• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Cobra or Edelbrock Intake for AFR 165's

  • Thread starter Thread starter dustin440
  • Start date Start date Apr 13, 2006
D

dustin440

New Member
Feb 8, 2006
5
0
1
Apr 13, 2006
#1
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #1
I currently have a 1988 GT with a Cobra intake, 65 TB, 1.72's, 1 5/8 shorty headers, full 2 1/2 exhaust w/o cats on an other wise stock motor. I just bought some AFR 165 60cc heads, Edelbrock Performer (not RPM) intake, MSD digital 6 and 1.6 roller rockers all for $950 so it was a deal I couldn't pass up.

I want to know which intake would be the best one to use. I am going to have the heads ported and the intake I choose ported and matched to the heads. I also I am going to be installing an f-cam and converting the car to mass air with a 75mm Pro-M and I want to use the 1.72's unless the valves hit.
 
J

jwcma

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
70
0
6
Bay Area, CA
Apr 13, 2006
#2
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #2
If the heads you got are in decent shape, you got a great deal. I don't know why you'd want to port the heads though. Kinda defeats the purpose of getting AFR's. The Edelbrock should be easier to port due to the removeable plenum cover.
 

STANGateURlilSS

Founding Member
May 2, 2002
716
0
16
USA & SANDBOX
Apr 13, 2006
#3
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #3
well cam lift with the stock 1.6 ratio rocker is .512 but with your 1.72 the lift is .550.. so it will be close but as we all know the max lift number is where ptv clearance is a problem.. but you should always check ptv clearance when installing a cam.. no matter what it is.. as for intakes.. if your going to have one ported i would say edelbrock.. easy to port with the removable cover..
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Apr 13, 2006
#4
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #4
the RPM or RPM2 intake is one of the most popular intakes on AFR heads. proven winner.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Apr 13, 2006
#5
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #5
jwcma said:
I don't know why you'd want to port the heads though. Kinda defeats the purpose of getting AFR's.
Click to expand...
+1 not much material to be removed from AFRs.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 13, 2006
#6
  • Apr 13, 2006
  • #6
stangateurlilss - At peak lift the piston is quite a ways down in the cylinder when the valve is open. Duration and period of overlap have more to do with it, along with valve size, and piston style/type.

The regular Performer is very popular as well...with the 165's...Ed Curtis said that they have a more useable powerband than the RPM to me...but mine is more street use (daily driver)...it likes to rev just fine at 6,000rpm by the way
 
W

WLDHRSE

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2001
701
1
19
Elkton, MD
Apr 14, 2006
#7
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #7
There are only two reasons to EVER run a Cobra intake:

1) You like/want the Cobra name on top.

2) It was free and you have nothing else.

The Performer is a better intake, and it costs less. Same with just about every other intake on the market.

Like others have said, I wouldn't mess with the AFR's. Just match your Performer to the AFR's.

Cliff
 
D

dustin440

New Member
Feb 8, 2006
5
0
1
Apr 14, 2006
#8
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #8
Thanks for the responses. Looks like the cobra will be up for sale so if anyone wants it let me know.

The heads have about 5-10,000 miles on them but are in really good shape. I am just going to have them port matched to the intake and cleaned up from the miles. I have a friend at a performance shop so it isn't going to cost me anything and since he will already be doing the intake I figure now is a good time. I am also going to spray this motor pretty good so I want to get all I can out of it.
 
B

Biggeley

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
136
0
0
Apr 14, 2006
#9
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #9
Ported, both the performer and cobra will be a very good match to the AFR heads. I doubt you will see a difference in performance either way. If you go to FTI's website, and look at some of Ed Curtis's combos.. The ported cobra guys are running the same times as the edelbrock intake guys..

I say chose which one you like the looks of best, or sell the one you can make the most money off of...
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 14, 2006
#10
  • Apr 14, 2006
  • #10
On Ed's website their isn't much selection to look at it, and plus combos differ greatly...powerband of cam, accessories that are being run, race weight, etc...etc...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Weird sound coming from a freshly rebuilt 5.0L
  • karhoot
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
199
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 27, 2026
Mac131
SOLD Sold.
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
289
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
W
I have some 4.6 questions.
  • whiskerz
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
290
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
squeak93
M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
685
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 17, 2026
fasterthangas
F
C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
437
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?