• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Code 22 - MAP/Barometric Pressure Sensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter ARTTII
  • Start date Start date May 26, 2006
A

ARTTII

New Member
Jan 13, 2004
272
2
0
Detroit, MI
May 26, 2006
#1
  • May 26, 2006
  • #1
Code 22 - MAP/Barometeric Pressure Sensor

I just pulled the codes on my EFI conversion - I got code 22. Will this cause a no start/eratic idle??

Engine will start/catch and run widly for about 2 seconds... then stall.
 

97gsr

Member
May 4, 2005
31
0
6
May 26, 2006
#2
  • May 26, 2006
  • #2
yes this would cause a no start condition. Since the map sensor is comparing the pressure outside the intake to the pressure inside the intake and adjusting air and fuel from that. Then if you are not getting a reading then it doesn't know what the pressure is and can't set your fuel trim. So it gets confused and doesn't know what to do and either puts too much fuel or not enough in causing the car to stall.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
May 26, 2006
#3
  • May 26, 2006
  • #3
SD or MAF car?
 
A

ARTTII

New Member
Jan 13, 2004
272
2
0
Detroit, MI
May 26, 2006
#4
  • May 26, 2006
  • #4
MAF - Using Ford Fuel Injection conversion harness
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
May 27, 2006
#5
  • May 27, 2006
  • #5
If it's MAF, you would want the BAP (in this case) vented (not connected to manifold vac). Yours isnt connected to manifold vac by chance, is it?

I havent had a bad BAP sensor, but in theory it seems like it could screw with the stoichiometry enough to make a difference. I would test the wiring and sensor before replacing it (they are fairly cheap). Someone like Jrichker can offer a lot better advice.

Good luck.
 
M

Marlboro_Man

Member
Sep 30, 2005
437
1
18
Houston, TX
May 27, 2006
#6
  • May 27, 2006
  • #6
HISSIN50 said:
If it's MAF, you would want the BAP (in this case) vented (not connected to manifold vac). Yours isnt connected to manifold vac by chance, is it?

I havent had a bad BAP sensor, but in theory it seems like it could screw with the stoichiometry enough to make a difference. I would test the wiring and sensor before replacing it (they are fairly cheap). Someone like Jrichker can offer a lot better advice.

Good luck.
Click to expand...
While everything you said is true to what i know.....My car was converted to MAF and it uses a map sensor (vacuum line connected) to run right ?
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
May 27, 2006
#7
  • May 27, 2006
  • #7
MAP and BAP are basically the same sensor. The Mass Air cars vent the sensor to the outside atmosphere, while the Speed Density connect it to manifold vacuum. An important step in a Mass Air conversion is to disconnect the vaccum line from the MAP sesnor and cap or plug the manifold end to prevent a vaccum leak.

Code 22 MAP (vacuum) or BARO signal out of range. The MAP or BARO sensor is pretty much the same sensor for both Mass Air & Speed Density cars. The main difference is where it is connected. Mass Air cars vent it to the atmosphere, while Speed Density cars connect it to the intake manifold vacuum. Its purpose is to help set a baseline for the air/fuel mixture by sensing changes in barometric pressure. The MAP or BAP sensor puts out a 5 volt square wave that changes frequency with variations in atmospheric pressure. The base is 154 HZ at 29.92" of mercury - dry sunny day at sea level, about 68-72 degrees. You need an oscilloscope or frequency meter to measure it. There is no way you can use a common cheap voltmeter or DVM to accurately measure the output signal.

The MAP/BARO sensor is mounted on the firewall behind the upper manifold.

Baro or MAP test using frequency meter - run the test key on engine off. The noise from the ignition system will likely upset the frequency meter. I used a 10 x oscilloscope probe connected from the frequency meter to the MAP/BAP to reduce the jitter in the meter's readout.

If it is defective, your air/fuel ratio will be off and the car’s performance & emissions will suffer

Some basic checks you can make to be sure that the sensor is getting power & ground:
Note that all resistance tests must be done with power off. Measuring resistance with a circuit powered on will give false readings and possibly damage the meter.
Check the resistance between the black/white wire on the MAP/BARO sensor and then the black/white wire on the EGR and the same wire on the TPS. It should be less than 1 ohm. Next check the resistance between the black/white wire and the negative battery cable. It should be less than
1.5 ohm.

