened88lx said:
Honestly, who really cares It's a stock motor in just about the ugliest fox I could imagine. Too bad it wasn't a vert.
Click to expand...

Heh, thats a response I would expect from one of my sons teenager buddies.

Looking at the car, and not being there personally, it looks like the original owner could have sold the car to someone who really cared/wanted it for REAL cash, maybe even more than the C4C would allow.

Even the ugliest Foxes can be made pretty!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
P
Fox 17" Deep Dish Bullitts on Rear of Fox, 275/40/17?
  • pindude80
  • May 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
754
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 4, 2025
Noobz347
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
659
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
140
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
777
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?