The following power on check requires you to turn the ignition switch to the Run position.
Use a DVM to check for 5 volts on the orange/white wire. If it is missing, look for +5 volts at the orange/white wire on the TPS or EGR sensors Use the black/white wire for the ground for the DVM.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
May 27, 2006
#8
  • May 27, 2006
  • #8
Marlboro_Man said:
While everything you said is true to what i know.....My car was converted to MAF and it uses a map sensor (vacuum line connected) to run right ?
Click to expand...


If it's been converted to mass air then there should be NO vac line connected to the MAP sensor. As suggested by Hissin, it should be left unplugged and open to ambient air.
 
M

Marlboro_Man

Member
Sep 30, 2005
437
1
18
Houston, TX
May 27, 2006
#9
  • May 27, 2006
  • #9
Daggar said:
If it's been converted to mass air then there should be NO vac line connected to the MAP sensor. As suggested by Hissin, it should be left unplugged and open to ambient air.
Click to expand...
Well I'll try unplugging the vac line and capping it off today and see how it runs, then i'll post back in this thread and let yall know how it did.

But like i said it has been connected since i bought the car and it runs just fine ?!?
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
May 27, 2006
#10
  • May 27, 2006
  • #10
Marlboro_Man said:
Daggar said:
If it's been converted to mass air then there should be NO vac line connected to the MAP sensor. As suggested by Hissin, it should be left unplugged and open to ambient air.
Click to expand...

Well I'll try unplugging the vac line and capping it off today and see how it runs, then i'll post back in this thread and let yall know how it did.
Click to expand...

Please re-read was has been posted. You do not cap off that connection on the MAP. You leave it open with nothing at all connected to it so that the port. That way, that port is open to the atmosphere and the EEC will be able to read the current atmospheric/barometric pressure.

For SD, the EEC reads the pressure from the MAP before the engine starts to know the barometric pressure at start up (before startup, the intake is at atmospheric pressure). In "just about all" cases, that's "good enough". Of course, don't drive up or down any mountains. Yea, that method the the SD EEC uses to save a sensor isn't a very good method for people that go skiing or hiking. Still, it "works okay".
 
M

Marlboro_Man

Member
Sep 30, 2005
437
1
18
Houston, TX
May 27, 2006
#11
  • May 27, 2006
  • #11
stang&2Birds said:
Please re-read was has been posted. You do not cap off that connection on the MAP. You leave it open with nothing at all connected to it so that the port. That way, that port is open to the atmosphere and the EEC will be able to read the current atmospheric/barometric pressure.

For SD, the EEC reads the pressure from the MAP before the engine starts to know the barometric pressure at start up (before startup, the intake is at atmospheric pressure). In "just about all" cases, that's "good enough". Of course, don't drive up or down any mountains. Yea, that method the the SD EEC uses to save a sensor isn't a very good method for people that go skiing or hiking. Still, it "works okay".
Click to expand...
I think you misunderstood me becuase i didn't explain myself very well.

What i meant was that i would unplug the vacuum line that is currently connected to the map/bap sensor and then use a srew or something to plug up the vacuum line from the tree, that way there won't be a vacuum leak. Thus leaving the map/bap sensor open to atmosphere.

I'm fixing to go try it right now, be right back.
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
May 27, 2006
#12
  • May 27, 2006
  • #12
Marlboro_Man said:
What i meant was that i would unplug the vacuum line that is currently connected to the map/bap sensor and then use a srew or something to plug up the vacuum line from the tree, that way there won't be a vacuum leak. Thus leaving the map/bap sensor open to atmosphere.
Click to expand...
That makes sense! All is cool.
 
M

Marlboro_Man

Member
Sep 30, 2005
437
1
18
Houston, TX
May 27, 2006
#13
  • May 27, 2006
  • #13
Well it doesn't seem to run any different better or worse so i'll try it like this tonight and see if it acts up at all and if all is well i'll check the codes tommorow and see if it throws any.
 

_jb_

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
808
0
0
Michigan, Berrien County
May 28, 2006
#14
  • May 28, 2006
  • #14
http://www.stangnet.com/tech/maf/massairconversion.html
Read #8
 
M

Marlboro_Man

Member
Sep 30, 2005
437
1
18
Houston, TX
May 28, 2006
#15
  • May 28, 2006
  • #15
Well it seems to be running good with the map sensor vacuum line removed. Then again it ran good with it connected so who knows!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
87 fox code 22
  • Showpony87
  • Aug 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
876
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2024
Showpony87
S
Engine Fuel not pumping
  • Creomod
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
695
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 3, 2026
Shakerhood
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
703
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
561
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Engine Surging idle on start-up
  • keel
  • Aug 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
749
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
keel
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?